Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%

  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%

  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%

  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%

  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%

  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%

  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%
  • Total voters
    2,240
CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps said:
$2,505,006,094,000 for loss of civil cases (Stebbins v. Microsoft, Stebbins v. Wal-Mart, and Stebbins v. Golden)
Click to expand...
Oh man, that's rough, I definitely feel for Acer here. Put yourself in his shoes - you're about to get two and a half trillion dollars in settlements when your asshole dad suddenly decides to force you to stab him in the face because the internet runs too slow, which lands you in jail for a couple months and you end up losing the lawsuits because of it. Say what you want about Stabby, but he has every right to be mad in this particular case. I'd be fucking FUMING if that happened to me.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Instant_Pot_User, REGENDarySumanai, Blindeye and 10 others
Did Disney hire Acerthorn on their legal team?
IMG_3833.jpeg
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, REGENDarySumanai, Meat Target and 7 others
Stitch Meowsky said:
I understand, the courts exist for the little guy to be able to hold institutions/people accountable. In Forma Pauperis is a good concept because you shouldn't be denied the ability to hold someone accountable due to poor finances.

But come on man, like you said at a certain point they should lose that ability. We should have the right not to be persecuted by a fat psychopath who can do this for free AND get paid in neetbux to do it.
Click to expand...
I feel there is a two part solution to it. Firstly certain revisions might be needed to the Vexatious Litigant classifications and application, specifically making it something that applies across all districts if you're branded such, but maybe some extra barriers to applying it, for example needing the consideration of multiple judges to agree as well drawing actually lines that need to be crossed to even begin to qualify such being to prove that someone is abusing the courts by being able to demonstrate multiple bad faith cases were brought before the courts, just so that we can maintain both the spirit of the systems in place, but account for the changes in the world that allow their abuse.

The second change needed is a way to force the courts to actually respect and enforce it, such as a clause that allows those who are wrongfully damaged by In Forma Pauperis Vexatious Litigants to collect damages and costs from the courts. Likely to actually be able to afford such a system we would need to allow the courts squeeze blood from any such stones that manage to get such a branding. Not necessarily their full amount, but some form of standardized fine. The type of thing that has people realize "Abusing the courts and the public institutions of our society is damaging to our society and WILL NOT be tolerated."

Ultimately this is just a way to help encourage people to finally lynch these types of ticks on society. I can think of all the reasons this is a bad idea and will fuck over taxpayers. We're at the point where the real solution is to piss off taxpayers until they start putting those who abuse our social systems in their place either by bullying them into behaving or decorating trees
Catgirls are Love said:
Oh you poor innocent child.
View attachment 6304155
Click to expand...
Here's another place we need to update the judicial system. We need to grant judges the right to look an an appeal and refuse it with the only reason being "the appealant needs to cope and seethe". You know the judges want to. We just need to let them have that power.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Broken Cuddles
Vinluv Handesbukia said:
Did Disney hire Acerthorn on their legal team?
View attachment 6307849
Click to expand...
I think it's more of a combination of Disney's legal department is terrified for the case to go to a jury due to the potentially losses (relatively minor issue given the size of Disney as an entity) and their legal department having WAY TOO MUCH freedom and autonomy to do any hail mary tactic without any other part of Disney (say PR or non-coked up lawyers) to tell them "NO! We aren't doing this. It's insane. It isn't going to work and it's an optics nightmare!"

This ends up happening with a lot of large companies.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Instant_Pot_User, Broken Cuddles, REGENDarySumanai and 1 other person
JustStopDude said:
I think it's more of a combination of Disney's legal department is terrified for the case to go to a jury due to the potentially losses
Click to expand...
If I'm not mistaken, the guy is asking for all of fifty grand for a dead wife. That's couch cushion money for Disney, it's shocking they didn't settle with him immediately. I think it's more Legal is trying to hammer through a gigantically broad-ranging precedent in a hopefully friendly court.
 
  • Feels
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Instant_Pot_User, Dawdler, bile demon and 4 others
Stebbins v CmdrImperialSalt docket 21 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis
He claims to have a spouse on page 1.
gov.uscourts.cand.432702.20.1_1.png
He doesn't provide income information for his "spouse" even though the instructions say not to leave anything blank.
gov.uscourts.cand.432702.20.1_2.pnggov.uscourts.cand.432702.20.1_3.pnggov.uscourts.cand.432702.20.1_4.pnggov.uscourts.cand.432702.20.1_5.pnggov.uscourts.cand.432702.20.1_6.png
Acerthorn discloses Jones owes him $1,800, not the $10,000+ he was demanding earlier.
 

Attachments

  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: koos koets, Not a bee, 306h4Ge5eJUJ and 4 others

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Lucas Silva #4903141, Not a bee, WTBOnlineFather and 5 others
A quick glance over tells me Stabby is sticking with his usual tactics

blah blah blah used 100% of my content blah blah blah commentary and criticism isn't fair use blah blah blah harassment and libel blah blah blah. Same old same old, in fact I believe some of it is a copy pasta from his other lolsuits.

I do wonder though if Stabby don't have a small point here. Shouldn't the Magistrate have given his reasons rather then just a flat, if very funny, not today Mr Vex Lit.

@Useful_Mistake

Is this normal? I don't know US law well enough to know if a Magistrate Judge needs to list his reasons for a dismissal on a IFP case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lucas Silva #4903141 and TurboNAS
He’s a filing machine. Too bad that can’t be harnessed for good like for other IFP people who need help getting their initial foot in the door of the courts.

A couple years to get a paralegal certification and then work for a charity legal group. Ol Stebbins could really make a positive difference in a lot of lives.


Hang on, I just got an email that I’m being sued for ten sextillion dollars for not engaging in civil discussion. Dangit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 306h4Ge5eJUJ
Sweeter and Savoury said:
Shouldn't the Magistrate have given his reasons rather then just a flat, if very funny, not today Mr Vex Lit.

@Useful_Mistake

Is this normal? I don't know US law well enough to know if a Magistrate Judge needs to list his reasons for a dismissal on a IFP case.
Click to expand...
Magistrate did give his reasons.
 
Tiresome said:
If I'm not mistaken, the guy is asking for all of fifty grand for a dead wife. That's couch cushion money for Disney, it's shocking they didn't settle with him immediately. I think it's more Legal is trying to hammer through a gigantically broad-ranging precedent in a hopefully friendly court.
Click to expand...
Yes but he wants (and should recieve) a jury trial. That is where the floodgates open. It would be expected that the jury would increase that amount significantly with pain and suffering payout.

The guy's lawyer is brilliant because the way they filed this lawsuit, it looks like in the media that they are doing this over just $50k. This isnt was is really happening. Disney is doing all it can to get this forced to arbitration. A jury trial would most likely be absurdly expensive for Disney and the restaurant company once everything is over.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Not a bee, bile demon, Broken Cuddles and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back