My personal theory on transgenderism as a phenomenon basically comes down to the idea of balance, where the essentialisms of male and female become less defined socially, leading to a mass confusion, particularly in the male population. In short. I believe that women unsexing themselves in both appearance and demeanor, and the dramatic falling-away of classical femininity, adopting more classically masculine personas to insert themselves into the modern world and to be "equal to men" (which is an impossible goal, because no two individuals are equal, let alone the largest group identities being equal to one another) has created a sort of social vacuum that is being filled by a subset of men who are adopting the classically feminine mannerisms and dispositions.
Obviously this is completely unstable and unsustainable, it's a psychotic phenomenon but one which has happened before and there are three key points that give a little bit of validity to this theory.
A: Historical
In every prior civilization we know of, Rome, Greece Epochs (Cycladic Period
, The Minoan Civilization,), etc etc. has experienced a sort of transgender renascence prior to the collapse of their civilizations.
Camille Paglia talks and writes about this a lot. The period of androgyny as civilizations peak and the external stressors and challenges of life are subordinated to technology/labor efficiency.
B: Contemporary Anecdotes
In societies and civilizations which are still "developing" this phenomenon does not exist. Transgenderism does not exist in Myanmar for example the way it exists in the ultra-cosmopolian Tokyo; similarly you can even look at the more isolated parts of Japan and see the same, compare Tokyo to Ikoma in Nara Prefecture.
Or compare Sweden to Hungary., or look at Western Asia, like Uzbekestan and compare them to their more developed counterparts.
tl;dr, the more traditionally defined the sexes are in their social roles (men as the leaders, the authority, the protectors, developers, etc / women as the caregivers, homemakers, child bearers, etc) the less transgender ideology exists.
C: Look at the responses Western developed women have to transgenderism and read between the lines a little bit, ignore the highly politicized aspects of the phenomenon and think only about the Western female response to the social/interpersonal element. They call it "misogynistic" because, to them, these men are adopting behaviors that these women have been conditioned their entire lives to reject.
Whether or not trannies are
good at it or not is not really relevant, what
is relevant is that they, by and large, at least from what can be observed, is that they attempt to mimic hyper-feminine personas that they, as men, associate with what is feminine, IE; being submissive, a fixation of aesthetics.
You can see this in the potentially valid criticism that troons dress inappropriate for their age; IE, like tweenage princesses, but ultimately (again apart from the very valid political arguments RE; bathrooms and sports) the inherent rage, I see, stems from being confronted with A) the reality of what men actually want women to be, which they are not, and B) the confrontation of the self, being mocked by a crude immitation of the femininity western women have, largely, abandoned.
TL;DR
Feminism and the depersonalization of the feminine Self to better assimilate women into the working world, in addition to the loud, obnoxious nigger culture that women consume: (fucking Lizzo lmao)
have been the biggest contributing factors in the emergence of the transgender ideology.
To recap.
A) Civilizations that become so socially advanced to allow for philosophy and thinking instead of harvesting and gathering the necessities for life inevitably descend into cosmopolitanism where the very essence of masculinity (The warrior, the farmer, the law, the authority,) become less vital and therefore less valued, see a shift from the heroic depictions of man to a more mellow, androgynous, woman-like depiction of the ideal Man.
B) Civilizations which retain strict traditions and religious or moral beliefs or more traditional/archaic lifestyles (the nomads of North Africa, the Western Asians, Tibetans, etc) have clearly defined gender roles that enforce femininity in the female population through natural selection by the male population, IE; women who do not behave as expected are not married, do not reproduce.
C) Feminism in the west is the proximate cause of the breakdowns in these traditional lifestyles which has created the social vacuum that a small population of men will fill by necessity because Masculinity and Femininity are necessary functions of the human experience and both are needed for a sustainable civilization.
The irony now is that unsexed, defeminized women are demanding the essence of the male, the masculine energy, the warrior/protector to intervene when men dressed like women enter their bathrooms without addressing the proximate cause of the event in the first place.
TL;DR
The more women act like women, and the more respect women give to the masculine counterpart of their femininity the fewer trannies there will be.
