Debate @Get the rope Macaulay! on whether or not laws against child exploitation will harm Kiwi Farms

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Markass the Worst

don't do stance, kids
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
i'm not pro-CP, i just know that every time there's a fucking "think of the children" law all it does is fuck over the farms. Remember how #dropkiwifarms had evidence of death threats and their proof was a fedpost that was removed in the span of 4 seconds?

Like if they pass a law saying every web admin caught with CP on their server gets the death penalty instantly, with no trial. the trannies would have Null dead within the hour. fuck everything else, i just want this website to survive, and whatever faggy law they're going to pass to deal with AI-CP will 1. somehow allow trannies to get away with all their perverted stuff and not do anything real about CP and 2. be specifically designed to fuck over this website.

Kill yourself

I love this site too much to let it be destroyed by busy bodies who are siding with keffals

When have laws against child pornography ever been bad for the farms?

Before you say false allegations, consider that false allegations can be made about anything. If CP was legal tomorrow, it would not help us in any way. Trannies would switch to the lie that we are responsible for 3 suicides, or something equally retarded to take us down.

the fact you needed to include this means you know i'm not just creating some "what if..." scenario, like considering how it fucked over the farms and how Null can't have a bank account because of "anti-terrorism laws" i think its fine i'm firmly in the "no more laws" camp . also it doesn't matter what i think, thankfully the laws have already been decided on AICP or AI voices or AI actors, so none of it matters, the laws were smart enough to not have to worry about that shit. its just that you know the bad faith actors will use this to their advantage the exact same way these anti-porn laws in places like texas and florida somehow allow if not incentivize kids using wattpad or deviant art or twitch and don't do a damn thing to actually keep minors from seeing the most horrific images possible.

like as i said in the original comment that caused people to want me and kiwifarms dead, every new law seems to do the opposite and magically makes shit worse. porn laws that allow fetish sites but not playboy, 2nd example, and 3rd example

Discuss.
 
With the amount of wataconography on this site, anti-watermelon laws will sink Null instantly. This site won't last 5 minutes the moment anti-AI fruit laws go into effect. It starts with watermelons, it ends with kiwis.
exactly.

edit: i would marry Aella if asked. i still find her attractive, i would not let her around the kids unsupervised for obvious reasons and yes she would have to have kids.
 
i'm not pro-CP, i just know that every time there's a fucking "think of the children" law all it does is fuck over the farms. Remember how #dropkiwifarms had evidence of death threats and their proof was a fedpost that was removed in the span of 4 seconds?
You do realize that Matthew Prince was entirely speaking out of his ass, right? The "worst thing I'd ever seen", all that? He was lying, either by his own volition, coerced, paid off, or threatened.
 
explain how the limitations forced on germany at the end of ww1 led to its military might at the beginning of ww2, while also answering the following question: "are you pro-cp?"
ESSAYS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY GOODNIGHT

Edit: WTF is with pedos/chomos and love of Nazi Germany?
 
Last edited:
holy fuck again with this shit
1000009651.webp
 
If your inmediate reaction to the "Cp debate" isn't bullet for everyone involved kill yourself.
but you are involved
I am a guy, you retard.
if you're dumb enough to be a True and Honest account you lose the privilege of being considered a man to me, also you didn't answer the question
tbh I'm more surprised than anything else that this came out of the Aella thread, as opposed to the Shota/Lolicon defenders thread claiming another one
as former staffette of a website that somehow can't accept donations because of "anti-terrorism" laws, why is it so hard to believe anti-child exploitation laws might fuck this site up.

By all accounts, this website is just as pro-terrorism as it is pro-child exploitation, yet credit card companies refuse to work with it.
 
Back