Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Not content to just have his motion to have counsel appointed denied in one case, the wereturkey has filed a motion to have counsel appointed in his suit against Rumble and @Spectre_06

The court will obviously shut this shit down. However, he seems to have learned somewhat, and is actively downplaying his own experience in this filing. I think the fact that he was able to articulate how the factors are "in favor of appointing counsel" lends credence to the idea that he doesn't need counsel appointed, so he might again by shooting himself in the foot.

View attachment 6829372
In almost all cases it's for Indigent Prisoners in civil rights cases.

Seems there's a simple solution. Stabby needs to start doing crime.

Also, Tabron cites 28 USC 1915. Which seems to be for Prisoners as well.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: repentance
It is completely retarded that any case, in any context, would appoint counsel to a pro se plaintiff in a civil case. This almost turns into an involuntary servitude issue; defendants don't have control over when they're defending and therefore need counsel, but plaintiffs have complete control. Being able to summon lawyers at will to work for them is practically slavery.


"Yuh awnuh, ah'm jes a poor retard, too dumb to know what's goin' on in yo big city courtroom. Please gib me what ah want, yuh awnuh."
 
It is completely retarded that any case, in any context, would appoint counsel to a pro se plaintiff in a civil case. This almost turns into an involuntary servitude issue; defendants don't have control over when they're defending and therefore need counsel, but plaintiffs have complete control. Being able to summon lawyers at will to work for them is practically slavery.



"Yuh awnuh, ah'm jes a poor retard, too dumb to know what's goin' on in yo big city courtroom. Please gib me what ah want, yuh awnuh."
I can't even with this lol cow anymore. You don't get free lawyering even for really fucking obvious civil suits that are far more heinous than copyright shit.

If you have an actual complaint and can act like a decent person you either hire a lawyer and pay their rate or they take the case on a contingent fee or percent. If it's that fucking obvious most decent lawyers will make the other side actually regret not just dealing with you fairly to begin with and you and your lawyer both get a fat check. (Which for normies who aren't celebrities generally means enough to fix the problem/cover whatever bullshit was caused and only be somewhat screwed over in the end)

I hope he chokes on one of his hotdogs while gobbling. Really that's a merciful end for him but certainly a relief to the rest of us.
 
The court will obviously shut this shit down. However, he seems to have learned somewhat, and is actively downplaying his own experience in this filing. I think the fact that he was able to articulate how the factors are "in favor of appointing counsel" lends credence to the idea that he doesn't need counsel appointed, so he might again by shooting himself in the foot.
Yeah his vast litigation experience AND vexatious litigant status in two different courts should shut this down neatly.

From the Tabron v Grace case he cites:
As the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has warned:
Volunteer lawyer time is a precious commodity. . . . Because this resource is available in only limited quantity, every assignment of a volunteer lawyer to an undeserving client deprives society of a volunteer lawyer available for a deserving cause. We cannot afford that waste.

Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989).


Appointing counsel for a slap fight over a possible copyright issue doesn’t sound like a good use of this extremely limited resource.
 
Appointing counsel for a slap fight over a possible copyright issue doesn’t sound like a good use of this extremely limited resource.
A vexatious wereturkey's retarded gobblings do not constitute a reason to give him a free lawyer. He can lose his utterly worthless and frivolous case on his own easily enough.
 
Being able to summon lawyers at will to work for them is practically slavery.
Given how Stabbins is treating Zell, he's clearly into slavery.

Maybe the court should order him to go visit a BDSM club and be forced to please a mistress, in the hope that getting laid in a manner he is predisposed to enjoy might get him to chill the fuck out.
 
Come on, this is the funniest shit ever....
View attachment 6828808
What I personally find funny is not just that he thinks his shit is reasonable, but that he thinks that after making fun of Jersh for trying to go for said certiorari. He made a youtube video about it, titling it "Kiwifarms goes to supreme court, it will most likely fail".
In it, there's a funny quote, very applicable to his own unending attempts to ask for certiorari:
"Supreme Court is extremely selective of cases it hears and if more people knew, there would be a lot fewer petitions filed in the first place".
 
phonefagging and having trouble uploading the document, but the Notice of Appeal for the ZellZander case is up. Surprising lack of gobbling.
Screenshot 2025-01-07 194053.png

Screenshot 2025-01-07 194639.png
I wonder how the courts interpreted this case...
Screenshot 2025-01-07 194730.png
Screenshot 2025-01-07 194801.png
Hmm...seems like Stebbins might have misunderstood the case...

Screencap 1: Stebbins filing
Screencap 2: Murphy v. Business Cards Tomorrow, Inc. 854 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1988)
Screencap 3: In re Smith 82 B.R. 113 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1988)
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I haven't seen any indication that the settlement agreement is suspended while the Order to Show Cause is pending, or that the court intends to suspend the settlement agreement if the request for stay of proceedings is granted.
Right. I don't see why it would have even entered the court's mind to pause the payments from the settlement during Stabbin's bitchmade appeals without anyone asking it to, but it really shows you where this desperate gobblers mind is fixated. Really tips his hand. I wager that he thinks he can drag this out long enough in appeals to get all of the settlement, set it all on fire buying worthless trash, and when the court inevitably comes to take its pound of flesh, try to cry about being broke.

Court should just deny it all of this. It's not appealable in the 9th, plus this dumb fat ugly retard asked a judge to rule that all of the settlement payments to date were actually gifts, so they shouldn't count, then has the nerve to try to say that he isn't being frivolous, harassing and knowingly false. Hope you're practicing your best "I'm sowwys" in case the judge holds firm on that end-of-the month deadline.
 
Not content to just have his motion to have counsel appointed denied in one case, the wereturkey has filed a motion to have counsel appointed in his suit against Rumble and @Spectre_06

The court will obviously shut this shit down. However, he seems to have learned somewhat, and is actively downplaying his own experience in this filing. I think the fact that he was able to articulate how the factors are "in favor of appointing counsel" lends credence to the idea that he doesn't need counsel appointed, so he might again by shooting himself in the foot.

View attachment 6829372
Great, Acerthorn found a new legal cheatcode and wants a court-appointed slaves counsel to do his frivolous bidding.

Page 2 of the "Motion to Appoint Counsel" pdf he wrote about his failures and lack of experience.
StebbinsvRumble.png
"I have no paid experience in the practice of law"
IIRC he bragged about working with a lawyer as a paralegal for a very short time and also made a small amount of money as a paralegal on genius.com. I know paralegals don't need a license but it must count for something and he should be forthcoming with this information.

He says his only "victory" was against ZellZander but he also settled out of court elsewhere.
gov.uscourts.arwd.34903.46.0.png
 
IIRC he bragged about working with a lawyer as a paralegal for a very short time and also made a small amount of money as a paralegal on genius.com. I know paralegals don't need a license but it must count for something and he should be forthcoming with this information.
Yeah, he did in fact do this.

This guy just fucking loves lying to the court huh? Lmfao
 
Back