Manwithn0n0men
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2019
This A-historical perspective on a novel whose expressed desire is to be more "Historically Accurate" is why I can't take him seriouslyAnother great unrealism is the casual brutality that peasants and slaves are treated with pretty much everywhere
Most slaves being treated like budding serial killers treat animals instead of like valuable property... nowhere in the real world would that fly. All that potential gold wasted by wasting slaves. And the slaves wouldn't need Danaerys to free them, they'd crush the Masters in all three of the Slaver's Bay cities and the freeholding nobles of Volantis like nothing by weight of numbers. Brutalized slaves aren't productive and profitable slaves, they're dangerous slaves
Nobles in Westeros riding about raping random peasant women, or serving wenches in their castles who catch their eye, putting out eyes, ripping out tongues, cutting off fingers left and right, gelding alleged rapists, putting nails through hands, hanging people in the market square by the tens and twenties, soldiers stealing from farmers and raping their wives or daughters in broad daylight at the city gates... nowhere in medieval Europe did the aristocracy generally treat peasants like that unless in the immediate aftermath of battle or during the sacking of a city. Not all the time lol. There'd be lords getting killed constantly by peasant uprisings and assassinations
But in ASOIAF this kind of shit happens all day every day almost everywhere, and those peasants and slaves terribly outnumbering the elite and also having ample means, motive, and opportunity to poison their food or stab them in the stomach doesn't seem to worry that elite very much with no visible reason for their cavalier attitude