its more about the lie others like Aella was using recently about "oh AI CP will prevent chomos from doing it irl" like if they genuinely believed that argument why not use it for every other human rights violation such as animal torture, even Aella would see the folly in such an idea meaning she would know that the basis of her argument is also bullshit, meaning the only reason she's pushing it for porn is because of that being her kink. if she's not willing to look outside her own fetish or can see why its bad outside of it that means it was entirely self serving to begin with
but they claim to be sincere, that cunt Aella constantly argues against her just posting bait and genuinely pushes that she's being sincere
I am not sure effectively saying that you're playing devil's advocate is going to look good this late in the game, sir.
It's the one "art" form that's universally banned in developed countries. So it raises genuine questions about the limits of free expression.
I personally blame anime. It is my experience that most people who defend this shit are way too into anime.
Happy fucking Easter.
not enough comments in the articles, mostly people agreeing "X bad"
fuck you too
I can't tell if he's originally stating that like most of the "save the children" laws it will be a blanket law that gets a shitload of other laws added to it because of terrorism and muh surveillance. Like the trannies will somehow sneak in a law about misgendering them will get your gulaged--
The NEW LAW is the next step of government over-reach, and as the last decade or so has reminded us, individuals in the seat of power have proven time and again that they are willing to use the apparatus of government against their enemies. THIS NEW LAW, depending on its wording, can and will be weaponized against Kiwi Farms, if the mentally ill can find a sympathetic bureaucrat to conclude "hmm yes, these receipts of a tranny grooming a child are in fact child exploitation and so breaking the law", for example, that would be their ammo to "prove" Kiwi Farms to be a pedo site, simply for hosting that content, and demand the full force of the law to shut it down.
it always is, isn't it?
and yet here kiwi farms still is, despite this decade-long track record. maybe kiwi farms isn't quite the target you think it is, or maybe you're being disingenuous and the real reason you're sperging is different than your concern for the world's premier antipodean aviculture forum
no, it won't be, and everyone knows it save people using the same arguments the pervs who just can't help themselves always use
what receipts of the kind found on kiwi farms dot net could possibly be construed as such in a court of law?
in a court of law?
what content? is kiwi farms going to be hosting receipts consisting of literal cheese pizza?
your pink triangle is well-deserved, as would probably be a red name with a red strikethrough
(the below is a history lesson/historical context - before some nigger tries to claim something, I'm not saying he's right or wrong, just that there is historical context/precedent surrounding what he's talking about)
Timothy May, 1988
No, at the end of the day, it’s likely that after a “process is the punishment” wheel of Justice turning, Kiwi Farms (a website) will be found clear of wrongdoing. However, it’s the “probable” reach, and the mere existence of the case being prosecuted being used as ammo to further paint the Farms as a “pedo site” which, if KF was the Internet’s nigger before, an active court case against it (please note: all litigation against KF has failed because KF is explicitly US-legal) that isn’t Greer or Acerthorn’s shenanigans, but brought by the United States, would be a dinner bell to the mentally ill to signal boost “kiwi farms are pedos”. Considering how easily #DropKiwiFarms was able to force KF to tor once, this “hard proof” would probably be used to force KF off clearweb completely, because they could escalate it to the level of international law, where sympathetic functionaries would rubber-stamp it.
For sure there is a very real possibility that some laws would possibly be used/weaponized at a later date to push certain narratives or be abused to achieve certain objectives, even if people can't see the route they would take right now. Those could either be at the direction of the government (like the PATRIOT act) or by private corporations (and to a lesser extent private individuals).
This is very true and not to understate the issues with child grooming and CP etc, the US currently appears to have a wide ranging, systematic issue with fentanyl turning a decent amount of its population into zombies (which arguably has a much larger and more immediate impact on society, at least currently). That is to say nothing of the issues with "screen time" in general and psychologically addictive apps (like Facebook, TikTok etc) and their impact on society.
