Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
There’s some gems in there for anyone else commenting on Stebbins’ videos. The part about the YouTube TOS making videos published when uploaded to the platform and made public, the part about reusing content for criticism being permitted by TOS and having lawyerly interpretations of cases Stebbins likes to reference is gold.
 
There’s some gems in there for anyone else commenting on Stebbins’ videos. The part about the YouTube TOS making videos published when uploaded to the platform and made public, the part about reusing content for criticism being permitted by TOS and having lawyerly interpretations of cases Stebbins likes to reference is gold.
So post them
 
  • Like
Reactions: 306h4Ge5eJUJ
So post them

In dismissing one of Stebbins’ many baseless lawsuits, a court described his arguments as “wildly untethered from any valid interpretation” of applicable law.[] The same can be said of Stebbins’ overlong Opposition to YouTube’s Motion to Dismiss.
Stebbins asks this Court to turn a blind eye to the manifestly transformative nature of Creetosis’ Livestreams and instead embrace a three-tier grading system of transformativeness that he apparently devised for his brief.
the grade that Stebbins would bestow upon the Livestreams has no place in the fair use analysis.
Stebbins’ argument also finds no support in the two cases he passingly cites
Stebbins has virtually nothing to say about the supposed creativity of his Video
Plaintiff cannot hang his hat on his supposedly creative “tone and inflections” and the “unique choice of colorful words”
Stebbins is wrong as a matter of law.
In arguing based on a faulty premise, Stebbins does not actually dispute that the third factor favors fair use when each Livestream is properly considered on its own. His silence is telling.

I'm starting to think this professional copyright attorney has a low opinion of Stebbins' lawyerly abilities.

The arguments themselves are pretty good too. He points out a lot of times Stebbins cites a case with a completely different fact pattern that doesn't apply at all. One time Stebbins compares the 19 hour livestreams dissecting his video to a case where one group printed a copied book word-for-word, and sold it in the same market as the original. Basically 90% of his citations are either incomplete, inapplicable, hold the opposite of what Stebbins claims, or he's just lying about the outcome.

The part about TOS is a pretty straightforward "no you're wrong you fucking idiot" explanation.
Stebbins mistakenly imagines that the license he granted YouTube distinguishes between claims based on whether they are labeled as “direct” or “vicarious” infringement.[] It does not.
Stebbins’ arguments about the TOS’ “License to Other Users” are irrelevant (and misguided)

I won't post all those arguments because it'd turn into a repost of the whole document, and that would make me a Grade 3 poster, very uncreative and liable.
 
Last edited:
Stebbins v. Alphabet Inc.
View attachment 7033878
Stebbins objects
Screenshot 2025-02-28 190637.png
 

Attachments

Citing your own lolsuits (that were losses) as precedence is something else

He's not even citing the ruling itself. He's citing a footnote that references the case he should be citing.

1740795345581.png

This has to be a new kind of laziness. He doesn't even have to search for the case, it's right there, he just needs to type a different sequence of letters and numbers.

Maybe Acerthorn just gets off on citing rulings in his own case that go against his opponents. They're rare enough that he must have them all memorized.
 
View attachment 7039943

This has to be a new kind of laziness. He doesn't even have to search for the case, it's right there, he just needs to type a different sequence of letters and numbers.

I'm almost convinced that David has paid (or pirated) to get his hands on one of those Legal AI assistants made to help lawyers dig out references but instead of using the suggested cases David is just parroting what the AI says by rewriting it into his own gobbling style.

I thought this last few replies were of higher quality then 99% of his shit and it's not that he's learning or getting better at this shit he does, David never changes as he sees himself as perfect. He's getting AI help methinks.

I don't know for sure but I have heavy suspicions.
 
So at which point does Acerthorn have big enough corpus of past filings to just start spamming lawsuits that are basically made of references to his own past work?
I feel like we would be there already if stabbins ever got a W to cite. On the other hand that wouldn't stop him so maybe we are close!

That said, I swear on any thing you like I try to keep stabbins cases straight and I cannot seem to. Maybe I need to create a tracker excel or something. In any case .. am I correct as to status of cases at the moment:

Stabbins vs lolcow - screeching at the court about ECF denial and basically making enemies without response needed from Hardin. Likely to be tossed when stabbins doesn't come up with the filing fee due to being rejected for in forma pauperis.

Stabbins vs creetosis and YouTube: getting trashed by YouTube and told he doesn't get to dox creetosis via courts.

Stabbins vs zellzander/Jared Jones: appealing the denial of court appointed free lawyer to get him out of sanctions for trying to get the court to help defraud zellzander out of a few extra bucks. All objections to zell Zander are currently rejected by the judge and presumably the settlement is being paid monthly still. Stabbins likely to get told to fuck himself again and be on the sanction hook.

Stabbins vs sid alpha: apparently 3 cases for one cow is where my limit is. Is this still a case? Was it ever a case or have I crossed up my wires about who is being sued vs who is being bothered by stabbins.
 
A few pages back it was mentioned that Acer subbed to some tranny on OnlyFans. Is there any proof of that?
Proof wasn't posted in a timely manner, and then the troon in question deleted his OnlyFans. So, that evidence (if it ever existed) is gone. Maybe there's still evidence on Discord, but you'd have to ask @CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps.
See:
I've found the troony OF he's been spending his settlement money on, and I have screenshot proof, not available to me at the moment because I'm a phonefag atm, that his discord server list has at least one BDSM server on it.

The car is apparently the 'safe for work' reason for the settlement, not that he's blowing his cash on someone's OnlyFans. There is no car for Stabbins, only another person's hotdog.
Edit: Stabby Tranny OF saga on hold, information got misplaced while verifying and the person that was receiving Stabby's settlement bucks has been scrubbed from the internet.

Kelly Cadigan is the one that he is/was paying for OF content.
Tiny bit of supporting evidence (maybe):
david most likely would have to already cover 100¤ out of his own pocket now. Since he seems to use up all of his money. From his twitter i guess he spents it on Chicks with dicks on onlyfans ref: he follows and interacts with kelly_cadigan on twitter and talked before about trying to get "ladyboys" to the US

About Kelly Cadigan:
https://www.google.com/search?q=kelly cadigan trans
https://x.com/kelly_cadigan (old tweet history scrubbed)
See archives: https://archive.ph/https://x.com/kelly_cadigan*

Without doing much digging, it seems like Kelly Cadigan is/was a semi-popular TikTok troon who tried to do the Brianna Wu / Blaire White thing of flirting with rightwing politics and being a proponent of transmedicalism. Kelly seems to regret it now though. He did a soft DFE a couple months ago and recently apologized for previously supporting Trump.
apology.png
I'm guessing the OnlyFans was a casualty of the DFE.

Proof that the OnlyFans account existed: https://archive.ph/oogkp
archived-twitter-bio.png
https://linktr.ee/kellycuncensored [Archive]
linktree.png
Clicking on "GET ACCESS" directs you to https://onlyfans.com/kellycadigan/media, which 404s.
onlyfans-404.png

I don't know if Acerthorn was actually subscribed to this OF, but there's proof of him interacting with the troon on Twitter. Examples:
following.png
1.png 2.png
3.png 4.png 5.png 6.png 8.png
7.png FyHs3pSagAAAXmI.png
 
Last edited:
weird I would not have pegged David for a hot dog tranny chaser.

Whut with all his wife beating/food porn fan fiction he wrote he seems pretty straight if not really fucked up.

But it's David Stebbins so fucked up is pretty much par for the course. In fact I'd be shocked if he wasn't a massive sexual pervert in some way. Really...just look at him. His whole demeanour screams sexual offender.

Welp at least he's not a pedophile....that we know of.
 
Back