a few questions as you seem to be up on it:
as seen below, this Matthew C. Harris is quite often in complete contradiction to himself on anything but hate, narcissism, and offshifted blame for his failures. do schizos so often swing between conclusions like that as they unravel? from my own limited interactions they usually seem to be solely focused on one conclusion to the exclusion of all others.
or is that just because it's the big careening melt downwards? is his wackadoo personal philosophy going to stabilize (lmao) ever?

i wonder if it fluctuates so much because it's comorbid with his npd narrative that invariably fluctuates to protect his ego.
i've very often seen the descent into racism and/or 'twas the jyooos as they break down, but not the pedophilia. is that all him?