- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
Since they’re both pro se they can probably skate by a lot of rules lawyers work under. Stebbins’ demands and renegotiation of the settlement have no weight now. The matter is over and done and he doesn’t get a second bite at the apple.
Zell has to finish compiling documents establishing that he’s broke as shit and only has a car to his name and then make regular payments (set up auto payments through you bank so you don’t miss a deadline) and in 18 months he’s out of this agreement.
Too bad there’s no early payoff clause but that might be inferred. If he could find a generous soul to help him pay this off then Stebbins needs to make his declaration that the matter is settled and dismiss this with prejudice.
Or… keep updating the court with the threatening emails and halfhearted attempts to comply with this guy and we’ll do our part to keep laughing.
@TooManyKittens
I looked up California’s statute on extortion earlier and this probably doesn’t rise to that level. It sure would be fun for a lawyer to take a look at it and chime in.
Zell has to finish compiling documents establishing that he’s broke as shit and only has a car to his name and then make regular payments (set up auto payments through you bank so you don’t miss a deadline) and in 18 months he’s out of this agreement.
Too bad there’s no early payoff clause but that might be inferred. If he could find a generous soul to help him pay this off then Stebbins needs to make his declaration that the matter is settled and dismiss this with prejudice.
Or… keep updating the court with the threatening emails and halfhearted attempts to comply with this guy and we’ll do our part to keep laughing.
@TooManyKittens
I looked up California’s statute on extortion earlier and this probably doesn’t rise to that level. It sure would be fun for a lawyer to take a look at it and chime in.