- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
If you were really free you could kill yourself or starve yourself quite easily.Yeah! If free will was real then I could fly if I really wanted to! And eat cake all day without getting fat! Free will is a scam!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you were really free you could kill yourself or starve yourself quite easily.Yeah! If free will was real then I could fly if I really wanted to! And eat cake all day without getting fat! Free will is a scam!
Then it's not much good as a litmus test.
The Bible is against that. It has no respect for those who cry "Lord! Lord!" but have no love in their hears. No respect for laws like that especially.
So why emulate that?
So why are so many rural areas miserable and in decline despite the prevalence of fundamentalist Christianity there?
I could kill myself relatively easily, yes. Starving might involve a little more forethought but I'm sure I could strand myself somewhere with no food and no way to procure any.If you were really free you could kill yourself or starve yourself quite easily.
I could kill myself relatively easily, yes. Starving might involve a little more forethought but I'm sure I could strand myself somewhere with no food and no way to procure any.
What's your point?
Spergs think that being bound by the laws of nature means they're not truly free and they don't see that they're really just highlighting their own inability to cope with reality.
Nigger the thread is about politicians recognizing the natural bounds of human freedom and will, not discussing whether instincts preclude free-will. You can eat or you can not eat. The government's job is to recognize that is between you, yourself, and God and not interfere.What do think of the notion that when you say I could kill myself quite easily, I then say that's complete rubbish and you could not kill yourself quite easily?
Does that even register?
As for bound by laws of nature, yes you're right. However gravity is one thing, permanent, not changing, ever. Literally a feature of space / time. Overriding your basic instinct to eat and breathe is possible, but its unlikely you could do it easily. However, in some circumstances you certainly could. Now, in that sense, is that a tight bind on you? If say, yes. Because when you're free of the need to live there is a whole lot of cool stuff you could do before you go.
Like, 3 people i've met in my life which have preached almost the same idea?I used to think the same way, but it's not about an afterlife. Following religion for the simple hope that you will go somewhere else later is not pious at all. I would appreciate if you read the OP because you're really far off base of what I'm talking about.
Anecdotal experiences are a poor reflection of reality. I've had many missionaries and regular people alike discuss God with me, and none have threatened that I will go to hell. The worst I've ever gotten is complete bafflement that I get through my day without keeping Jesus in my heart.Like, 3 people i've met in my life which have preached almost the same idea?
I don't like to being reminder about if i don't follow some religion i'm going to hell when the same catholic doctrine says about doing the greater good without believing in God gives you a chance to met heaven or whatever they believe.
Take your own advice and be aware of your own hubris.Like, 3 people i've met in my life which have preached almost the same idea?
I don't like to being reminder about if i don't follow some religion i'm going to hell when the same catholic doctrine says about doing the greater good without believing in God gives you a chance to met heaven or whatever they believe.
So when will you address the fundamental principle of what I'm saying instead of attacking the substance for being disagreeable to you, @MT Foxtrot? You're arguing with people who are often well-entrenched in their beliefs and station in life and have put a lot of thought into it. Parroting Democratic propaganda about how religion = retards isn't really doing anything to expand on the issue.
Nigger the thread is about politicians recognizing the natural bounds of human freedom and will, not discussing whether instincts preclude free-will. You can eat or you can not eat. The government's job is to recognize that is between you, yourself, and God and not interfere.
If I had the will to do so, it would be a relatively simple task.What do think of the notion that when you say I could kill myself quite easily, I then say that's complete rubbish and you could not kill yourself quite easily?
This is really just word salad.As for bound by laws of nature, yes you're right. However gravity is one thing, permanent, not changing, ever. Literally a feature of space / time. Overriding your basic instinct to eat and breathe is possible, but its unlikely you could do it easily. However, in some circumstances you certainly could. Now, in that sense, is that a tight bind on you? If say, yes. Because when you're free of the need to live there is a whole lot of cool stuff you could do before you go.
If I had the will to do so, it would be a relatively simple task.
This is really just word salad.
I've got a question: if you don't have free will, why do you bother saying anything? It's all just predetermined by your neurochemistry and life experiences. I can dismiss what you say quite easily because you've claimed to be no better than a chatbot.
Someone’s mad that they don’t have rebuttal.Can a faggot produce a post so stupid that even he can't post it?
lmao imagine seething over the truthExile so we don't need to hear your warmed-over fedora takes.