Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
David A. Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt et al
Screenshot 2024-12-31 013852.png
 

Attachments

David A. Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt et al
View attachment 6803522
Well that's the easiest motion to dismiss. Instead of asking for one more month or whatever's the usual, he's asking for potentially infinite time?

4D chess move there if I ever saw one.

All that so that he can put the blame of his fuckups on a "court appointed" lawyer, though I never heard of a plaignant getting that. I though it was for defendants in criminal cases.
 
All that so that he can put the blame of his fuckups on a "court appointed" lawyer, though I never heard of a plaignant getting that. I though it was for defendants in criminal cases.
He's trying to claim that because he could be subject to fines due to his retardation and failure to follow rules it makes him a 'defendant' in a 'criminal' action.

I'm curious to see how it plays out.
 
He's trying to claim that because he could be subject to fines due to his retardation and failure to follow rules it makes him a 'defendant' in a 'criminal' action.

I'm curious to see how it plays out.
it will play out by the judge denying him a lawyer explaining he started the lawsuit and he did something bad and thats why he might get sanctioned.. This is not criminal and he has no right to a lawyer. David will then start working on an appeal to the supreme court that the court is biased against him and hates him instead of working on a response. At the same time he will give a really standard response claiming he did not know there were no fees deducted
 
In 2021 Acerthorn ran his "Secret Joke Contest." To avoid legal problems only US residents were allowed to enter.
In a comment chain under one of his videos he instructs a European contestant to lie so they can participate.
youtube_JBWP5O9mnQo.png
Acerthorn breaking the rules doesn't surprise me. Him being dumb enough to publicly announce it however... actually, that doesn't surprise me either.
 
In 2021 Acerthorn ran his "Secret Joke Contest." To avoid legal problems only US residents were allowed to enter.
In a comment chain under one of his videos he instructs a European contestant to lie so they can participate.
View attachment 6806112
Acerthorn breaking the rules doesn't surprise me. Him being dumb enough to publicly announce it however... actually, that doesn't surprise me either.
To be fair, he's the same guy who offered a "bounty" for Initiative Kookie's dox, and then when called out on it went "erhm I didn't PAY for a dox! Because I NEVER GOT IT!!"
So, because he never got it, it's okay he offered money for some randos dox lol.
Oh. All while crying about trolls and the KiwiFarms doxing him.
 
Leonard French has gone over the latest side splitting filing and put it up on YouTube.

French is such a massive faggot. it almost seemed at the end he was trying to justify Stabby's shit but shut up because he knew it'd make him look bad. All just cuz Jones is a Farmer and French hates the farms because right wing transphobic chuds live here.

Good to see his Jew Tube channel is dying though. enjoy those sub 20k view counts Leonard.
 
French would probably jump at a chance to sue the Farms
Indeed, especially considering our differences in stances on what should or should not be done to children. He supports children genital mutilation and thinks it's not only normal, but a constitutional right.
 
Indeed, especially considering our differences in stances on what should or should not be done to children. He supports children genital mutilation and thinks it's not only normal, but a constitutional right.
I'd likely donate more to the farms is this obvious child molester decided to sue. Guy's aging like milk and starting to even look like your run of the mill old chomo.
 
Uh-oh stebbins-bros....I don't feel so good...

However, Stebbins has proven to the Court his ability to “articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970 (citing Weygandt, 718 F.2d at 954). First, Stebbins demonstrated his ability to articulate his claims in various prior motions filed with this Court, and in his current motion to appoint counsel. Specifically, Stebbins cited relevant, persuasive authority in his motion, which is considered by the Court in its decision. (See Mot. 1.) Second, the Court has asked Stebbins to show cause why his own statements were not false. This is not a complex legal issue for which an attorney is required. Indeed, it is a factual issue where Stebbins is likely the best person to respond. Consequently, weighing this factor alongside Stebbins’ likelihood of success, the Court finds that the potential sanctions are not an exceptional circumstance warranting the appointment of counsel. Thus, the motion to appoint counsel is DENIED.
For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the motion to appointment counsel
and the motion for extension of time to respond to the OSC.
 

Attachments

Back