Rather than keeping things vague, the existence of the airship in the show means that any ending which would result in the brotherhood airship being destroyed in 4 cannot happen, leaving only the Minutemen or Brotherhood endings as being viable (but the former relies on you having foreknowledge to do meaning it's more likely to be the latter). The existence of unfinished vaults in 4 also means that the show's idea that Vault-Tec caused the bombs to drop couldn't have happened since that means they weren't sufficiently prepared for something they planned to begin with. Cooper Howard (similar to 4's fridge kid) being able to survive for so long buried underground without food or water shows that Ghouls don't need it to survive, just whatever is in those vials, meaning any instance of Ghouls requesting water (Fallout 3) or growing food (settlement in Fallout 4) becomes pointless. If the series railroads one of the mainline games into a single ending and retcons one of the DLCs, I think they might go back on things if enough people whinge.
I feel like it heavily depends on the general opinion of the Fallout TV Show come Fallout 5/whatever, If people shit talking the show and complaining about how bad its story and lore is becomes the discussion about the show, I feel like Bethesda will 100% retcon the show or put it in canon limbo like Tactics.
The same retards running the Fallout show ran Westworld on HBO. A show that didn't even follow its own continuity and logic episode to episode. And ended up being a total mess by the time that it was done. To the point where HBO just removed the show from its own network and pretends like it never even existed. I highly doubt that the next season of Fallout will be anything but tangentially related to the first. So that viewers can mindless watch season two without needing to rewatch or understand the first season.
Melee/unarmed DM is the way to go. I've always had good luck with this dlc somehow, never having the problems most have with it. I even got to do most of the challenges by the end of it.
The DLCs in general seem to nudge you towards using melee. Dead Money damn near forces you to sneak so you'll typically end up ambushing Ghost People to fight one on one with knives and spears you upgrade. OWB is absolute murder if you actually do that DLC right when you normally go to Nipton and you're made to focus on a stealth suit and encouraged to upgrade it while your most reliable weapon is going to be a literal battleaxe and Honest Hearts just plain doesn't have a lot of guns and ammo even with the new additions as theyre simply not that common. I just ended up making a stealth melee build by accident in my new playthrough because I ended up doing those DLCs alongside the general track.
Or you can just focus on energy weapons, optimize or max charge your ammo and two shot all ghost people with the Holo Rifle. You do need to scavenge more and even with psycho regular ammo will not be enough for two shots but thats the way I did the DLC last playthrough. 0 stealth, 0 melee, 0 guns.
The LAER slaps. It does wear down quick but that map is filled with all the things you need to make weapon repair kits.
Every single white leg has a at least one gun on them, many times two. If you play the DLC past level 30 the level lists spawns them with 12.7mm SMGs so if you find the survivalist rifle you can keep that stocked up with ease.
I didn't know about that. I usually do release order on my playthroughs so I was never level 30 in zion. It looks like i will be on this playthrough though so that means I can actually use the Grunt perk for once.
I kinda feel like bethesda always been better with their dlc stories than the actual main quest.
SR can one shot most things in the Mojave, especially with stealth+VATS. The extra DPS is meaningless when the first shot is all you need.
For that build, sure. My last run wasn't stealth-based so I got a lot more mileage out of the higher DPS. If you have high crit, it's even more of a benefit.
It's like they have to have that one token DLC that's got better content than the base game. Oblivion had the Shivering Isles, Fallout 3 had Point Lookout, Skyrim had Dragonborn and Fallout 4 had Far Harbor.
Don't forget Tribunal & Bloodmoon being excellent story expansions for Morrowind, which is a good story game.
is it really that fucking hard to make a Julius game? God, I hate konami so much
At least Castlevania fans got to eat pretty good with Bloodstained. I'd love it if a high quality Fallout knockoff came out that nailed the best parts of the franchise it was emulating.
Could always try stuff like ATOM RPG and Encased.
ATOM is less fallout more isometric Metro, not even S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
I think the reason morrwind wasn't mentioned because it was actually well written and made by a guy on shrooms. Ted peterson and michael kirkbride are quite the duo when comes to world building and storytelling.