- Joined
- Oct 31, 2019
They didn't own any but at least one was a slave-catcher who wrangled escaping negros & returned them for a bounty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rather the opposite, on one side of my family. I'm a direct descendent of Harriet Beecher Stowe. The other side is a quarter Choctaw, so who knows there.
Doxed!One of my ancestors is this dude, who, along with killing many Indians and scheming millions of acres of land from them, was born on a plantation with about 110 slaves.
would you give them the receipt and ask your money back?My maternal grandmother was really into genealogy and while researching some of her ancestors not only found out they had slaves, she found literal receipts for their purchase.
I'd really like to find out if they have any decedents so I can check up on them, see how they turned out.
I like to read old shit from time to time. Old history books from the period, stuff like that. It turns out, slave owners were really nice people who were upstanding members of society and treated their slaves very well. Corporal punishment was extremely rare, almost to the point where it never happened. You didn't want to risk injuring your employees, that would be stupid. The number one punishment for unruly slaves was threatening to sell them without their family. That would usually get them right in line. Another tactic was telling them you would sell them to some guy in Louisiana, because the climate was so hot that most slaves would die after working there for awhile. The slaves knew this, and would beg and plead to be allowed to remain in the North.They didn't own any but at least one was a slave-catcher who wrangled escaping negros & returned them for a bounty.
I'd say it's much higher than that even. Probably 95% or more.probably well over 80% of whites have no slave owning ancestors.
God yes.would you give them the receipt and ask your money back?
I can't give a source atm, but I believe it was around 1.8% where as 8/10 jewish households in the south had slaves at the height of slavery.I'd say it's much higher than that even. Probably 95% or more.
I remember reading a jewish publication trying to justify that fact. They couldn't deny it, because it's true and there are records, so they said something like, "Well, Jews are urban people who lived in the city. And city dwellers had more slaves because they needed them."I can't give a source atm, but I believe it was around 1.8% where as 8/10 jewish households in the south had slaves at the height of slavery.
I remember Larry David went on one of those genealogy shows and, while his mom's side of the family was almost entirely wiped out in the Holocaust, his dad's side of the family were some of the earliest Jewish settlers in Alabama, and one of his ancestors had, on record, two slaves: one woman and one 8-year-old girl.I can't give a source atm, but I believe it was around 1.8% where as 8/10 jewish households in the south had slaves at the height of slavery.
The slave trade largest port at the height of slavery was Newport Rhode Island. Know what was built there too? The first Synagogue. If you know where to look, there's plenty of documentation from back then penned by jews about running the auctions. They would close on Saturdays for Shabbat.