Defendant: Ethan Oliver Ralph - Ethan Ralph's Documented Legal Troubles & Other Court Docs

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It's absolutely hilarious how Vickers heating up the alogging got Ralph to start mentioning the entire Vickers clan (something he avoided like the plague) only to reveal the DVRO is impotent in this regard thus ensuring Ralph will shit on you publicly until he expires.

Esoshaggy will harass you in the name of scorning his love ontop of everything.
 
586690A3-14D6-4AA6-9522-DAB7F490C588.jpeg

Trouble for Ralph. Looks like they took his lawyer out back and made him retarded. He’s now reliant on his retarded minions to help him out now
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: Kanuckski, Rusty Fork, Johnny Clyde Cash and 19 others
SaidNoOneEver said:
Tuned in just long enough for Vickers to say nobody knows if the judge dismissed the case with or without prejudice so he doesn't even know if they can refile. Then he went dark to go take a piss 30 mins into the stream and left it to the krewe of insufferable faggots so I noped out. Lasted 90 secs.
Click to expand...

i finally watched it, albeit at x1.5. faith immediately filed to show cause again with a date-corrected document containing the same evidence, though mr. vickers said that they would not know whether the case was dismissed with or without prejudice until the court either rejects or accepts the filing.

then, in his stream from a couple of days ago, he claimed that:

we found out for certain yesterday, uh, that, uh, uh, faith does not have the ability to refile the exact same charges. so they, those, uh, those original charges were dismissed with prejudice. but, it doesn't matter, because there's a whole fucking slew of other violations that happened since the filing. so here's how it works [ ... tech issues ... ] because, because the filing was the same to get the order to show cause, right, but we also know, and i talked to an attorney about this, that the order to show cause, there was no evidence presented. so, she just has to file a new order to show cause with the new violations, but she can still bring in the other thirty-four violations from the original filing as evidence, and in addition to. does that make sense to everybody?

[ ... guests asking questions ... ] the new ones are enough to get the new trial, but at the trial, because there was no evidence presented at the previous trial, right, she can present the old ones as evidence. so he'll still get thirty-four, the thirty-four that he has to answer to, plus whatever. so the journal's not out. wink, wink, anybody listening who might have something to say about that, uh, yeah, that's still, that's still a go.
Click to expand...

that last little bit makes me wonder how meigh is going to respond when the allegations about faith's journal are presented to the court again, especially after the ragepig's recent squealing about the matter.

GUNTERA said:
It's absolutely hilarious how Vickers heating up the alogging got Ralph to start mentioning the entire Vickers clan (something he avoided like the plague) only to reveal the DVRO is impotent in this regard thus ensuring Ralph will shit on you publicly until he expires.
Click to expand...

this is exactly what's providing faith with additional violations with which to refile.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: LGHDR+, FlappyBat, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 5 others
.iota. said:
that last little bit makes me wonder how meigh is going to respond when the allegations about faith's journal are presented to the court again, especially after the ragepig's recent squealing about the matter.
Click to expand...
Vickers is a fucking idiot who shouldn't be saying shit, since he doesn't know shit.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: LGHDR+, AMHOLIO, FlappyBat and 12 others
AnOminous said:
Vickers is a fucking idiot who shouldn't be saying shit, since he doesn't know shit.
Click to expand...
The proto-ragepig was the one insisting that the cases failed due to a "technicality", and then insisting that they didn't know if they were dismissed with or without prejudice even though it sure sounded to people relying on eyewitness accounts of the hearing that they had been dismissed with prejudice, which turned out to be the case if @.iota.'s transcription was accurate.

Vickers should have probably just read the people on here saying that before filing the same pile of garbage again and pissing the court off even more.

Now he's going back to the same bluster he had before?

:story:

.iota. said:
agreed, but the expectation versus reality is always entertaining.
Click to expand...
So, based on your transcription, the Vickers failed about as conclusively as was possible but Vickers has gone straight back into what he was saying before the hearing even though their task just got massively harder.
 
Balldo's Gate said:
So, based on your transcription, the Vickers failed about as conclusively as was possible but Vickers has gone straight back into what he was saying before the hearing even though their task just got massively harder.
Click to expand...

he hemmed and hawed for half an hour before finally claiming:

so the judge has explained to faith, pretty much using case law as his excuse, exactly how she needs to go about this next time. which is, for all intents and purposes, if you want those filing papers to be evidence, you're just gonna have to read the fucking filing papers next time. just read 'em start to finish, because that's your case, right ... if that's your case, if she has nothing to add, then her declaration is her testimony. so just read that, and any of the actual images and evidence she's going to have to submit seperately, obviously, she'll have to email this stuff, or, mail this stuff to ralph, so he has any witness list or, or ... not testimony, because that happens at court, but examples of the evidence that, uh, that he can refute or whatever, um, but that's pretty much what she has to do. so, uh, he dismissed it right there. he did not say with or without prejudice. so, everybody, y'all, i don't know whether is was dismissed with or without prejudice. i think it was without. i think she has the ability to refile. it's not going to matter if it was with prejudice, but we'll talk about that in just one second ...
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
Reactions: fìddlesticks2.0, LadiosSopp, Keranu and 1 other person
.iota. said:
correct. the comments about the judge were from a stream that he did on the night of the trial.
Click to expand...
Those comments are a good illustration of how Vickers is equally delusional as Ralph. When I heard that the judge was listing off case law, without seeing a transcript or a single quote or even knowing what he was citing, it seemed pretty clear to me that the judge was demonstrating for the record that the Vickers had come nowhere close to the requisite standard for the judge to find Ralph in contempt so as to justify his decision to dismiss it with prejudice.

If the bar was on the floor what they came up with wouldn't have made it.

Yet for some reason Vickers thought that the judge was listing off the cases for no practical reason and just as tips for them in the future. :story:
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: LGHDR+, fìddlesticks2.0, John Andrews Stan and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back