- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
I think 3 and New Vegas had the ideal aesthetic for Fallout as a whole. It was a good mix of 'Atompunk'/'Dieselpunk' but also functional to the point it felt believable. Fallout 3 leaned into the 50s aesthetic a little more while New Vegas had a neo-Western feel that kind've complimented each other. Although I did wished the guns between both games were a little more unified. It's still confusing what even was Pre-War America's main service rifle.I find the Fallout 4 aesthetic abhorrent. What a fucking downgrade from 3. Somebody was clearly like "So it's retrofuture. That means everything is big and goofy like in the 40s!" And just went full retard from there.
In 3 weapons and the art deco design had a distinct bulkiness but it was kind of hostile and sharp. Compare the 10mm in both games. In 3 the 10mm is a big, boxy, square gun you could still believe is a sidearm people would use. In 4 the pistol is this gigantic cylindrical tube monstrosity that looks like absolute refried ass.
The R91 or any of the AR-15 looking rifles introduced in NV?
