General GunTuber thread

Slightly off topic but has anyone else been getting bombarded with BRCC ads? New Ads too. Wonder if it has anything to do with going public. Also does anyone else have a suspicion that BRCC is maneuvering towards some larger goal? I mean going public, throwing cash around with Guntubers, Money for new Ads. Things like that are not for nothing.
Too many democrats in the San Anton metro?
Probably wanted to be literally as close as possible to Demo Ranch for collaborations. I think many will agree with me that Herrera is largely a more grown up Demo Ranch with a bent towards AKs and a small amount of Engineering, so I think it likely that further cooperation is going to lead to him being another rung on the ladder for young gunspergs.
 
Slightly off topic but has anyone else been getting bombarded with BRCC ads? New Ads too. Wonder if it has anything to do with going public. Also does anyone else have a suspicion that BRCC is maneuvering towards some larger goal? I mean going public, throwing cash around with Guntubers, Money for new Ads. Things like that are not for nothing.

Probably wanted to be literally as close as possible to Demo Ranch for collaborations. I think many will agree with me that Herrera is largely a more grown up Demo Ranch with a bent towards AKs and a small amount of Engineering, so I think it likely that further cooperation is going to lead to him being another rung on the ladder for young gunspergs.
I don't see adds because I use an adblocker like you should be doing.
 
Slightly off topic but has anyone else been getting bombarded with BRCC ads? New Ads too. Wonder if it has anything to do with going public. Also does anyone else have a suspicion that BRCC is maneuvering towards some larger goal? I mean going public, throwing cash around with Guntubers, Money for new Ads. Things like that are not for nothing.
Not just that but they are opening physical coffee shops too, and there definitely a larger goal: to make a lot of money.

The stock is up 199% since going public so it seems there plan is working.
 
I was always under the impression they were some small coffee company that strategically pushed for trump to get the boomercon demo. Do they have large investors? If they do it should be a red flag for people but then again anything "right wing" that gets popular is artificial with the same wealthy investors.
If the email leaks are anything to go by, its run by opportunists who hate their clientele but, again, boomer cons are retarded.
 
founder is literally a CIA fag
They should just rename it to CIA Nigger Coffee, they can have a gimmick where the coffee glows in the dark after you make it.
I frankly just figure anything that's ""PATRIOTIC"" or ""PRO-AMERICAN"" and gets any positive coverage at all is just astro-turfed.
There's more to being patriotic than the stars and bars, sadly that's all you have to do to sell something to conservatives, just wave a flag around and say you love the second amendment. You don't even have to do anything to actually support it, just say you do. Just look at the NRA!
 
They should just rename it to CIA Nigger Coffee, they can have a gimmick where the coffee glows in the dark after you make it.
I frankly just figure anything that's ""PATRIOTIC"" or ""PRO-AMERICAN"" and gets any positive coverage at all is just astro-turfed.
There's more to being patriotic than the stars and bars, sadly that's all you have to do to sell something to conservatives, just wave a flag around and say you love the second amendment. You don't even have to do anything to actually support it, just say you do. Just look at the NRA!
Their reaction to the Rittenhouse case is proof enough of their grift. They support guns as a fashion statement, not as a tool of self-defense.
 
Paul Harrell brings his autism to the .30 Super Carry debate.

Pretty mild take from him, but probably correct. Something needs to happen for this caliber to catch on, and I don't think Ian's (was it him?) simping is going to be enough. VHS had the porn industry rooting for it. .30 Super Carry needs more than just a pornstache carrying water for it.
 
Paul Harrell brings his autism to the .30 Super Carry debate.

Pretty mild take from him, but probably correct. Something needs to happen for this caliber to catch on, and I don't think Ian's (was it him?) simping is going to be enough. VHS had the porn industry rooting for it. .30 Super Carry needs more than just a pornstache carrying water for it.
Paul hits just about every argument to be had on the subject, but I want to expound just a little bit more in one area.

Handguns and cartridge pairings compete between on 2 or 3 factors for most people looking at personal self defense. Those are: round size and expansion, number of rounds, and (optionally) conceal-ability. Paul touched on this, and was right.

The reason being is for the purposes of a human target, most all handgun cartridges on the market can't get up to the speed necessary while retaining enough mass/expansion to cause traumatic hydrostatic damage. A .223 Remington fired out of a rifle is far more lethal than an .45 ACP fired out of damn near anything for a reason.

So the discussion is, do you want a slightly to moderately more lethal round, or do I simply want more rounds. That was the 9mm vs 45 ACP argument.

Now, the formula changes when the target changes. Are you worried about large, dangerous animals Then you may want to invest far more into the hand-cannon side of things. Wanting to punch through light cover might change your cartridge choice again. Similarly if you are choosing a sidearm for fighting a war, your target distance will probably be significantly different than a typical self-defense scenario.

So is .30 Super Carry a decent cartridge. Sure. Is it going to replace 9mm? probably not.

But what do I know? I EDC a 10mm Glock 20, and that obviously isn't the height of concealed carry wisdom.
 
.30 would have to be really fucking special to take on 9mm, and it just isn't. There's nothing wrong with new shit but I've said it before, modern 9mm loads are just too versatile. We're talking about a round that has had over 100 years of active development on it.




A .223 Remington fired out of a rifle is far more lethal than an .45 ACP fired out of damn near anything for a reason.

But what do I know? I EDC a 10mm Glock 20, and that obviously isn't the height of concealed carry wisdom
The FBI Miami shootout found out the above the hard way and it directly led to the development of .40 S&W and 10mm, so you can thank two bank robbers carrying a mini-14 and shooting glowies for that.
 
There's people who still insist the lesson from that fuckup was bigger pistols, and that it wasn't just a matter of grave tactical retardation.
The lesson was don't bring a fucking pistol to a rifle fight. I'd say it was learned given how many cops have ARs and rifle plates in their cruisers. The only two agents that day who had something other than a pistol or shotgun (One had an MP5, the other had a Colt. I think a Commando but I don't fully recall) weren't at the scene of the chase or crash. None of the FBI guys were wearing their issued body armor.

The FBI also denied for years that the problem was their doctrine or weaponry at the time. Oh no, the mighty FBI cannot ever be wrong.

I will say, that whole shootout makes for fascinating reading if you guys ever want to learn about what modern tactics and equipment evolved from. The North Hollywood shoot out is another one but Miami is what got the ball really rolling. It's why we have the FBI ballistic test now.

EDIT :

This is the book one of the surviving agents wrote about the engagement : FBI Miami Firefight
 
Last edited:
I'm going to bring up old shit. Anyone remember Hoss USMC? Someone posted a video about him two months ago, apparently he e-begged crowdfunded a documentary about militias in America, to the surprise of absolutely no one he fumbled it - and most likely because he had no experience in production so he couldn't deliver despite having the footage, the uploader theorizes the audio is probably ass, etc.
Hoss has an active facebook page https://www.facebook.com/ithouston

So is .30 Super Carry a decent cartridge. Sure. Is it going to replace 9mm? probably not.
I don't see it as a 9mm replacement, I see it as a way to bridge the gap between 9mm and 380.
30 Super Carry is too powerful for the micro 380s but on subcompact locked breech pistols it actually gives a capacity advantage and it's designed from the ground up with FBI specs in mind. Save for a few exceptions a lot of .380 carry ammo is weirdly inconsistent at meeting penetration standards.
 
I don't see it as a 9mm replacement, I see it as a way to bridge the gap between 9mm and 380.
30 Super Carry is too powerful for the micro 380s but on subcompact locked breech pistols it actually gives a capacity advantage and it's designed from the ground up with FBI specs in mind. Save for a few exceptions a lot of .380 carry ammo is weirdly inconsistent at meeting penetration standards.
That's the one situation I'd get a .30 Super Carry for. If I wanted a carry pistol as small as a .380, but with more oomph than .380 and more capacity than a 9mm of the same size. That's a very specific use case, but most people don't get to collect guns (hell, I limit myself to a very small amount) so if that sounds attractive to someone they might as well go for it.

Actually, I lie. I'd get one for plinking, because I like plinking. But I already have a 9mm pistol for that so my money will remain in my wallet.
 
Back