Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Bloitzhole]

Just a heads up: 14/10/2022 at 2 PM San Francisco time - I was in the zoom call over the 40 minutes it lasted with the correct judge (pleasant bloke btw), but nothing Stebbins related. Here's hoping my time zone math was not completely off.

Edit: Darn, I checked a couple of publicly available sites (not pacer though) which didnt have filings past August - I missed the post useful mistake pointed out when I reskimmed the thread -.-

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Just a heads up: 14/10/2022 at 2 PM San Francisco time - I was in the zoom call over the 40 minutes it lasted with the correct judge (pleasant bloke btw), but nothing Stebbins related. Here's hoping my time zone math was not completely off.

Please go back a page, and read the post where it says that the hearing was canceled.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

Acerthorn has uploaded a new video titled " The past month was absolute hell for me, and here's why". It's half an hour for him to say "Waahhhh my PC broke" and comparing his PSU issue to a cancer remission. He also states that he has been taking L's all month. TBH Acer you've been taking L's for basically your whole life. You are a fat, bald, autist in a crackshack with no future.

Oh also his modem was Broken. Probably all full of black mold.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt:

Acerthorn complains that the case is taking too long to review

Stebbins v. Polano:

Acerthorn complains that his motion is taking too long to review

Stebbins v. Rebolo:

Acerthorn complains that his motion is taking too long to review



Edit: Technically all these motions are invalid, as the rule he cites requires more than 120 days to have passed:

By Acerthorn's own admission it has been exactly 120 days

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Good way to get everything tossed David.

 

[The sleeper]

Good way to get everything tossed David.

I kinda want to place a bet to see how long until those cases get drop
I'll go for 2 months

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I'd say three, but four isn't unreasonable.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Acerthorn complains that the case is taking too long to review

Acer got his wish.
@ZellZander on suicide watch

Spoiler: Images

 

[AnOminous]

Acer got his wish.

This shouldn't be surprising. For a change he actually paid attention to the rules and stated a prima facie case.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

This shouldn't be surprising. For a change he actually paid attention to the rules and stated a prima facie case.

Now we start the betting on how he will fuck this all up.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This shouldn't be surprising. For a change he actually paid attention to the rules and stated a prima facie case.

I thought earlier in the thread we both agreed that this was pretty much dead on arrival because he admitted he hadn't even gotten a registration (or a denial) from the copyright office? He literally cannot bring a suit at this point in time. This should have been dismissed with a leave to refile it once that issue is cleared up.

 

[AnOminous]

I thought earlier in the thread we both agreed that this was pretty much dead on arrival because he admitted he hadn't even gotten a registration (or a denial) from the copyright office? He literally cannot bring a suit at this point in time. This should have been dismissed with a leave to refile it once that issue is cleared up.

I believe that's actually a defense, though. It should be raised by the defendant, much like a statute of limitations defense. In any event, it could be a lazy failure to evaluate the merits of an i.f.p. petition under 1915(e)(2)(B) which wouldn't be the first time we've seen that (Smelly Melly).

I'm not sure that it is, though.

 

[lolwatagain]

The name(s), billing address(es), email address(es), and all IP address(es) used for the past six (6) months, for the youtube account(s) which have purchased Youtube memberships for the Youtube channel located at www.youtube.com/c/acerthorn on the date of July 28, 2022.

My first thought was that this subpoena was too broad for Stabbins to pin down @ZellZander, but it's actually a very short list.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

My first thought was that this subpoena was too broad for Stabbins to pin down @ZellZander, but it's actually a very short list.

I wonder if they still have that data. Acerthorn demanded that Youtube deleted Zell's account, and it got deleted after he demanded (whether by a Zell or YT is uncertain). It'd be funny if they responded with "you asked us to delete it so we have no info, lol"

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I wonder if they still have that data. Acerthorn demanded that Youtube deleted Zell's account, and it got deleted after he demanded (whether by a Zell or YT is uncertain). It'd be funny if they responded with "you asked us to delete it so we have no info, lol"

If it's been over 30 days it's gone if they deleted it. If they comply otherwise than there's a huge issue with how they save and delete information at Youtube/ Google. Europe would have a ball in court with this information.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

If it's been over 30 days it's gone if they deleted it.

It got deleted in July, 4 months ago

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

It got deleted in July, 4 months ago

Should be completely wiped from their drives at this point than.

 

[Counterfeit Obol]

Should be completely wiped from their drives at this point than.

I wonder how the wereturkey will respond that he shot himself in the foot again.

Now we start the betting on how he will fuck this all up.

Wish granted.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Acer got his wish.
@ZellZander on suicide watch
View attachment 3871140
View attachment 3871161
View attachment 3871164

Spoiler: Images

View attachment 3871224
View attachment 3871230

SUBPOENA AGAINST @ZellZander IS OFFICIALLY SENT OUT TO YOUTUBE.

 

[moocow]

If it's been over 30 days it's gone if they deleted it. If they comply otherwise than there's a huge issue with how they save and delete information at Youtube/ Google. Europe would have a ball in court with this information.

Google deletes nothing. Ever. The company spent billions building infrastructure to endlessly hoard data (including a custom-built network native filesystem specifically designed to ensure data endurance by storing (at least) 3 replicas in geographically diverse locations) and there's absolutely no chance they ever actually delete anything unless some law they feel obliged to obey (remember Google/Alphabet is one of those "too big for laws, lol" companies) says they have to. Even then I have my doubts they actually delete anything rather than just shift data around to keep it physically out of countries where laws say it has to be deleted.

I don't know why people always assume companies actually delete user-generated data (at all) except under very (legally) specific circumstances. Unless keeping a given pile of data is a legal dumpster fire or the data is legitimately useless (old internal system logs, etc.), companies are always inclined to keep user data indefinitely. Storage is cheap (even at the enterprise level where costs are amplified by storing everything in triplicate) and it's often cheaper than devoting resources to periodically prune old data.

And that's assuming above-board, honest, lawful behavior by companies. We already know that doesn't apply to most companies, and I firmly believe all the Big Tech companies keep all data possible that they can get away with (including data they've been ordered to delete -- like I said I'm willing to bet they just flag data to not be stored in certain regions, and their storage cluster just migrates it elsewhere accordingly). Migrating and hiding stuff they're supposed to shred is probably fully automated for most of these companies at this point.

Now whether they ever admit this (or authorities can prove it and extract it from them) is an open question. So too is the question of whether they'll admit this by being helpfully responsive to subpoenas concerning stuff they're not "supposed" to have. I'm betting the answer to both is "no."