Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Useful_Mistake]

Creetosis calls the Kiwi Farmers in this thread cool.

Eh, he's alright. I've been meaning to get back into his stuff. I find the whole male vtuber thing kinda weird (feel like that should be female specific), but I don't really have anything against the guy

 

[crab fucker]

I really wish he hadn't gone into full v-tuber mode. Like, fuck Acerthorn don't get me wrong, but the male v-tuber thing always skeevs me out. The EFAP worship is kinda gay too, but I hope Creetosis can finally get out from under Acerthorn's bullshit. The thread is kind of a love-hate relationship for me, cause while I do find Acerthorn's legal filings and mannerisms retardedly funny, I know they are negatively affecting plenty of innocent people, so it's hard for me to completely enjoy it.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Reminder. Today is the deadline for Zander to explain himself:

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Reminder. Today is the deadline for Zander to explain himself:
View attachment 6314434

He's pulling a Greer and filing way past the deadline to ask for a new deadline so he can just explain.

 

[TurboNAS]

He's pulling a Greer and filing way past the deadline to ask for a new deadline so he can just explain.

That’s a terrible plan when involved with Stebbins. Hopefully he’s headed to the post office to mail out his response right now.

Ghosting Stebbins is one thing but the court won’t be so forgiving when they ask for a response.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

That’s a terrible plan when involved with Stebbins.

That made me imagine what a Stebbins v. Greer lawsuit would look like.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

That made me imagine what a Stebbins v. Greer lawsuit would look like.

The world could not survive the pure retardation this event would unleash.

Those killed in the blast would be the lucky ones.

 

[TurboNAS]

That made me imagine what a Stebbins v. Greer lawsuit would look like.

I’d love to see it. Two titans of inane filings battling it out in the courts. Rapidfire motions from Stebbins and plights and extensions for Greer (unless he feels like it). The two accusing each other of bad faith as they volley paperwork back and forth. In the end the judge would dismiss the case with prejudice and find the Kiwi Farms (who get mentioned but is not a party to the case) guilty of a bazillion bad things.

Judgement found in favor of the plaintiff and defendant! Kiwi Farms must burn!

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Acerthorn spergs out at a lawyer on Avvo, an anonymous legal help website.
View attachment 6314244

https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/where-s-the-option-in-ca-northern-district-s-ecf-t-6071485.html

View attachment 6314243

Creetosis calls the Kiwi Farmers in this thread cool.
View attachment 6314245
43:54 "THE COURT TOLD ACERTHORN TO GTFO, LET'S CELEBRATE"

This lawyer didn't help him by giving him the magical words to put in his motion to win a gajillion dollars so he must be yelled at by a turkey

 

[Redline of Sanity]

Reminder. Today is the deadline for Zander to explain himself:
View attachment 6314434

Looks like he made it. Declaration itself is p. 17-18. In the first 16 pages he attempts to characterize the headache of meeting Acerthorn's specific demands for net worth verification (and the fact that Acerthorn questions the legitimacy of basically any documents provided), along with some exhibits showing their very professional side conversations. Acerthorn's current bounty offer for InitiativeKookie is "only" asking for $5k in liquidated damages.

Can't wait to see how the Court sorts through this stupidity. Good thing it brokered this settlement to ensure that this case was swiftly and efficiently disposed of.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Is there any chance the Judge looks over this shit and turfs the agreement?

I mean Stabby is completely off the charts here and treating Jones like a bitch. Jones agreed to one thing now he's nothing more then Stabby's little abuse bucket.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Is there any chance the Judge looks over this shit and turfs the agreement?

I mean Stabby is completely off the charts here and treating Jones like a bitch. Jones agreed to one thing now he's nothing more then Stabby's little abuse bucket.

On one hand, courts tend to lean towards enforcing settlement agreements: on the other, Stebbins has always managed to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.

At the very least, I don't think Acer's objections will be sustained.

 

[TurboNAS]

Good that he got his answer filed.

Stebbins is going to file a salty response I’m sure.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Good that he got his answer filed.

Not really fond of it to be honest. I wish he said the important things first, and THEN went to complain about Acerthorn. The way he wrote it makes the substance feel diluted.

 

[Bruno Powroznik]

Looks like he made it. Declaration itself is p. 17-18. In the first 16 pages he attempts to characterize the headache of meeting Acerthorn's specific demands for net worth verification (and the fact that Acerthorn questions the legitimacy of basically any documents provided), along with some exhibits showing their very professional side conversations. Acerthorn's current bounty offer for InitiativeKookie is "only" asking for $5k in liquidated damages.

Can't wait to see how the Court sorts through this stupidity. Good thing it brokered this settlement to ensure that this case was swiftly and efficiently disposed of.

Interestingly in exhibit B stabby says "i got permission to share these tiktoks because there is a download button". Lets check the ToS

Spoiler: 4.9 Ownership of content and grant of licences

We don’t own your content. If you are the owner of the intellectual property rights in the content that you make available on the Platform, then nothing in these Terms changes that.

To provide the Platform, we need certain rights from you (called a licence). The details of these licences are set out below.

By creating, posting or otherwise making content available on the Platform, you grant to TikTok a:

non-exclusive (which means that you can licence your content to others),

royalty-free (which means that we don’t pay you for this licence),

transferable (which means that we can give the rights you give us to someone else),

sub-licensable (which means that we can licence your content to others, e.g. to service providers that help us to provide the Platform or to trusted third parties that have entered into agreements with us to operate, develop and provide the Platform) and

worldwide (which means that the licence applies anywhere in the world)

licence to use your content, including to reproduce (e.g. to copy), adapt or make derivative works (e.g. to translate and/or create captions), perform and communicate your content to the public (e.g. to display it), for the purposes of operating, developing and providing the Platform, subject to your Platform settings.
The licence to your content that you grant to us extends to Affiliates as part of making the Platform available.
You also grant to each user of the Platform a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide licence to access and use your content, including to reproduce (e.g. to copy, share or download), adapt or make derivative works (e.g. to include your content in their content) perform and communicate that content to the public (e.g. to display it) using the features and functions of the Platform for entertainment purposes, subject to your Platform settings.

Your licences to TikTok and to users end when you close your account or when you or we remove your content from the Platform in accordance with these Terms. However, due to the nature of the Platform and our legal obligations, the licence granted will continue after you have removed your content to the extent that:

you have allowed, via your Platform settings, other users of the Platform to use or reuse your content (e.g. by using Duet, Stitch, download or share functionalities); or

we are obliged to store or process your content for legal reasons.

If you choose to submit comments, ideas or feedback to us, you agree that we are free to use them for the purposes of operating, developing, improving and providing the Platform without compensation to you.

In short: When you post content to the Platform, it remains yours, but we can use it to provide the Platform, and if you choose to make your content available to others, we can show it to other users and those other users may be able to use it too. That is what our Platform is all about. If you later take it down, copies of it made by other users may remain on the Platform.

Note the very first line stabby boy,

"We don’t own your content. If you are the owner of the intellectual property rights in the content that you make available on the Platform, then nothing in these Terms changes that."

Yeah you give a license for tiktok to allow the zoomies to do a retarded dance next to your turkey gobbling but it only applies on site. The owners of the videos still have copyrights on that content and you clearly did not transform it in anyway so it doesn't fall under fair use.

So, stabby child, you have 2 choices.

1. Claim that if you upload shit to tiktok, reposting it anywhere is fine and therefore any kiwi can reup any tiktok content you make to kiwifarms and you won't gobble at null about it

2. Claim that you do indeed still have IP rights and you violated the copyrights of those fat teenagers you download the videos from

Choose one.

Also he is SALIVATING for the name and address of initiative kookie, its kinda sad lmao.

 

[WTBOnlineFather]

Not really fond of it to be honest. I wish he said the important things first, and THEN went to complain about Acerthorn. The way he wrote it makes the substance feel diluted.

It's going to mildly annoy the judge, but it's going to greatly piss off Acertard when the first thing he sees is Jarrod calling him horrible names like "unreasonable". I think you'll find yourself feeling pretty fond of that once it happens.

 

[TurboNAS]

Interestingly in exhibit B stabby says "i got permission to share these tiktoks because there is a download button". Lets check the ToS

Looks like permission is only for sharing on TikTok. Here’s the two relevant sections:

You also grant to each user of the Platform a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide licence to access and use your content, including to reproduce (e.g. to copy, share or download), adapt or make derivative works (e.g. to include your content in their content) perform and communicate that content to the public (e.g. to display it) using the features and functions of the Platform for entertainment purposes, subject to your Platform settings.

…
you have allowed, via your Platform settings, other users of the Platform to use or reuse your content (e.g. by using Duet, Stitch, download or share functionalities);

 

[Useful_Mistake]

More dockets in his appeal case against his district judge:

 

[DavidS877]

More dockets in his appeal case against his district judge:
View attachment 6324556

Aww man, I was hoping they weren't going to remind him.

 

[TooManyKittens]

Dumb question for the legal fags. Is acerthornes threats of ill only demand 5k if you magically dox this other person effectively extortion as its above and outside of the scope of the settlement as agreed and forces some imo questionable activity (albeit not illegal per say on the part of zander?)

Or is that just shit that happens (and a good reason to nail stabby to the proverbial wall with a lawyer and every possible legal nail if he ever targets you)