Dan Schneider
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2022
Wikipedos discuss on not including where CWC was first noticed online, because the source is a “BLP violation”
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
Wikipedos discuss on not including where CWC was first noticed online, because the source is a “BLP violation”
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_as_food
"This is where Duck as food comes from. A duck."
It's kind of dumb, but it made me laugh more than anything to be honest.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
someone removed it after your postView attachment 4157811
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_as_food
"This is where Duck as food comes from. A duck."
It's kind of dumb, but it made me laugh more than anything to be honest.
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2022
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2021
BLP is so misused Wikipedia has its own policy on it, which of course is ignored when ever convenient.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
What ever happened to Wikipedia neutrality?
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2021
Any editors who still believe in it either have been driven off the site, or only work on articles the woke brigade doesn't care about.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
It died around 12 years ago, and was buried 8 years ago. Now it only exists as a memory or in the mind of people who are either in complete denial and fully indoctrinated into the cult of Current Thing
.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
In good old-fashioned non-tranny autism, there appears to be an editing war going to back to February on the page for Otto Skorzeny over whether the "allegiance" section of his infobox should include Israel:
The pro-allegiance to Israel team is currently winning:
Also I just came across this bullshit after trying to figure out why the infobox didn't have flags next to the governments anymore.
Give me back my flags you pedant bitch.
The pro-allegiance to Israel team is currently winning:
Also I just came across this bullshit after trying to figure out why the infobox didn't have flags next to the governments anymore.
Give me back my flags you pedant bitch.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Otto absolutely should have his service for Israel listed. This is once again a case of Wikipedia trying to "add context" when they should just be listing the facts.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I'm kind of torn on this. Obviously he did shit for Mossad. Are paid glowies EVER loyal to anyone but their own interests though?
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
I'm sure they will try to argue semantics to try and keep a pretty well-known SS operative from being listed as a Mossad agent. Even if he only did some work for them in relation to the Egyptian jobs he was still a Mossad asset.
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
>”does soyjack”
>literally just a guy speaking
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Of all possible IRL examples of Soyjack IRL, that is the one they went with? Let me guess: a politically acceptable target?
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
What article is that? Could they not use a picture of any soy consumer holding a switch?
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2021
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
There's an extremely niche community who use Wikipedia as a social media site. I was just thinking about this as I happened upon a perfect example:
75% of this users hundreds if not thousands of edits are his user page or sub page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheVoltigeur/fakecountry
Pretty much like ADF, he loves making up fake countries and making them fake articles.
en.m.wikipedia.org
For example, meticulously curated, non existing communist group.
75% of this users hundreds if not thousands of edits are his user page or sub page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheVoltigeur/fakecountry
Pretty much like ADF, he loves making up fake countries and making them fake articles.
User:TheVoltigeur/fakecountry/PARA - Wikipedia
For example, meticulously curated, non existing communist group.