Do you think the Jurassic Park one was better than the Indiana Jones one? Because the JP was unbelievably shit attempts at comedy, IJ was attempts to discuss the films as popular cinema that did a bad job. Should they all be joke videos if they are blockbusters? Alien was a huge success, should be just make memes about that because trying is for nerds? JFC
Nobody would say this stuff should be analysed like Tarkovsky, but something better than shit would be great. Things can also be funny and informative at the same time, but it needs more core knowledge or work to do that. If RR isn't trying to be interesting like re:View that is fine, but at its worst it's not funny either.
Edit: pretty much the only value the JP video had for me was not even about the subject (2 vs. 3), but James showing some interest in the practical effects of the first. I don't even mind it being in there as off-topic, but it shows up the non-content of the rest of it.