- Joined
- Jan 22, 2018
Bretty gud list.
This one disgusted me so damn much as a kid. Seeing the giant alien bug moving from one body to another was so damn gross, then the last scene is hilarious and gross at the same time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bretty gud list.
This inspired me to read actual spoilers for the movie. If I had gone to see this in the theater, I would have been fucking livid. Maybe that was Raimi's goal? I won't post anything, but I do suggest if you are the type who is upset by "girls rule/guys drool" plots, you should probably at least rethink seeing it.No, and tbh having watched a trailer, motivated by your comment, I don't think it really was marketed that way. It's Misery meets Castaway, but make it a dark comedy. As I was watching the movie I realized they could not have made this with reversed genders.
I am curious to know your opinion on the girls rule/guys drool messaging of Misery.This inspired me to read actual spoilers for the movie. If I had gone to see this in the theater, I would have been fucking livid. Maybe that was Raimi's goal? I won't post anything, but I do suggest if you are the type who is upset by "girls rule/guys drool" plots, you should probably at least rethink seeing it.
Sinners is such a mess of a movie and half of it is a boring slog to get to the vampires, which then suck. It only received the praise it did because it's about blacks in the South. I do remember liking the cinematography but that's all the positives I can think of.Saw Sinners: can someone explain to me what I'm missing? It was boring as fuck and then the vampire horror action was so muddy and rushed and incomprehensible I thought someone was playing a trick on me. How the fuck did this get so much love? It's mediocre at best. Is it really that easy to trick fags into throwing accolades at your movie if you make a totally average mash-up of genre flicks but slap old-timey negros into it?
I think the only scene I enjoyed was when they did the lord of the danse macabre because at least that felt unique in what was up to that point a Grade A snoozefest. That and SAMMMMMY! Just ridiculous. Also the tacked on ending where Mike shoots up the KKK... I thought I was going to die of cringe. Totally unearned.
How the fuck do you ripoff from Dusk Till Dawn so obviously yet manage to make something so dull and unfun?
even that is half-assedSinners is such a mess of a movie and half of it is a boring slog to get to the vampires, which then suck. It only received the praise it did because it's about blacks in the South. I do remember liking the cinematography but that's all the positives I can think of.
I'm gonna be honest I don't remember any bird but your anger about it made me laugheven that is half-assed
like the bird that flies by near the start and NEVER COMES UP AGAIN
if that was supposed to be something it needed to be a thing
if that was an accident retake the shot without the fucking bird
See, I expected that the supernatural shit was all a hallucination from her husband drugging her.I kinda liked that one, nice low-key dad thriller style with some supernatural plastered over it.
See, I expected that the supernatural shit was all a hallucination from her husband drugging her.
Or at least they should have left some of it ambiguous.
First hour: Really good. Good atmosphere, good building of suspense, good seeding in of different clues.
Second hour: Meh. And I thought the first part of the ending where she's in the tub was genuinely freaky while everything that happened after that was anticlimactic.
I actually think the opposite. When you have a video game adaptation like this, you either lean completely your own way or you lean very hard into the gameplay. He should've leaned harder into the game since he didn't have the budget to really do his own thing. It could've been scarier. He's just using black and white static images which are very easy to make. If he does another movie, he should hire an editor.Although I still found it boring, upon further reflection I can acquiesce that it is an interesting premise for a movie. I would have preferred a more... creative adaptation, rather than what is basically gameplay portrayed in film.
Do you guys not remember Drag Me To Hell? It's Sam Raimi. He does not give a shit. His one goal and his only goal, is to entertain and hyuck it up every chance he gets. He will happily do anything to troll if he thinks it's funny. The movies don't matter, just entertain.This inspired me to read actual spoilers for the movie. If I had gone to see this in the theater, I would have been fucking livid. Maybe that was Raimi's goal?
Oh I can tell you why you hated it. You didn't see it theaters. What made Sinners great was the cinematography. It's an absolutely beautiful movie, and if you look back through this thread I say several times that once it's off the big screen, it would lose something. You just confirmed that's the case. It ain't a small screen movie. You either saw it in theaters and could see past its flaws and loved it, or you saw it on a small screen and thought it was goofy as all hell.How the fuck do you ripoff from Dusk Till Dawn so obviously yet manage to make something so dull and unfun?
Isn't the gameplay just clicking around, looking at the map to navigate and take pictures? Deal with the occasional fire? All of that is represented in the movie.He should've leaned harder into the game since he didn't have the budget to really do his own thing.
The world outside in the blood ocean is a bit more lively in the game. There's more weird stuff down there than just that one monster.Isn't the gameplay just clicking around, looking at the map to navigate and take pictures? Deal with the occasional fire? All of that is represented in the movie.
The cinematography and lighting was the only good thing about it! I don't disagree it probably would have popped nicely on the silver screen but if I wanted to just see pretty pictures I'd go to an art gallery. I just cannot understand why people are saying they loved it so much when I think that everything aside from the mise-en-scene was really not impressive in the least.You either saw it in theaters and could see past its flaws and loved it, or you saw it on a small screen and thought it was goofy as all hell.
Again, for some movies the experience really just is THAT different. There's something about the big screen, surround sound that make things seem more epic than they ever could in a home viewing. Sinners just happens to be an excellent example of this phenomenon.I just cannot understand why people are saying they loved it so much when I think that everything aside from the mise-en-scene was really not impressive in the least.
I saw Presumed Innocent again a couple months ago and it was SO GOOD, like I remembered it being good but I didn't remember it being GREAT. Holds up so well.I think I interpreted it through established disingenuous storytelling devices of thrillers like Presumed Innocent, where you're led to believe one thing to the point that a twist at the end can never fully satisfy due to the weight of "no, the story is totally going in this direction, look at all this evidence for that reading of it". I suspect I wasn't taking the film seriously and just enjoying the atmosphere. I assume they were trying to have their cake and eat it, with the did-he-or-didn't-he dynamic while trying to find a surprising way to wrap it up. That type of slack storytelling is very late 90s/early 00s and definitely requires just vibing through it (eg. Gothika, for a worse example).