Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289 / 87Blue - Brony, furry, gets banned everywhere, defends pedophiles, transexuals, and pedophile transexuals, to his last breath and needs others to do the arguing for him

[teriyakiburns]

Jacob here used to attempt to debate others on the subject of troonism in Jessica Yaniv articles.....View attachment 2589486View attachment 2589487
@ryu289 Have you fapped to Yaniv? The pedo-troon? Why you defending them?

There is also a fascinating comment he left in a discussion
View attachment 2589501
The subject was "Feds charge transgender activist with raping 4-year old on video"
This was the only comment he left.

Do you believe you are not a pedo or MAP cause you are not a christian? Isn't this awfully discriminatory of you considering 50% of the world is christian?

He posted on The Other McCain? Oh shit, I knew I recognised his username from somewhere else!

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

Jacob here used to attempt to debate others on the subject of troonism in Jessica Yaniv articles.....View attachment 2589486View attachment 2589487
@ryu289 Have you fapped to Yaniv? The pedo-troon? Why you defending them?

There is also a fascinating comment he left in a discussion
View attachment 2589501
The subject was "Feds charge transgender activist with raping 4-year old on video"
This was the only comment he left.

Do you believe you are not a pedo or MAP cause you are not a christian? Isn't this awfully discriminatory of you considering 50% of the world is christian?

So much cope. Levels of cope I didn’t think possible but here we are.

 

[Green-Machine]

He posted on The Other McCain? Oh shit, I knew I recognised his username from somewhere else!

his username had the same effect on me, until someone posted an image of him acting entitled in the Zack vs Wade stuff, I'm assuming that is what it was. Before TUG's true colors shown through, I use to watch his livestreams and I remember seeing Jacob's name show up a few times when they were talking about comic stuff

 

[fishercat]

View attachment 2588700

I feel genuine repulse. I am vomit.

Do his arms hurt from reaching that far?

 

[Newman's Own]

Archiving before it gets edited:

View attachment 2587888View attachment 2587886View attachment 2587884

This is a major tell right here. Cilleystring says an "attraction to children" is predatory. (normal people understand this because they understand an attraction to any predatory behavior even if not acted on is still a predatory urge)

Jacob's response is to reframe "attraction to children" as "looking at depictions of women" to lessen the impact of it being about innocent children who can't have agency. I don't know what the psychological term for this is (transference?) but he's also consciously and/or subconsciously equating adult women with children in the context of sexual attraction particularly (and tellingly) as objects to be viewed for sexual purposes in this context.

One could reasonably infer from this and previous statements by Jacob that he sees the children he lusts for as capable of adult level consent on some level out of delusion or more likely to assuage his guilty conscience or justify his actions.

Jacob also makes the semantic leap to frame predatory urges as not predatory if not acted upon. Of course predatory urges are predatory, @ryu289, just as the urge to commit homicide is homicidal.

I don't think it's possible to dig a hole deep enough.

 

[GenociderSyo]

Should see how much time he spend staring at this thread, but he will never respond to it because the hole's so deep he cannot fight his way out.

 

[fishercat]

Oh, also adults only wanting to fuck other adults is literally normal. It is the norm among humans to not want to fuck kids. Fucking kids is considered a paraphilia for multiple reasons. It's not normal, it's dangerous, and it harms people.

So yes, getting off to children is not normal.

 

[IKOL]

There is also a fascinating comment he left in a discussion

As a Catholic, I'm deeply insulted by his comment.

Oh, also adults only wanting to fuck other adults is literally normal.

Unless we're speaking of enormous age gaps resulting in young fucks grands. As gross as this sounds one is no better than pedo shit.

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

View attachment 2590084

This is a major tell right here. Cilleystring says an "attraction to children" is predatory. (normal people understand this because they understand an attraction to any predatory behavior even if not acted on is still a predatory urge)

Jacob's response is to reframe "attraction to children" as "looking at depictions of women" to lessen the impact of it being about innocent children who can't have agency. I don't know what the psychological term for this is (transference?) but he's also consciously and/or subconsciously equating adult women with children in the context of sexual attraction particularly (and tellingly) as objects to be viewed for sexual purposes in this context.

One could reasonably infer from this and previous statements by Jacob that he sees the children he lusts for as capable of adult level consent on some level out of delusion or more likely to assuage his guilty conscience or justify his actions.

Jacob also makes the semantic leap to frame predatory urges as not predatory if not acted upon. Of course predatory urges are predatory, @ryu289, just as the urge to commit homicide is homicidal.

I don't think it's possible to dig a hole deep enough.

Lol, am I seeing this right? He is using the loli-defense?

"Oh it is only ficitonal characters. Please disregard all my previous statements, hankering for transformation art of young characters. Did I mention that it is a fetish? Oh well! Oh, and I may have said 6 years ago I believe adolescent can consent to sex with and adult but that is entirely out of context!!

I just fap to true and honest fictional monster-girls. Or as you know them. Trannies. "
-Jacob Blaustein aka Ryu238/ Ryu289 2021-

As a Catholic, I'm deeply insulted by his comment.


Unless we're speaking of enormous age gaps resulting in young fucks grands. As gross as this sounds one is no better than pedo shit.

He calls christians 'Christfags'. Cause he is such an edgy-boi! who is raking in that fictional child transformation pussy (wow there is a sentence I never thought I'd write....but here we are)

@ryu289 are you a virgin?

 

[GenociderSyo]

 

[IKOL]

He calls christians 'Christfags'.

'Christfags'.

Okay that's the most idiotic yet unreasonably hilarious word and wannabe-insult I ever heard trough my internet endeavors. @ryu289 why are you such a brain damaged, son?

View attachment 2590469

Oi look ma', I'm on TeeWhee!
Ahem... I mean, his response makes no fucking sense and I sincerely wish to commit the US federal crime but do the right thing and mutilate that bitch.

 

[Sprate Header]

View attachment 2590468

Okay that's the most idiotic yet unreasonably hilarious word and wannabe-insult I ever heard trough my internet endeavors. @ryu289 why are you such a brain damaged, son?

I thought "Christfag" was an insult reserved for use by edgelord /pol/lacks that didn't like rubbing elbows with Catholics when discussing Hyperborea and the Fourth Reich, wtf are you doing using that on Reddit, @ryu289?

 

[ryu289]

Lol "disregard all my pedo defending and pedo acceptance. I'm not the pedo! You guys are!"

How am I defending Pedophilia now? The moment you declared me as such, you decided that anything I say is a denial and that me pointing out how things aren't pedophila ends up being ignored. None of you care about the content of what was said or the context of when it was said.

After all, if I went out of my way to point out that gays aren't pedophiles, wouldn't that prove that I don't support it since I didn't say 'so what'? Doesn't that show a contradiction in your assertions?

All you did was copy and paste the entire article and then say bowel fluids don't have poop in them and penises can magically become vaginas.

You were the only one mentioning bowel fluids. I suspect you have a fetish at this point. And the article was a review of studies which proved my point, but you lied about what was in it.

I don't know how you can use a forum dedicated to discussing every single topic and STILL manage to piss people off with you sperging, you already got a containment thread but continued to sperg so much they outright suspended you? Multiple times? Amazing

Simple, they believed I was JAQing off and though I was arguing in bad faith. In reality, I didn't understand the topics well back then and was asking for help, but they had a bad problem with trolls on the site and decided to lump me in with them. Despite them saying they wanted open discussion they really didn't.

Found another account

Where I am not banned. Good work.

Also found some phonenumbers, 2nd screenshot is some years old so that's why the age is different

Not my phone numbers.

Also, another example of Ryu defending pedo shit from 2 years ago

I suppose you think nudist colonies are pedophilic? The idea is too caught up in the idea that going nude is the same as being sexual, which isn't true, and far too caught up in shame culture. In short not being ashamed of nudity is not the same as molesting children. This is similiar to the dead horse of "gays are pedos".

Dude, literally nobody has brought this up.

It was brought up in when the op posted this.

I'm pretty sure that it's that logical fallacy some asshole drops a whole bunch links or points and if you don't address all of them,

Actually you addressed none of them nor showed any were wrong.

The only email address I can find is associated to Jacob is listed as dvdblstn@comcast.net which may belong to his father David H Blaustein

Wrong again. Do you think going after my parents makes you heroes?

call me crazy, but I don't think people should be parading children around in drag and whoring them out for tips. And I think those that partake in or support this noncense definitely gain a sexual thrill from it

Not at all. Most drag queens who get tips don't consider themselves whoring themselves out. As for getting a sexual thrill it's something that has no evidence going for it at all.

I remember him back from when OAG was still around, and he was already advocating his pro pedo views there. Glad to see nothing has changed.

On OAG, anything gay was considered pedo by default. Billy kept lying about homosexuality and guys like you lapped it up like sheep

I was saying by your version of events, you're such a pants-shitting retard that you bought into the pedophile "kid-fucking-is-awesome" narrative hook, line, and sinker because they dressed it up all nice and purdy in scientific-sounding language.

That wasn't why. I found no study that showed that, but I was in an extreme libertarian style "consent is all that matters" mindset. Do you find any evidence that my views were influence by "scienctific-sounding language"?

Lol @ryu289 trying to get the parler watch personal army on us. If you don't feel like you've done anything wrong here and we're the bad guys why don't you link them this thread?

I am not sending them to attack you. They don't do that. I do think you are projecting. But you are right. I will get their opinion.

"You guys, I'm not a pedophile (anymore)! However, me being naked in front of a crossdressing child is actually a good thing."

Why did you ignore me saying:

In addition studies into the naturist movement shows that nudity in of itself has no ill effects on children and isn't seen as inherently sexual.

I mean if you can't prove these wrong that nudity isn't hurting, let alone sexualizing children, then how can you say it is pedophila, i.e. doing sexual acts to children? Besides most child molesters don't care for that.

I might be being autistic here but this was pretty much an outright confession towards still being a pedophile

BY me pointing out how it isn't pedophila? Right...Doppio you are being a moron.

"SO WHAT IF I SAID ITS OKAY TO FUCK KIDS THAT ONE TIME"

Because it doesn't represent my views now duh.

Fair enough, your punishment for that one time is a bullet through the skull, don't worry it'll be the one time, i pinky promise.

You guys are pretty Orwellian at this point. Worse than Fundamentalist Christians. I mean all you have is me giving my opinion 6 years ago. You are no better than the people you claim to fight against.

Using the gay community as a scapegoat for pedophilia is considered very homophobic and someone who is so well versed in The Gays should know that.

And you think I don't know this? I am certainly not. I just like correcting misinformation.

@ryu289 as an adult, have you ever engaged in conversation (over the internet or in real life) with people under the age of 18? And if so, what was the nature of these conversations?

Never. Have you?

you fucking retard, your links are, in order: an attack on an older woman that a transwoman was successfully prosecuted over, a mean post, a mean post, a mean post, a mean post and a mean post. Boy, I wish transwomen were just violent in the same way that terfs are!

These are in order: terfs beating up on a transwomen then pretending they were the victims, violent threat, violent threats, violent threats, and oh yes, violent threats, all against trans people. They plan to murder trans people, all the time and threaten violence,

Transwomen have a male pattern of criminality and violence, whether you accept it or cope about it, it's a fact.

Not really. In fact transwomen tend to be disproportionally victimized. Radfems like Julie Bindel (who fyi wants to put cismen into concentration camps) claim Transwomen attack them when surprise!- they keep changing their stories when confronted.

Remember ciswomen rape, murder, plot to murder and rape, commit horrendous hate crimes, threaten children, ect, ect, ect.

Someone on Reddit had to tell him to stop being retarded and stop only looking at sources that agreed with him.

Here's the thing, there was literally no research showing any negative effects of nudity, on it's own, Everyone here assumes that if children see any genatalia in a bathroom, it is because an adult went out of their way to show to the child instead. Ignoring the fact this logic doesn't seem to apply to parents.

Don’t forget to tip the underage strippers.”

Again, none of them were stripping. I swear, its almost as if none of you even research what I said and are just making things up.

Bc I'm bored

Congrats you just showed yourself to be the very degenerate you claim to fight against.

He completely ignored my post where I proved all of his articles wrong and just jumped to responding to other people.

I actually attacked it liar.

Reveling in his links and fiiiinally getting some of those precious likes. And of course he's pro antifa like so many other diddlers

It's interesting that you don't show the post I gave: https://www.reddit.com/r/rpg/commen...e_are_the_ones_crying_cancel_culture/hcgx95d/
You know showing that the alt-right comitts the violence and blames Antifa/BLM?

In fact, he's described in uncomfortable amounts of detail the types of neovaginas he'd like to have sex with.

By uncomfortable you mean literally just say "I would fuck em"

(on top of the kids and dogs he wants to/already has fucked)

Um when did you decide i had fucked any? Let alone want to fuck dogs? Your autism is showing.

(Also, the source he linked actively stated that transgender brains are incredibly alike to normal brains- "the majority of neuroanatomical, neurophysiological, and neurometabolic features in transgenders resemble those of their natal sex rather than those of their experienced gender." Great job reading your sources all the way through!)

You ignored

From extracting and summarizing all the information available, differences were found between cisgender and transgender people in white matter microstructure, volumetric analyses, cortical thickness, and corpus callosum shape," they wrote, adding "in [male to female individuals] it was possible to find traits which are “feminine and demasculinized” and in female to male it was possible to find traits which are “masculine and defeminized.”

Good job ignoring the parts you hate Doppio.
Look here:

By contrast, on “sex-stereotypical tasks,” brain function may already be more similar to gender identity in transgender persons, also before receiving gender-affirming hormone treatment. However, studies continue to be limited by small sample sizes and new initiatives are needed to further elucidate the neurobiology of a ‘brain gender’ (sex-dimorphic change according to one’s gender).

That last bit isn't very important as most of these studies are unable to do better than convivence sampling

However there are ways around that:

Although the neuroanatomy of transgender persons is slowly being charted, findings are presently discrepant. One important factor is the issue of power and low signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio in neuroimaging studies of rare study populations including endocrine or neurological patient groups. The present study assessed whether the reliability of findings across structural anatomical measures including thickness, volume, and surface area could be increased by using two back-to-back within session structural MRI scans in 40 transgender men (TM), 40 transgender women (TW), 30 cisgender men (CM), and 30 cisgender women (CW). Overall, findings in transgender persons were more consistent with at-birth assigned sex in brain volume and surface area while no group differences emerged for cortical thickness. Repeated measures analysis also indicated that having a second scan increased SNR in all ROIs, most notably bilateral frontal poles, accumbens nuclei and putamina. Furthermore, additional significant group differences emerged in cortical surface area when age and ICV were used as covariates

This thread has helped me realize I am in fact a ryogendered being

As opposed to a RYUgendered being?

No. Jacob was born with extreme autism and his identification with trans/xis/xir identities is just a new outlet for it

Again I don't identify as trans..

I find it funny how his last name is Blaustein and he just can't seem to stop getting kicked out of every community he enters.

Actually I can still post on those forums.

People are smart enough to know that when an asshole back pedals on an unpopular opinion it's not because their opinion has changed (99.9% of the time) it's because they want people to stop calling them an asshole for opinions they still hold but wish they'd never shared.

No one believes you because no one should.

By being "smart enough" you mean "just assume and pretend he is lying all the time"?

Once a dog fucking degenerate, forever a dog fucking degenerate.

None of the links they give show me fucking dogs. Or even imply I do or...tell me do you guys even look at the op, or just make things up as you go along

@ryu289 it appears you've left your poor linkedin profile derelict. I mean, a man as scholarly as you, it'd surely be preposterous that you're unemployed right now- you must be enacting a lot of change in this world with all those references you have collected, and just simply have been too busy saving trans lives to update your linkedin, right?

Yeah I forgot I had it.

I found some conservative blogger 'Didact' got annoyed by our friend here in the past, so he dedicated a whole blog post to eviscerating Jacob's comments on his site

Well it turns out the bastard would address any of my points here.

If anything, he banned me because he was a homophobic jackass who couldn't rebutt me, so ran away like a coward.
I am surprised you cheer someone who's a coward

he doesnt even read any of what he links to

Neither do you

Even with his pedophilia comments, he doesn't seem to be particularly concerned. As someone else previously stated, it seems he doesn't think anything wrong with it, more so that if he says the right thing people will think he is changed. I'm not sure if he just doesn't realize his comments and views are a massive red flag (due to whatever cognitive issue he has), or if he smugly thinks that since there is no hard proof of him engaging in any illegal activity with minors that he can chalk off any accusations as baseless and hateful toward him.

Considering none of you have hard proof and misunderstand my views, its more of the fact you can say I am a pedo all you want and it won't effect me.He's secretly transphobic and is seeking warped sperg validation by pretending a trans vag is no different than natural genitalia.
Just ignore that ciswomen can get fake vaginas too yet still be called women...

gay guys wouldn't fuck a necrotic inverted penis with colon among it

How is it "necrotic"?

Doesn't really help his case with the threads hes choosing to spam in

And of course you wouldn't link to what I said because it makes you look bad

Congratulations on living in his head rent free.

You mean congrats on running away and not addressing any of my points like a coward.

"People get changed in changing rooms and their genitals are out. This does not harm children. Therefore, there is no harm in me having my cock out around children regardless of whether it is in a changing room or not"

No that isn't it. I was talking about you guys complaing about Trans people in the changing room and people seeing their dicks. Not my fault if you can't read.

Does he just seek out pedophilia posts to respond to?

I was mocking someone's logic on the subject. VoxDay. You hear of him?

Known to harass people on deviantart:

How do I harass them when if anything you just show pics of the opposite.

This one speaks for itself about his belief in children and sex:

What does it say Syo? That there is such a thing as "too much info"? I am looking at both sides here.

Callouts by other Users on Reddit:

Look at the last one, that wasn't a callout, nor the one before that.

Is drugging someone bad?:

No I ask if the drug was dangeros

Minors and Sex:

Ever hear of Romeo and Juliet laws?
I suppose that context doesn't matter.

Minors

Where does it mention minors?
@GenociderSyo, I obviously live rent free in your mind.

Furry Sex?:

No.

Just, pure disgust. I actually said "ew" out loud. I had to wipe my screen from all the grease that post was covered in.

Do you prove the link is wrong in any way?

Banned from:

Got back on.

In response, my normal cows were sleeping today so I archived your shit same as I do the other cows I follow. It speaks for itself and context is pretty easy to see.

Ignoring the fact that you didn't address your errors as per usual?

SAS_Art $1/$10
Will Transform Anything Porn

It's not really porographic....

Not like that TG tag and expression he uses stands for.....oh wait: Transgender

Transgender is also a transformation theme.
I think you are confused.

He really seems to hates that I won't respond to that post still, but no reason to respond and give attention.

Cough, cough <coward>, cough cough

Ever heard of the quote "He Doth Protest Too Much" ?

You mean you?

Just can't....

I ususally fight against the idea of gay and pedophiles being the same hence why that crap comes up so much. Off course you guys talk about that stuff here as well so...

The link to support his case in the 3rd one is is of course to the spa incident where a REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER portaying himself as a woman showed his erect penis to children.

I already addressed your stupidity here:
View attachment 2547520

So Jacob, @ryu289 , how is your relationship with the law?

The charges were dropped so pretty good.

Oh my fucking god he's actually citing Prostasia as a source. That's like quoting NAMBLA. The good terves of Mumsnet have dug up a lot of stuff on them, good parents being the natural enemy of paedos after all.

Prostasia Foundation - Child protection or dismantling Safeguarding? | Mumsnet

Credit to Agilelass for flagging these people in the Dr Em Unicorns thread, I thought they warranted a thread of their own. prostasia.orgThey claim t

www.mumsnet.com

So per your link they think talking about setting boundries is the same as pedophilia? I don't think mumsnet is full of sane people...

His links are to that Protasia place that has been brought up as a M.A.P. organization.

Its amazing that a child protection group is considered peophilia.

Admitting you want to rape kids is free speech. Don't be a bigot.

Attraction to kids is not the same as wanting to have sex with them, let alone going through it.

What the fuck does this even mean? I'm genuinely struggling to figure it out. It reads like they're trying to take a moral high ground and claim other child protection organizations actually support pedophilia since they don't explicitly mention consent. It also reads like being sex-positive is when the child consents when they have sex with an adult.

They also say

No. Protecting children from sexual abuse is a vital function of government, and this includes the criminalization of sex between adults and children under any circumstances, and of the possession of child sexual abuse material (child pornography). But a common mistake is to make laws that are broader than necessary to achieve those aims, so that they harm others (or even children themselves), and may be unconstitutional. Another mistake is that laws are often not evidence-based, which means that they are ineffective.

This is also important

Our society’s current default response to child sexual abuse is based on the stereotype that most child sex offending is committed by known sex offenders and by those involved in an “industry” of child sex trafficking. But neither of those stereotypes is true:

• 95% of sexual offenses are committed by someone with no criminal history
• 90% of CSA is perpetrated by someone the child knows and trusts
• 77% of CSA is committed in a residence
• 73% of CSA is committed by those who are primarily attracted to adults
• 35% of CSA is committed by juveniles

Oh look, sources.
So much for child sex and consent...you guys don't read this huh?
Reducing self-stigmatization in MAPs can reduce risks of offending, but I guess you like children getting raped to justify your anger.

Since when do you need to actually molest kids before being a pedo? That's not how this works lmao. A gay incel is still gay, even if they don't have sex with other men

Is he outrigt claiming that child molesters are not pedos, and actual pedos don't molest kids? Da fuck. That's like saying it's mostly straight men having gay sex, and that most gays don't fuck other men

Everyone here confuses sexual attraction with sexual orientation

He was loved there too:

They were shocked at what I write but let me continue: https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=463097&sid=c31dd1ae0dcc38bccec95c4c261d1795#p463097

Yeah, make that double-fuck Zinnia, ryu, and the sex offender. How on earth was this an issue worth debating??

It was the fact you guys only had one woman's testimony and accepted it as truth.

He does not understand context - not the context of his own arguments (such as the fact that people can and do draw conclusions not just about what he says but about where, when and how often he says it, this really confuses him because he doesn't understand the concept of metatextual analysis),

Actually none of you seem to care about context:
View attachment 2552400

He doesn't understand that the nature of a source is just as important as what the source says when judging it,

Isn't that fallacious reasoning? Yeah you said:

So he imitates them - instead of nitpicking he just seizes on irrelevant things, he accuses people of using "logical fallacies" that don't make any sense in context and I sincerely doubt he has any real understanding of what most of them mean (let alone that if someone's logic may be flawed, that doesn't necessarily mean they are wrong)

But aren't you doing that by thinking the nature of the source matters more?
If one can prove the opponent's argument is false, and that they have an ulterior motive for making the false claim, their entire position is much weaker. But to argue robustly, you need to show the actual argument is wrong. Simply being indicated as having possible bias does not make one wrong....like you said but subsequently ignore.

Besides I know people like @Lemmimgwise and @Pentex never checked their sources: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/pedophilia-in-the-gay-community.86956/post-9982673

Lemmingwise in particular has some weird ideas about evidence: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/pedophilia-in-the-gay-community.86956/post-10004001

And off course instead of addressing it she runs away.
Pentax is no better:
View attachment 2552428

And off course @GenociderSyo can't read sources to save his life either: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/insane-parents-of-transgender-kids.30908/post-9956007

It's mostly because he thinks he's fighting one by saying it's perfectly normal for kids to twerk in drag, we say, "no, it isn't, retard," he somehow twists it into us being prudes who believe that the kid will become a tranny with AIDS within a few years or will get molested somewhere down the line.

Um, no see the pic above. Are you twisting my words?

Rather sure coffey is done with him now:

I am done with him. The guy is dishonest as fuck.

Ahhh yes, a thread about tabletop roleplaying games, perfect place to discuss slavery and the confederacy

Hey, I was responding to someone who was trying to act like making the confederacy not racist added "nuance"

(that's also a meme, profile comments don't show they've been edited)

The fact you needed to inform people of that just shows the low iq average here.

Also yes only biological women can give birth and even if the day come some deranged cross dressers get an implanted womb and by some miracle carry to term they still won’t be a woman.

So they do everything a "biological woman" does yet they won't be a woman in your eyes because? You contradict yourself.

Buh-buh-but I'm not a pedophile! I said that gay people aren't pedophiles, so there! I'm automatically immune!

Why does he keep falling back on this whenever people point out that he wants to fuck kids?

Becasuse you think me talking about it must mean I am one. That is even worse.

I agree with you and the couple others who think his bizarre behaviour trying to defend these things is a reflection of his guilt for something he has done or desires to do with children. What we are witnessing is the mental gymnastics of him attempting to convince himself he is a good person while also lusting for something he knows deep down is wrong.

Because only a pedophile would talk about this?
Seriously guys.

When he talks about CSA being committed by "juveniles", he's deliberately obfuscating the fact that it's older children and teenagers molesting little kids. It's not like a couple of 16-year-olds with a crush on each other having awkward sexual experimentation together, it's more like the James Bulger case where two 10-year-olds molested and killed a 2-year-old - and since then,

Reducing self-stigmatization in MAPs can reduce risks of offending

73% of CSA is committed by those who are primarily attracted to adults, not pedophiles.

35% of CSA is committed by juveniles, which certainly doesn't fit the definition of pedophilia.
And before you argue the definition of 'juvenile"

Known juvenile offenders who commit sex offenses against minors span a variety of ages. Five percent are younger than 9 years, and 16 percent are younger than 12 years (figure 1). The rate rises sharply around age 12 and plateaus after age 14. As a proportion of the total, 38 percent are between ages 12 and 14, and 46 percent are between ages 15 and 17.

Seven out of eight juvenile offenders are at least 12 years old, and 93% are boys. (Crimes Against Children Research Center, UNH, 2010)

Everyone thinks being a child molester is the same as being an adult who has an attraction to children.

I agree there's some shred of truth to the idea that some child molesters get off on the power thing or the sadism aspect, but saying not all pedophiles touch kids is clearly defending them, even if it's true.

Consuming CP, even if they don't produce it, still creates a market for it. Knowing full well you shouldn't be around kids, but still doing so, makes you a threat. Not seeking help when you know you need it, makes you a danger.

The only pedophiles who get a bit of decency, would be the ones seeking psychological help and are okay with never being around kids. The ones who don't seek help, consume CP or try to normalize it or trying to be around kids - deserve nothing but a bullet

Do you think I support CP? Why?

And were it anyone else I'd give them the benefit of the doubt, but Jacob can fuck right off with "I don't defend pedophiles anymore" when he clearly still does with his "akichually pedos don't harm kids and it's the non-pedos who molest kids!"

I mean, he's literally defending prostasia at this point

Who are against child porn fyi.

I am just going to throw this out there, take it with a pinch of salt because I have no formal education in the field of psychology.

Obviously...

Jacob is demonstrating a couple of odd behavior that we all find unnerving, consciously and sub-consciously. On the conscious level it is because of the clearly wretched and disturbing topic. On the other level....

He is displaying behaviors of guilt. What he is doing through his bizarre arguments on the subject is justifcation of a situation, topic, or action. May it be "accidental nudity" in front of children. Or how you are completely not a pedo just cause you molest a kid.

"We find it disturbing, so he should too!"

This has always been one of the craziest things to me, how far and fast the transition was for the ~2010 liberal to 180 on pretty much everything they believed previously. Been a fascinating ride watching how power (not even really power, more like only the perception of power or perception of being morally correct) can change up somebody's beliefs.

So it was mainly older men which makes this study not very generalizable:

Look here:

Initially, there was significant concern that naturism either reflected or resulted in negative psychological effects (Negy 2004), particularly for children (Okami 1995; Smith and Sparks 1986). However, the empirical research on naturism and public nudity failed to support these assumptions. Oleinick et al. (1966) found no relationship between exposure to nudity in childhood and later psychiatric symptomology. Lewis and Janda (1988) found a positive association between exposure to nudity early in life and willingness to engage in casual sex, but no associations with any other measure of sexual or emotional adjustment. In an 18-year longitudinal study Okami et al. (1998) found no effects of exposure to parental nudity on sexual activity during adolescence, teenage pregnancy, contracting sexually transmitted diseases, or antisocial behaviour such as shoplifting. Indeed, exposure to parental nudity was associated with less usage of recreational drugs and higher levels of self-acceptance. Given the apparent lack of negative effects, it was perhaps unsurprising that the potential positive effects of naturism began to be considered.

When I did just that he got so mad he @ me on other peoples profiles and in other threads it upset him so much.

Becasue you misread the studies yourself. Why do you pretend to be correct?

Jacob shouts "prove it" and then will actively try to use this information against you if you don't link at least five studies that he supports that are supportive of your argument.

I ask for evidence and when I point out how theirs are wrong they go DARVO on me

In light of the fact we've reached the top of search results about @ryu289, do we have any idea what the S in Jacob S. Blaustein stands for? And if so, I think that @Syntaxion should consider adding it to the title of the thread, for completeness's sake

You haven't reached the top...

In this case, it's a fine of around $35, but the extra fees is from an "unsafe drivers fund," going by the paperwork. Looks like he chickened out and plead guilty...Annnnd it turns out to be an "gotcha!" scheme because it's an expensive way to avoid getting points on your license.

Never get a moving violation in America, folks. They usually eat up most of your weekly paycheck.

Figures...I was going through the after effects of a nervous breakdown (college exams man) and well...

So Ryu bought TG Fetish of an 8 year old character. He does not deny this and attempts to lie that it is not TG when the bid post clearly states it is.

Try again moron

Wait let me get this straight... Jacob is into transformation porn with 8 or 9 year old characters that are regressing in age?

No. Did you even see the kink?

I have no words. Only emotions and they can be expressed only one way. This:

Becasue as we all know fictional characters are the same as wanting to fuck real life children...

Oh, Christ. That explains why he was defending no-contact pedophiles on Reddit: he himself is one, blatantly admitted by his own tongue. He was indeed encouraging the separation of kiddie fetishes and pedophilia because he feels guilty for his actions. This thread keeps getting better and better!

Do any of you understand how transformation fetishes work?

Not gonna lie, if there was a thread about me I'd watched talked in that one pretty regularly.

The voices in his head I guess. The ones telling him that molesting kids and animals is okay.

I should point out wereknight and others respond to me

Also. I'd like to ask a question. Not to fellow Kiwis but those retards and twitter fags that surely read this thread as well.
You saw his credentials and actual adress where does that fucker live. Why NOBODY of you thought of paying jacob a visit. With 12 gauge?
I'm not insist on that and don't propagate murder. But in case of pedophiles like this one that's a necessity. We don't pozload my neghole. That's your privilege, twitter soyjaks.

Well they don't want the cops duh. Also thanks for making yourself legally liable

He tried to fight with a sexology site and lost:

That's because I showed him this.

And he defines conversion therapy as only being about sexual orientation. Why should anybody trust that moron

Then RESPONDED to the thread on reddit

I forgot to put in text mode, so I added what else I wanted to say in a comment

Why is it wrong to be attracted to children? Why? It just...is.

Wow, how convincing. Yeah, don't give logic, just declare a person to be a thought-criminal.

He's also still uppity about the Byuu thing and doesn't know how to disprove anything himself, so he's asking his Reddit personal army to do it for him. Here's a tip, Jacob: if you can't disprove something, there's quite a chance that it's actually true.

Ask yourself this. The video looks at a list of US citizens who died abroad without considering if Byuu was a naturalized citizen since they lived in Japan for years. If so, they looked at the wrong criteria. Also, where is Byuu if they did fake their death?

I feel genuine repulse. I am vomit.

Answer me. If attraction to a

The subject was "Feds charge transgender activist with raping 4-year old on video"
This was the only comment he left.

Do you believe you are not a pedo or MAP cause you are not a christian? Isn't this awfully discriminatory of you considering 50% of the world is christian?

No, it's the fact that Robert Stacy Mccain has a habit of acting like being gay or trans means you are automatically a pedo. Since statistically you are more likley to be molested by a pastor, I wonder why he doesn't apply his logic to all the child molestation and rape in the churches. I am turning his logic against him

Oh, also adults only wanting to fuck other adults is literally normal. It is the norm among humans to not want to fuck kids. Fucking kids is considered a paraphilia for multiple reasons. It's not normal, it's dangerous, and it harms people.

No that is attacking people for thoughts. How Orwellian of you. Define norm, please.

As a Catholic, I'm deeply insulted by his comment.

So? It's true.

"Oh it is only ficitonal characters. Please disregard all my previous statements, hankering for transformation art of young characters. Did I mention that it is a fetish? Oh well! Oh, and I may have said 6 years ago I believe adolescent can consent to sex with and adult but that is entirely out of context!!

Again, do you know the difference between real life and fiction?

I just fap to true and honest fictional monster-girls. Or as you know them. Trannies. "

I don't call them that. Did I ever call them transwomen?

This is a major tell right here. Cilleystring says an "attraction to children" is predatory. (normal people understand this because they understand an attraction to any predatory behavior even if not acted on is still a predatory urge)

Jacob's response is to reframe "attraction to children" as "looking at depictions of women" to lessen the impact of it being about innocent children who can't have agency. I don't know what the psychological term for this is (transference?) but he's also consciously and/or subconsciously equating adult women with children in the context of sexual attraction particularly (and tellingly) as objects to be viewed for sexual purposes in this context.

One could reasonably infer from this and previous statements by Jacob that he sees the children he lusts for as capable of adult level consent on some level out of delusion or more likely to assuage his guilty conscience or justify his actions.

Wait, you say that an attraction to children is inherently predatory? That's tatatulolgy, not an explanation. You are simply saying "it just is shut up"
Also I said "looking at fictional depections of women". Why do you ignore the word fictional in this context?
Likewise why do you assume that a) I have an attraction to real life children, and b) that means I automatically think they are capable of adult consent?

You are making a lot of leaps in logic here.

View attachment 2590469

You are obsessed with me Syo. Didn't know you got off on people you consider child molesters

 

[Sprate Header]

WHAT
THE
FUCK!?

 

[Spunt]

Lol I'm not reading all that you paedophile.

 

[Doppio Vinegar]

He's here! He's here! Oh, joyous day!

Anyways, you're absolutely insane if you think I'm going to be reading any of that. There aren't enough sources linked for my liking.

 

[IKOL]

Hyperborea and the Fourth Reich,

Wait, the Fourth Reich is a thing now? How the fuck have I missed that up?

also JESUS. FUCKING. CHRIST.
WHAT. THE. FUCKING. WALL. OF. PEDO. SPERGING. OH. MY. SATAN.

He's here! He's here! Oh, joyous day!

PRAISE WILLY WONKA~... Wait, that was reserved for another occasion. My bad.

 

[Sprate Header]

Do we currently have a record for longest post on the site? Because I think @ryu289 wants to be a contender @Null

 

[GenociderSyo]

Archived:

Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289 | Page 27 | Kiwi Farms

archived 2 Oct 2021 20:42:35 UTC

archive.md

And as I said before I archive that is what I do. You became a lolcow and thus you are archived. It's not an obession it is what we DO on this website.

 

[ryu289]

He's here! He's here! Oh, joyous day!

Anyways, you're absolutely insane if you think I'm going to be reading any of that. There aren't enough sources linked for my liking.

You mean the part where you lied about prostasia?

And as I said before I archive that is what I do. You became a lolcow and thus you are archived. It's not an obession it is what we DO on this website.

Yes, that is an obsession.