Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
The best way to intimidate a judge is to show him a picture of your dick, or if you're actually in court, just whip it out and slap it on the table. "Look at this, bitch-ass judge!"

That will automatically win any case.
I mean Desmond James whipped out in court after a woman claimed he raped her and described his penis as being lighter than his skin colour and judge said “You saw a penis that’s darker than the rest of his skin, For that reason alone, you must acquit.” So if it worked in that scenario I'm sure it'll work for David.
 
113-12.PNG

Malicious? Seems to be unclean behavior.
Using "literally" twice in the same sentence? I thought you were better than this, Stabbins...
 
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets
That just means it's literally literally, not figuratively literally.

I got three, does that mean I win in court, too?
Hey man, giving Acerthorn such good legal advice for free? You're so generous.
 
In Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt:
View attachment 6763015
Extension granted; new deadline for response to the order to show cause is 1/30/2025, which may change based on when the judge rules on Stabby's objection.
no surprises here

I wonder how long it will take for the district judge to take a look at Stabby's brilliant legal shenanigans?
 
In Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt:
View attachment 6763015
Extension granted; new deadline for response to the order to show cause is 1/30/2025, which may change based on when the judge rules on Stabby's objection.
I anxiously await the gobbling when the January payment is made for only $75 85 and via Paypal Friends and Family.

Math is hard(tm).
 
Last edited:
I anxiously await the gobbling when the January payment is made for only $75 and via Paypal Friends and Family.
$85.
85.JPG
Though Stabby didn't explicitly mention the deduction when he filed his objection (other than the generic "you have no authoritah"), I wouldn't be surprised if we see it come up again.
 
In Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt:
View attachment 6763015
Extension granted; new deadline for response to the order to show cause is 1/30/2025, which may change based on when the judge rules on Stabby's objection.
It doesn't matter how much time Stebbins gets, the end result will be the same.
 
Acerthorn, please do not use the words 'kill', 'magistrate', or 'judge' in the same sentence in your legal filings.
David, are you really going to listen to some guy named "crab fucker"? Doesn't sound like a lawyer's name to me, and even if they are a lawyer I bet you've read more case law than them. Do what you think is best.
 
David, are you really going to listen to some guy named "crab fucker"? Doesn't sound like a lawyer's name to me, and even if they are a lawyer I bet you've read more case law than them. Do what you think is best.
Exactly, Acer knows what he's doing. He won a case after all. I'd even say he should up the ante on the courts and defendants by using more specific language like "bomb", "mutilate", or "rape" while calling anyone who stands in his way "children" a-la Fatrick. It's a surefire strategy to further victory.
 
The $1500 quoted by the judge is not an accident. Zell already paid $300, and the settlement is for $1800. Stebbins managed to get this judge to feel sympathy for Zell. I bet it is not about making Stebbins pay any money, the judge wants to get Zell off the hook because the Court realizes what is really going on. They will rule that he doesn't owe Stebbins anything anymore, because of the fine.
I am not a lawyer.
 
The $1500 quoted by the judge is not an accident. Zell already paid $300, and the settlement is for $1800. Stebbins managed to get this judge to feel sympathy for Zell. I bet it is not about making Stebbins pay any money, the judge wants to get Zell off the hook because the Court realizes what is really going on. They will rule that he doesn't owe Stebbins anything anymore, because of the fine.
I am not a lawyer.
Jones still has to pay the money agreed. The only thing this would change is Acerthorn only gets to keep a fraction of it. The rest goes into court coffers unless the judge specifically states the money goes to Jarrod if the sanction applies, and he has said no such thing.
 
Jones still has to pay the money agreed. The only thing this would change is Acerthorn only gets to keep a fraction of it. The rest goes into court coffers unless the judge specifically states the money goes to Jarrod if the sanction applies, and he has said no such thing.
The fact that he still has to make payments was evident by the fact that the court also judged that his next payment is only due $85, as opposed to the usual $100. So the court still expects him to comply with the original agreement.
I still hold your post as informational because it is, I made clear that I'm not a lawyer. But I do wonder, in my completely amateur gossipy Internet catlady way, that maybe, this mathematical coincidence may mean that the judge already has something in mind. Once again, I am not a lawyer. Maybe Im being completely retarded and I will take the stickers I deserve.
 
Jones still has to pay the money agreed. The only thing this would change is Acerthorn only gets to keep a fraction of it. The rest goes into court coffers unless the judge specifically states the money goes to Jarrod if the sanction applies, and he has said no such thing.
you are actually wrong !
zell has payed 415 $ so far ( you forgot the december 5th payment david wanted as a gift instead of counting towards to the settlement)
That means that david most likely would have to already cover 100¤ out of his own pocket now. Since he seems to use up all of his money. From his twitter i guess he spents it on Chicks with dicks on onlyfans ref: he follows and interacts with kelly_cadigan on twitter and talked before about trying to get "ladyboys" to the US


anyway david might even have to cover 200 $ out of his pocket since he got a month time extention to january 30th or even 300
 
ahhhh, this was a good read

Another solid Stabby smackdown by the courts. I particularity loved

Thus, the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Stebbins was spitefully insisting on
personal delivery of cash payments appears to be correct.

Courts take parties pleadings seriously—
including the language they use and the assertions they make.


and of course just like I said

Stebbins is incorrect.6 First, Stebbins fails to cites any precedent for his rather bold
assertion
that he can refuse (without review or court order) any payment besides U.S.

coin.

I told you Stabby that you can't just pull shit out of your ass. Dressing up your stupidity in fancy language doesn't fool anyone. Legal Tender isn't the magic word you think it is nor is it some right you have despite whatever legal gobbley-gook you think you've discovered.

Now please go ahead and start your appeal for this decision, I am eager to read more of your fantasy works.
 
Back