- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
Come to think of it, I've had one job where contractions were entirely forbidden, even in quotations.
Lol, that's absurd. I can get the ban on contractions in formal communications (and agree that it is not formal), but banning preserving quoted language for that reason?

I've also experienced a work environment that banned "and/or." So people wrote, "and or." Tf? I think they missed the point. First of all, "and/or" is sometimes exactly what is needed. That said, I can get why they might have wanted to eliminate/ minimize it if it would or could cause confusion among certain readers or was being used unthoughtfully, but "and or" without the "/" is not only not better, but also isn't a thing.... Form over substance is stooopid.