Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[TurboNAS]

It’s icing on top of this legal cupcake that after arguing about Creetosis commenting on his video Stebbins uses the original music from Fallout New Vegas in his review and loads of in game footage from an unknown source. Sounds like it’s fair use for me but not for thee.

 

[obliviousbeard]

He truly is surprisingly inadept with technology, considering he seems to spend most of his time on his computer.

Let's google that quickly


So yeaah...

EDIT: Forgot to add this from later on from his filing, where he just conflicts what he wrote earlier. Bad form in fourth grade english essay, not to mention legal filing scrutinized by weirdoes on the internet.

 

[TurboNAS]

He truly is surprisingly inadept with technology, considering he seems to spend most of his time on his computer.

He’s saying the only authorized way to download a video is if you pay for YouTube premium.

There’s loads of third party tools like you linked that do the job but they aren’t the official method.

 

[Harvey Danger]

7. Stabby has created a whole new way to categorize copyright infringement. I'm sure the judge will be grateful that Stabby did all his work for him determining that these video's are indeed Grade 1 infringements so maximum payout is required.

That was wild. He is actually trying to re-write fair use law in entirely unmanageable ways, because he's desperate to claim it doesn't apply.




"Yes, I know he had a lot of original commentary, but 10 seconds of it was vaguely repetitious, therefore it shouldn't count. No, I won't cite any fair use rulings to back up this claim, but here's a hypothetical completely different set of facts that is so absurd you should invent new copyright law on the spot."

It's so retardedly arrogant it's... I don't even know what to call it.

 

[Mind Goblins]

If you could get additional transformative value simply by repeating the same things you've already said, then a movie reviewer could theoretically achieve unlimited transformative value without putting in any actual effort just by saying "This movie sucks. This movie sucks. This movie sucks," over and over again.

Someone needs to be introduced to EFAP.
I jest, but only kinda

 

[TurboNAS]

That was wild. He is actually trying to re-write fair use law in entirely unmanageable ways, because he's desperate to claim it doesn't apply

Look, Creetosis created a video full of commentary but I don’t like it so please punish him.

Thanks in advance

Your best bud, Acerthorn.

 

[WarJams]

Applying these rules to the instant case, the original video does not qualify as “published.” They are merely “performed” on my YouTube channel, not licsensed (sic) or sold

This FAT, SLOVENLY FAGGOT is trying to "argue" copyright like a sovereign citizen!

"My videos were not published, they were traveling!"

 

[TurboNAS]

Yeah, it warmed my heart to see YouTube referencing their own TOS that makes it sorta clear that loading videos to their service counts as publishing. The circular 66 info that Stebbins loves to quote always seemed to be at odds with what you use YouTube for - publishing video content.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Yeah, it warmed my heart to see YouTube referencing their own TOS that makes it sorta clear that loading videos to their service counts as publishing. The circular 66 info that Stebbins loves to quote always seemed to be at odds with what you use YouTube for - publishing video content.

I think that's the core of Stabby case vs Jew Tube. I think...

Stabby is trying, and failing badly, to say that HE didn't publish his video but Jew Tube did. Since they published the video that makes them part of the infringement as Stabby never explicitly gave them that permission they are now a party to the suit. The Jew Tube ToS be damned!

Stabby is still clinging to his previous legal arguments that performed is different from published. Where as the correct application of that is a live performance being done is not technically published until it is recorded by a device. But in Stabby's mind his lame videos are performances and because he never "explicitly published them" he "merely uploaded them to Jew Tube" so...yah I dunoo. I can't really follow what he's thinking here beside that fact Stabby thinks he's being smart by trying to re-frame his terribly boring videos as "live performances" so he can drag Jew Tube into the case and sue them for millions.

I mean..it's a retarded argument and it won't stand for a second as it's clear that David is twisting the legal lingo to suit his need rather then present the facts openly as a judge prefers.

A word of advice David. Real life isn't Cousin Vinny and you don't win lawsuits by bending and twisting legal arguments on a technical level. Judges want to rule on the merits of a case and not the legal technicalities. The court is not a robot where you put in certain values and get certain results, the judge is there to ensure there is a level of fairness and justice, as you've painfully learned in the past you fat slob.

Most people are not as autistic and retarded as you David, they can quite easily see your real intention is to punish your critics for making fun of your stupid opinions and terrible sense of fashion while trying to make yourself rich with these vexatious cases.

Anyway I look forward to Mr Stabby's replies. I wish to jeebus we could get our hands on his complaints about the law clerks. I bet that would make for some awesome reading.

 

[RodgerDodger]

I still don't comprehend why YouTube doesn't just drop the perma ban hammer on stabby?

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I still don't comprehend why YouTube doesn't just drop the perma ban hammer on stabby?

one can dream

He's only sue them again anyway, this time for denying him service for...reasons worth a billion dollars no doubt.

 

[Sneedfully and Peacefully]

If Stabby somehow won against YouTube or some other company for six gorillion dollars what do you think he'd actually do with it? Would he even be satisfied and use it on a lifetime supply of hotdogs and impregnable lady boys or would he use it to fund better more litigious lawsuits, as one would expect from the misery golem?

 

[Allied-Mastercomputer]

If Stabby somehow won against YouTube or some other company for six gorillion dollars what do you think he'd actually do with it?

Fuck the money. If he won he’d probably establish case law precedence that could open the door for millions of people who were wrongfully banned to sue YouTube. That could be the most amount of “good” he could do for this world.

 

[Lounce]

I still don't comprehend why YouTube doesn't just drop the perma ban hammer on stabby?

They're likely waiting until the lawsuits are over. If they do it now, he'll almost certainly claim that they banned him in retaliation and try to use it against them in the current cases. He's no doubt cost them tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees as is, so I expect they'll ban him once the last of the lolsuits he's dragged them into are finally over.

 

[RodgerDodger]

They're likely waiting until the lawsuits are over. If they do it now, he'll almost certainly claim that they banned him in retaliation and try to use it against them in the current cases. He's no doubt cost them tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees as is, so I expect they'll ban him once the last of the lolsuits he's dragged them into are finally over.

But it is perfectly normal and legal for a Business to elect not to do any further business with you after you sue them. They don't have to wait for a resolution of lawsuits. He has sued them in Bad Faith multiple times. The saner business option would be to simply ban him. Especially after his repeated questionable tactics trying to force them to disclose other users personal information.

 

[AnOminous]

A word of advice David. Real life isn't Cousin Vinny and you don't win lawsuits by bending and twisting legal arguments on a technical level.

That's not what Vinny did. Vinny won by actually proving his clients were innocent.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

A new debate stream will be held tomorrow
Livestream Debate Announcement - Stormcloaks vs Imperials - Sat. Feb. 22, 2025 at 12pm EST

He supposedly works weekends at his new job selling cellphones but the last two debate streams have overlapped his supposed work schedule.

Acerthorn wrote a Youtube comment reply shedding light on why he thinks SidAlpha is guilty of "libel by omission" for mentioning Acerthorn's knife incident,
Personally I think that document, the first paragraph here, makes a strong argument AGAINST Acerthorn's claims of libel.


Remember, Acerthorn plead guilty to 3rd degree domestic battery and had the records sealed.
The New Jersey Supreme Court says this about libel and expunged records.

It is true that under the expungement statute, as a matter of law, an expunged conviction is deemed not to have occurred, N.J.S.A.2C:52-27. But the expungement statute does not transmute a once-true fact into a falsehood. It does not require the excision of records from the historical archives of newspapers or bound volumes of reported decisions or a personal diary. It cannot banish memories. It is not intended to create an Orwellian scheme whereby previously public information -- long maintained in official records -- now becomes beyond the reach of public discourse on penalty of a defamation action. Although our expungement statute generally permits a person whose record has been expunged to misrepresent his past, it does not alter the metaphysical truth of his past, nor does it impose a regime of silence on those who know the truth.

Not Arkansas but still interesting

And since I mentioned @SidAlpha.

SidAlpha has possibly the worst crowdfund in the history of crowdfunds. He raised almost $20,000 and in nearly 3 YEARS he hasn't provided any proof he attempted to follow through on any of the goals.
He claimed the funds would "tracked and documented"... Where?
Sid, the last update video about the crowdfund was in 2023. Do an update. You don't have to mention Acerthorn, your $400/hr lawyer, or any legal stuff. Just tell the donors where their money went. 3 YEARS!
And unpin the Crowdfund from your Xitter.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I think I remember reading something serious happened in Sid's life a few years ago and he pretty much dropped out of sight. Even his channel has hardly any updates in the last two years. And I doubt a fat useless retard like Stabby is the cause.

But yes he should post what he promised too just to keep everything above the board.

 

[Smokeski]

He supposedly works weekends at his new job selling cellphones

odds on him suing his employer when he gets fired for tard raging on a customer

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Since we're kinda talking about it are there any Pacer updates on Sid's case? I cant check because I'm a retard