Fallout series

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Gravityqueen4life said:
someone at Bethesda must have really been butthurt.
Click to expand...
I just assume they were too cheap to get Perlman back for a line/he was too busy, since it's a rehash of the line for if you send Lyons in to go do it. Still pretty awful. Should've just stuck Todd in the recording booth and had him spit something out. At least that'd be funny.
 
Fallout tactics I'm just playing it now first time it's actually really fun and the voice cast is amazing
the guy who's ordering you around is literally voiced by none other than
R. Lee Ermey
also the brotherhood of steel makes a lot more sense they act a lot more like a military I think the problem with tactics is that it should have been more of an open world RPG tactical three person squad game rather than a mission based game
 
Gravityqueen4life said:
what's even worse, the new ending (broken steel dlc) still calls you a coward for not wanting to die. calling the person who actives the purifier the "real" hero. someone at Bethesda (Emil) must have really been butthurt.
Click to expand...
I noticed that and it actually pissed me off. I was doing a good karma run and was basically the savior of the waste and I get called a coward for not killing myself for no reason. Very rarely will I ever get legitimately mad over a video game but that got me.
fo3.png
 
Since no matter what happens the game continues anyways, it should have just removed those ending slides entirely.

Fallout 3 fucking sucked back then and it sucks now, fuck the johnny come lately and nostalgia fags who simp for it now.
 
Be a real fan like you all claim to be and only play 1 & 2. They're the most fun, well written games in the series anyway. Everything from 3 onwards should be a hard stop if you dudes hate bethesda so much. Even NV is just a nostalgia fag trap sponsored by Bethesda that most people unironically bought into :story: (the dlc was really good though and saves the game just barely)

Or I guess you guys can keep circlejerking the same critiques for 16 years straight without ever learning your lesson and blaming them for literally forcing you to play their mediocre games. Whatever you think is a more fun use of your time.
 
Rick The Stick said:
Be a real fan like you all claim to be and only play 1 & 2. They're the most fun, well written games in the series anyway. Everything from 3 onwards should be a hard stop if you dudes hate bethesda so much. Even NV is just a nostalgia fag trap sponsored by Bethesda that most people unironically bought into :story: (the dlc was really good though and saves the game just barely)
Click to expand...
>"Real fan"
>"Only play 1 & 2"
>No mention of Sonora
While I much enjoy base game New Vegas, far as I'm concerned NV is merely a vessel to be filled by the Someguy Series.
 
Last edited:
Rick The Stick said:
Be a real fan like you all claim to be and only play 1 & 2. They're the most fun, well written games in the series anyway. Everything from 3 onwards should be a hard stop if you dudes hate bethesda so much. Even NV is just a nostalgia fag trap sponsored by Bethesda that most people unironically bought into :story: (the dlc was really good though and saves the game just barely)

Or I guess you guys can keep circlejerking the same critiques for 16 years straight without ever learning your lesson and blaming them for literally forcing you to play their mediocre games. Whatever you think is a more fun use of your time.
Click to expand...
Alright. I'll do that to be a true fan.

Still throwing shit at Bethesda though, fuck you.
 
winterfag said:
Fallout 3's writing still would've been awful regardless but the whole ending wouldn't be jarring if they just made up some excuse for your companions not being able to come with you in the final mission
Click to expand...
"We'll hold the line here with Liberty Prime, you and Sarah go inside and stop Autumn!"

That's all it would have taken.
 
Smashed & Slamed said:
Daniel is a disingenuous cowardly faggot. Even if I was a pacifist I wouldn't side with him, I would just do nothing and let Joshua do all the work.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't call him a coward, as he's obviously willing to fight so that the tribals can flee to 'preserve their innocence', or disingenuous because I think he truly believes in he's doing.

He is definitely wrong to infantilize the tribals though, and that's the main point- it's not going to work in the long term because the outside world exists. It's basically like his lies to Waking Cloud on a greater scale, because it's all going to come out eventually.

He's not a bad man, but he's very clearly the *worst* choice for the tribals and Zion as a whole. It's no use retaining your innocence if you're dead.

As someone said awhile back, Graham tempered by a little Daniel-esuqe mercy is probably the closest you can get to what Randall Clark wanted for them.
 
Replacement Account said:
As someone said awhile back, Graham tempered by a little Daniel-esuqe mercy is probably the closest you can get to what Randall Clark wanted for them.
Click to expand...
Which is what you get when you convince Graham to spare Salt-Upon-Wounds. He chills off a little, realizes that he's been rationalizing his own bloodlust this whole time, and the Dead Horses take his lessons to heart.
 
Rick The Stick said:
Be a real fan like you all claim to be and only play 1 & 2. They're the most fun, well written games in the series anyway.
Click to expand...
2 is not well-written, though I completely agree about 1.
Rick The Stick said:
Everything from 3 onwards should be a hard stop if you dudes hate bethesda so much. Even NV is just a nostalgia fag trap sponsored by Bethesda that most people unironically bought into :story: (the dlc was really good though and saves the game just barely)
Click to expand...
It’s very unfortunate that NV was a bug-addled mess when it came out, but imo it serves a fantastic sequel to Fallout 2. Perhaps Bethesda’s original intentions were to have a Fallout game that would appease the og Fallout fans after F3 got trashed on by that demographic, but instead it just got a whole lot more people to realize how garbage Bethesda was at making Fallout games, hence why Howard has a chip on his shoulder. That’s just my theory.
 
The old fallout game had psychics and Bethesda brought them back. Do you prefer fallout to have wacky stuff like magic or do you like it played straight and mostly realistic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom