Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[MongolianMongoose]

Acerthorn submitted a new amended complaint in Stebbins v. Rebolo. I want to remind everyone this was the order from the judge granting Acerthorn leave to file this amended complaint

"Plaintiff is permitted leave to amend only his infringement claims based on the 2D images and his claims based on the alleged
copying of livestream videos other than the April 10, 2021 video. Plaintiff may not add any new claims or new defendants. Plaintiff must set forth a short and plain statement of his claims
showing his entitlement to relief as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Plaintiff must allege specific facts establishing that the alleged content is eligible for copyright protection,
including that it meets the threshold for creativity and originality, and must plead concrete and non-speculative facts about what the defendant infringed and how."
Stebbins v. Rebolo docket 31

There is nothing "short and plain" about Acerthorn's 69 page monster of an amended complaint, twice the length of his previous complaint.

Acerthorn disobeys another court order.

"Although the Court has ordered me not to attempt to justify this copyrighted work in this Complaint, I still wish to preserve it for appeal. This requires that I include it in this Complaint, because amended complaints replace the old complaints in their entirety, so any claims not preserved in amended complaints are presumed abandoned"

His requests for relief total over $6.2 million. That's 17,000 years of channel revenue. He gets this number mostly by multiplying each count of infringement criticism by the maximum damages under 17 USC §504
However the law says "In a case where the infringer was not aware and had no reason to believe that his or her acts constituted an infringement of copyright, the court in its discretion may reduce the award of statutory damages to a sum of not less than $200"
Acerthorn accidentally explains why the defendants should be minimally liable, if liable at all.

"they believed it was criticism. This, in their opinion, provided them with total immunity from DMCA Takedowns, rendered my DMCAs patently frivolous, and gave them unlimited right to use my copyrighted material. Of course, that's not how fair use actually works, but they genuinely believed it."

There's a lot of milk in this complaint.

"A complete stranger called me, using the phone number I had listed on my pleadings in the Polano case, and threatened to bomb my hometown if I did not agree to stop filing DMCA takdowns"

"I received a package from UPS. It was sent to my home address, but it was addressed to the recipient “Nick Gers.” If you say the name fast, you realize that it is meant to sound
like the N-word, the racial slur against black people. To this day, I have not yet opened the package, but I still have it, with the label still sealed, so I can unbox it on webcam for the
Court to reveal its contents. The odds are overwhelmingly that the box contained something that was meant to be harassing, such as literal feces."

"At this point, it doesn't matter what I did. Unless I literally raped or killed someone, nothing else could possibly justify people taking the law into their own hands to this degree.
Then again, even if I raped or killed someone, you would expect the police to get involved, meaning I would be entitled to due process of law"

random.txt worthy quote

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Polano appeal

Spoiler: 9

Stebbins v. Rebolo.

 

[TurboNAS]

Judge: “Please amend your complaint in this very specific way.”

Acerthorn: (spews 69 pages of trash and tries to relitigate the case at every turn)

My favorite part is the long rambling about someone called InitiativeKookie who is t a party to this lawsuit. They did all the bad man things and Acerthorn is big mad about that, but is suing these other folks instead.

It reminds me of Russell Greer’s lawsuits, he writes long screeds about people that have wronged him but aren’t part of the lawsuit.

 

[kcbbq]

Judge: “Please amend your complaint in this very specific way.”

Acerthorn: (spews 69 pages of trash and tries to relitigate the case at every turn)

My favorite part is the long rambling about someone called InitiativeKookie who is t a party to this lawsuit. They did all the bad man things and Acerthorn is big mad about that, but is suing these other folks instead.

It reminds me of Russell Greer’s lawsuits, he writes long screeds about people that have wronged him but aren’t part of the lawsuit.

I'm just getting more and more confused at his legalling with my apparently tiny brain.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Why do so many of his pleadings include Rape and Murder hypothetical scenarios? That doesn't read as a Red Flag to any of the Judges?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Why do so many of his pleadings include Rape and Murder hypothetical scenarios? That doesn't read as a Red Flag to any of the Judges?

I think the authorities should look into his search history.

 

[Meat Target]

Why do so many of his pleadings include Rape and Murder hypothetical scenarios? That doesn't read as a Red Flag to any of the Judges?

I think the authorities should look into his search history.

One of the youtubers he sued discovered that he has written erotica about beating a woman.

Why he was never charged with attempted murder for stabbing his dad is beyond me.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

One of the youtubers he sued discovered that he has written erotica about beating a woman.

I know

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/david-...binsd-fayettevillesdavid.116370/post-11839368

 

[Fruit Cake Chancellor]

Spoiler: 9

View attachment 5083795
View attachment 5083796
View attachment 5083797
View attachment 5083798
View attachment 5083799
View attachment 5083800
View attachment 5083801
View attachment 5083802
View attachment 5083803
View attachment 5083804
View attachment 5083805

Acerthorn's interpretation of law is so fucking bad it hurts, and I actually think I aged 15 years just by reading this document. I really hope he continues to get the book thrown at him-- I mean, for God's sake, he literally contradicts himself almost every time he files anything.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stebbins v. Doe

 

[RodgerDodger]

Stebbins v. Doe
View attachment 5108027

Which one is Stebbins v Doe? Ive lost track.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Which one is Stebbins v Doe? Ive lost track.

The one where he demanded the court to jail SidAlpha if anyone ever says anything negative against Acer again.

 

[Adolf Christ]

I think the page didn’t get his name right, it’s David STABBINGS or Slashings

 

[Fruit Cake Chancellor]

In relation to Stebbins V Doe, which I only learned about today, I am very confused.
Did the scheduled hearings both get vacated as a result of his IFP motion still not having been ruled on? Or are they perhaps just trying to put off handling his braindead demands?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

In relation to Stebbins V Doe, which I only learned about today, I am very confused.
Did the scheduled hearings both get vacated as a result of his IFP motion still not having been ruled on? Or are they perhaps just trying to put off handling his braindead demands?

The court gave no reasoning. The conference was likely set automatically, and upon a later review of the record, they found it is currently not needed, very possibly because of IFP, yeah

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt (@ZellZander )

Spoiler: 25

Spoiler: 26

@Null informing you just in case. The Judge ordered forum user @ZellZander served (though I have heard rumors that none of the addresses are correct)

Spoiler: 27

Stebbins v. Doe

Spoiler: 9

Spoiler: 10

Acerthorn's IFP petition is granted, subpoena is denied

Spoiler: 11

Acerthorn doxes @SidAlpha

 

[Null]

well we're on fucking tor right now so i dunno what he's hoping to get

 

[yydszmiteg2]

well we're on fucking tor right now so i dunno what he's hoping to get

It all works out in the end, the site may be down on clearnet but we felted a fat faggot. As an alcoholic gay bowling pin with a horse obsession would say "GAWDS PLAN".

 

[Useful_Mistake]

well we're on fucking tor right now so i dunno what he's hoping to get

Not against the site, the service is against one of @ZellZander 's alleged addresses. Since this concerns a forum user (albeit at this point we might as well call him former), I tagged you just in case. Figured you'd rather know than not. If the person served is not him (and I have heard rumors some months back that Acerthorn got the wrong addresses (IIRC Zel ran off and joined Creetosis' discord and started talking about this there (though I'm not part of that secret part of his public discord)), then the next target is the site, so better you know.

 

[Computer Guardian]

Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt (@ZellZander )
View attachment 5133807

Spoiler: 25

View attachment 5133809

Spoiler: 26

View attachment 5133813

@Null informing you just in case. The Judge ordered forum user @ZellZander served (though I have heard rumors that none of the addresses are correct)
View attachment 5133818

Spoiler: 27

View attachment 5133821
View attachment 5133822

Stebbins v. Doe
View attachment 5133824

Spoiler: 9

View attachment 5133831

Spoiler: 10

View attachment 5133840
View attachment 5133841
View attachment 5133842

Acerthorn's IFP petition is granted, subpoena is denied
View attachment 5133844
View attachment 5133843

Spoiler: 11

View attachment 5133848
View attachment 5133849

Acerthorn doxes @SidAlpha
View attachment 5133852

I'm not really one who studies the law, but I must ask if Stabbins actually won or not?, becuase if so, then what does the 'serve' even mean in this case because he got none of the gorillions of dollars he actually wanted from most of these lawsuits.