Yeah I think he's talking about perjury but if document is thrown out completely, what's the base for perjury? The doc was written under "penalty for perjury" but does it matter if it never enters the courts record?
It might depend on the jurisdiction, but where I am from if you make a submission to the court by that orally or in written format that you know to be false, or do not know to be true, than that is perjury. That it got thrown out is immaterial, the point is he made the submission intending for it to be used as evidence in court.
With that said, proving perjury is usually difficult as someone else explained, it needs to be established that this is done intentionally - while Ralph throws that around as if this is some almost insurmountable burden where you need to read someone's mind, in practice it would be establishing that they were not mistaken in the moment when the submission was written. So if you get some dates wrong across your submissions that would not rise to that standard.
If you are a bloviating idiot that shares your entire life online, including the reasoning behind why you are filing legal documents as
Public Record PR then you might end up getting yourself in the shit. Additionally, when Ralph writes that the revenge porn charge is a "copyright issue", he may be so wet brained that he actually believes this to be the case - but it might be that there is a reasonable expectation that Ralph should know better given he was at the fucking trial.
If that is what Vickers' is referencing, which he probably is. Maybe they have the text message evidence from May that refutes it, that said I doubt this will go anywhere, it's just white trash being white trash. May should really just neck at this point, after putting Rozy in a hamper and leaving her in some reeds, because this ride or die shit backing up her retarded husbands behaviours is putting his idiotic feuds ahead of her daughters needs. It's sad and pathetic, not that I would expect anything else from these two reprobates.