J.K. Rowling needs to stop messing with Harry Potter - A general STFU J.K. Rowling MegaThread <3

I think people take these books way more seriously than JK Rowling does. So many lose their shit or get butthurt becuase of the changes she has made, like turning characters gay or black, but she doesn't give a fuck becuase she already published what she wanted and now only has to keep people talking. Negative attention is still attention and these days that works wonders for sales.

No, she tries to write new stuff, but no one likes it. She even tried to make an encyclopaedia / guide book but it blew up in her face because Rowling tried to add American wizards to the lore. She was yelled at for appropriatingNative American culture, but you know that if she had made them a carbon copy of Hogwarts, they would have been attacked for erasure of native culture.
 
It's never been about the food. People didn't really care that McDonalds or other food franchises made people fat, just that they made money out of it because they hated corporatism and how these people held any power (especially monetary power) in America.

They stopped caring because these corporations found an amazing shield: they joined social causes. It doesn't matter if McDonalds or KFC or Wendys or anyone has killed more people than Mao (not that SJWs care about all the deaths caused by Mao), it matters that they post the Rainbow Flag every June each year. That makes them good and virtuous and that's why they love them instead of those Chick-fil-A biggots who hate gays.

Same way, I'm starting to believe these people never cared about the plot of Harry Potter. The first generation of readers maybe did, but SJWs didn't. They only cared how much they could project themselves into these books. Like, they saw a character such as Lupin, who's charismatic, smart, compassionate, and well beloved by his friends, and said "he's an allegory for being gay, and I'm gay, so we're exactly the same! I stan!".

That's more point, it's about self aggrandizement for these people, not solving actual problems.

Like Morgan Spurlock and his Super Size Me documentary, which not only was he later outed as a sex pest, but nobody could replicate the results of his "experiment" implying it was all BS anyway.
 
That's more point, it's about self aggrandizement for these people, not solving actual problems.

Like Morgan Spurlock and his Super Size Me documentary, which not only was he later outed as a sex pest, but nobody could replicate the results of his "experiment" implying it was all BS anyway.
He conveniently forgot to include the fact that he was an alcoholic and on a vegan diet before the Super Size Me experiment, which is a much better explanation for why he was puking and having liver problems than LOL MCDONALDS DID IT
 
He conveniently forgot to include the fact that he was an alcoholic and on a vegan diet before the Super Size Me experiment, which is a much better explanation for why he was puking and having liver problems than LOL MCDONALDS DID IT
Don't forget the bizarre inclusion of Don Gorske, who ate at least 3 Big Macs a day for literal decades and seemed to be in good shape.
 
That's more point, it's about self aggrandizement for these people, not solving actual problems.

Like Morgan Spurlock and his Super Size Me documentary, which not only was he later outed as a sex pest, but nobody could replicate the results of his "experiment" implying it was all BS anyway.
When Super Size Me came out there was some video he did showing how McDs fries take much longer to decay than they should. A teacher I had tried recreating this in the classroom with us to see if that was true, and the McD's fries spoiled at roughly the same rate as some homemade ones.
No, she tries to write new stuff, but no one likes it. She even tried to make an encyclopaedia / guide book but it blew up in her face because Rowling tried to add American wizards to the lore. She was yelled at for appropriatingNative American culture, but you know that if she had made them a carbon copy of Hogwarts, they would have been attacked for erasure of native culture.
I remember that chimpout. People were also angry at Native traditions being placed into a fictional world, because somehow that implies they aren't real. I guess owls don't exist either since they're in the books too.
 

Would Lord Voldemort have voted for Brexit? JK Rowling reveals Harry Potter's nemesis is a 'nationalist' and says novels deal with racism
  • JK Rowling says her Dark Lord Voldemort is an ‘authoritarian’ and a 'nationalist'
  • The author has also refused to work with the Government on literacy initiatives
  • Miss Rowling says that she does not want pupils to be forced to read her books
  • She revealed that she is currently working on a new book for youngsters
By PAUL REVOIR MEDIA EDITOR FOR THE DAILY MAIL

PUBLISHED: 00:00 GMT, 23 December 2019 | UPDATED: 07:51 GMT, 23 December 2019


JK Rowling has described wizard villain Lord Voldemort as a ‘nationalist’ and says her Harry Potter books deal with racism.
The author – who was subjected to abuse by nationalist Scots during the 2014 independence referendum – described her ‘Dark Lord’ creation as an ‘authoritarian’.
Appearing on the Christmas special of Radio 4’s The Museum of Curiosity, she also said she has repeatedly refused to work with the Government on literacy initiatives because she does not want pupils to be forced to read her books.

JK Rowling has described wizard villain Lord Voldemort as a ‘nationalist’ and says her Harry Potter books deal with racism. The author she is currently working on a new book for youngsters
But she delighted fans by revealing that she is currently working on a new book for youngsters.
She told the programme, which airs this evening at 6.15pm: ‘I have a half-written children’s book where I’m going back into a completely invented world that I’ve sort of got half-finished.’
Asked about studies which had found those who read her Potter books had more empathy and tolerance, the 54-year-old replied: ‘Obviously those themes are deeply embedded within the books. Ideas of being different, racism is obviously there in allegorical form, as totalitarianism is there, because Voldemort is obviously an authoritarian. I wouldn’t say he’s a populist, but he’s a kind of nationalist.’

Miss Rowling faced abuse after she donated £1million to the anti-independence campaign to stop Scotland breaking away from the UK.
She had compared extreme critics of her stance to Harry Potter’s enemies the ‘Death Eaters’.
She also ran into a storm last week when she backed a woman sacked for suggesting transgender people cannot change their sex.
 
I love how Rowling tried so, so hard to be woke but now the left is calling her a nazi. Now that she's officially been branded a TERF, lefties are claiming Griffindors are dirty stinky conservatives.

antifags.png


Other complaints I've seen floating around:
HARRY POTTER GROWS UP TO BE A FUCKING COP
Goblins are a racist analogy for the jews!!
House elves glorify slavery!
Werewolves were a metaphor for homos with AIDS!
Cho Chang sounds like ching chong nip nong therefore it's racist!
Rita Skeeter was meant to paint transpeople in a bad light! There's one line in the book where it says she has man hands, therefore she's trans!!

No, she tries to write new stuff, but no one likes it. She even tried to make an encyclopaedia / guide book but it blew up in her face because Rowling tried to add American wizards to the lore. She was yelled at for appropriatingNative American culture, but you know that if she had made them a carbon copy of Hogwarts, they would have been attacked for erasure of native culture.
She should've hired native Americans to write the American school, hired Japanese people to write the Jap school and hired Africans to write the African school. Then she should have written stories based on what they came up with and asked them to proofread her work. When people try to write about cultures they don't know, the result is always retarded.
 
Last edited:

Voldemort was right for wanting to keep the muggles out since they persecuted wizards and witches in the past and would no doubt do it again. Hell, muggles still fight over skin color, you think they can handle not having magic and feeling inferior? They would nuke the whole damn wizarding world to bits if the secret came out. So he was right even though he was a dirty halfblood himself.
 
Voldemort was right for wanting to keep the muggles out since they persecuted wizards and witches in the past and would no doubt do it again. Hell, muggles still fight over skin color, you think they can handle not having magic and feeling inferior? They would nuke the whole damn wizarding world to bits if the secret came out. So he was right even though he was a dirty halfblood himself.
What's stopping the families of mudbloods from spilling the beans and telling other muggles about the wizarding world, again? Was there a silencing charm or something? If not, I can totally see why Voldemort didn't like mudbloods since they were a risk.
 
I shit you not, the British Government, but you'll have to listen to this radio show for the details: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000ckw7

Maybe it's 'cause I'm not a Eurofag, but I'm only twelve minutes in and it hasn't been funny once. I thought British humor was more witty and dry than this "I sound like I'm full of cobwebs" stuffiness?

But that's some cringe.
 
What's stopping the families of mudbloods from spilling the beans and telling other muggles about the wizarding world, again? Was there a silencing charm or something? If not, I can totally see why Voldemort didn't like mudbloods since they were a risk.

Maybe they're counting on people not believing that there's a hidden magical world. It sounds like a conspiracy theory and we know what most people think of those.
 
Voldemort did nothing wrong.

Also Harry Potter was always cucked, it's literally a gigantic anti-racist sperg out. Rowling is good at creating lovable characters and interactions between those characters (it's why I think HP is so popular and isn't truly awful) but she's the living definition of the NPC meme.

Her struggling to twist stories into lefty propaganda was never a surprise, it's always been a part of her personality.
 
Maybe it's 'cause I'm not a Eurofag, but I'm only twelve minutes in and it hasn't been funny once. I thought British humor was more witty and dry than this "I sound like I'm full of cobwebs" stuffiness?

But that's some cringe.
Radio 4 for ya.
I'm going to shill for R4 here: 6:30pm is traditionally a comedy slot, but this show has somehow inveigled it's way into it, probably due to John Lloyd's history with Douglas Adams et al. Britbong radio is usually much better than this shit.

Edit: Glyn Johns made me remember Odgens' Nutgone Flake exists, which is a good thing.
 
Back