Horrorcow Lucas Werner - A man of Spokane, Washington who is obsessed with millennial and Gen Z chicks

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
i have to disagree in part. It very much depends on the hospital, the ward, the patients, milieu, shift, and the staff.

Psych hospitals where I’ve been employed have varied a lot. A state-run facility had a syphilis outbreak on one ward and a sexual assault of an autistic patient on another ward. The forensic units do tend to be better equipped but voluntary or involuntary psych units without criminal involvement can really vary. Most of the assaults in general occurred nights and weekends where there is minimal staffing.

I would say it might be harder for patients to sneak off for sexual encounters depending on the ward, but the time it takes for a patient to corner or attack another is split-second. And lucas is pretty opportunistic. One place where I worked had an incident of near escape because one patient used the chaos of another patient trying to choke out a nurse to slip through the ward door out to the hallway. My first day on an adolescent psych unit involved having a severely autistic patient walk by me and slip her arm around mine to try to bite me. I’d worked in other psych units before so I slipped through quick but I recall how quick she had been.

as others mentioned, substance abuse rehabs have a reputation for hooking up and that’s something that’s pretty strongly admonished and monitored. I only had a few mini stints covering mental health cases at dual diagnosis rehabs but they seemed to be much better about discharging patients who begin forming exclusive relationships (courting/grooming). Inpatient psych units don’t have that luxury

Edit to add: I’ve never been employed or even stepped foot into the hospitals Lucas has been in or might be in, so if you’re speaking of his specific psych unit, then you may be right. It may be very secure and well-staffed. I’m commenting on psych units in general where I’ve worked in 3 states, but not Washington.
Violence is more of an issue for psych wards, prohibited fucking more a problem for rehabs. Lucas is little threat to either fight or fuck, but he's in an environment where people suspect that you're going to if they turn their backs. It must be flattering for him to be treated as an adult male.
You could pick up women in rehab. That happens too. This is a really bad idea because if one relapses the other usually does too.
Yeah, rehab babies are a thing, too. Like psych wards, rehabs gather emotionally charged, vulnerable people in crisis under one roof, and provide them with opportunities to mingle. Fucking inevitably follows. This is true not just of rehabs, but 12 step and "recovery communities" in general. You may have heard of the fabled "13th step." This is fucking. Many people participate in "recovery" for the express purpose of locating and fucking, someone vulnerable.

Rehab couples do not last and do not stay sober. You are correct in that when one horny addict relapses, the other typically does, too. When they break up, as they inevitably will, one or both will relapse. Any difficulty in the relationship=relapse. But this isn't extraordinary, because addicts need no nudging to relapse.

Lucas hasn't publicly tried this approach or identified rehabs and meetings as a stalking ground for teen puss puss. I don't think he will. To do so, he'd have to admit that he has a problem, or at least go through the motions of admitting that he has a problem. And the kind of puss puss one finds in rehabs and rooms generally isn't the illegally young, top shelf, envy-inducing variety that Lucas is eager to be seen with. Finally, Lucas lacks the social skills necessary to compete against other rehab Romeos. The presence of a single male in the community with a baseball cap and neck tattoo would strike Lucas mute.
 
Violence is more of an issue for psych wards, prohibited fucking more a problem for rehabs. Lucas is little threat to either fight or fuck, but he's in an environment where people suspect that you're going to if they turn their backs. It must be flattering for him to be treated as an adult male.

Yeah, rehab babies are a thing, too. Like psych wards, rehabs gather emotionally charged, vulnerable people in crisis under one roof, and provide them with opportunities to mingle. Fucking inevitably follows. This is true not just of rehabs, but 12 step and "recovery communities" in general. You may have heard of the fabled "13th step." This is fucking. Many people participate in "recovery" for the express purpose of locating and fucking, someone vulnerable.

Rehab couples do not last and do not stay sober. You are correct in that when one horny addict relapses, the other typically does, too. When they break up, as they inevitably will, one or both will relapse. Any difficulty in the relationship=relapse. But this isn't extraordinary, because addicts need no nudging to relapse.

Lucas hasn't publicly tried this approach or identified rehabs and meetings as a stalking ground for teen puss puss. I don't think he will. To do so, he'd have to admit that he has a problem, or at least go through the motions of admitting that he has a problem. And the kind of puss puss one finds in rehabs and rooms generally isn't the illegally young, top shelf, envy-inducing variety that Lucas is eager to be seen with. Finally, Lucas lacks the social skills necessary to compete against other rehab Romeos. The presence of a single male in the community with a baseball cap and neck tattoo would strike Lucas mute.
Lucas couldn’t handle the 12 Steps.

Lucas cannot admit in any higher power
Lucas would never be able to admit he has a problem, that he has no control, that his efforts have been ineffective. He could not in any way make an unflinching moral inventory of his faults or share them with others.

beyond just him not thinking he needs therapy, I think he’d just completely hate any part of the 12 step model. I’m not necessarily an advocate or expert, but I know enough to know that Lucas would be completely triggered beyond his typical “You’re the problem, not me” response.

but it would be funny to watch.
 
Lucas couldn’t handle the 12 Steps.

Lucas cannot admit in any higher power
Lucas would never be able to admit he has a problem, that he has no control, that his efforts have been ineffective. He could not in any way make an unflinching moral inventory of his faults or share them with others.

beyond just him not thinking he needs therapy, I think he’d just completely hate any part of the 12 step model. I’m not necessarily an advocate or expert, but I know enough to know that Lucas would be completely triggered beyond his typical “You’re the problem, not me” response.

but it would be funny to watch.
"Lucas, the first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem"
"No! I'm plenty good! I've just been cock-blocked by Gen-Z flatbill Christian drug dealers with credit cards!"
"Lucas, blaming others does not help you overcome your problems."
"All I need is a smart pretty girlfriend under the age of 22 to anally fist and impregnate! Then the other problems will disappear!"
"Lucas, perhaps its time to admit that it's just not in the cards for you."
*Lucas tard-rage meltdown ensues*
 
Remember that time Lucas called himself a cow while cold-calling some poor woman in October 2020?

I do. :)

View attachment 2359475
For once he exhibits an unintentional level of self awareness, I’m dying of laughter, he’s the calf I’m the cow, I’m the adult in this situation lol.

Edit: and shit he is a closet pedophile I guess we all knew that but he is admitting here with a total lack of understanding why saying that is socially unacceptable. That was back in 2013 when he was 34? Now he knows that’s not a good thing to admit but wow like still at 34 thinking that’s just ok to say on the internet. And he isn’t exactly closeted he’s just saying he’s shamed for it and trying to hide it which he’s not.
 
Last edited:
I just noticed that val kilmer is starting to look eerily like lucas at times. Take this for example:

kingwern.jpg


I can totally see king lucas, heir to king roy, looking exactly like that - sunglasses included, during his reign over the elk kingdom. Not that he'll ever get to rule over it, nor will he likely live longer than his parents at the rate he's going
 
I just noticed that val kilmer is starting to look eerily like lucas at times. Take this for example:

View attachment 2360125

I can totally see king lucas, heir to king roy, looking exactly like that - sunglasses included, during his reign over the elk kingdom. Not that he'll ever get to rule over it, nor will he likely live longer than his parents at the rate he's going
I see Tommy Wiseau more than Lucas here.

WTF is this? I need to watch Tombstone again to cleanse this picture from my memory.
 
I see Tommy Wiseau more than Lucas here.

WTF is this? I need to watch Tombstone again to cleanse this picture from my memory.
Its in his wikipedia page. Says its him 'reigning as bacchus at a 2009 mardi gras parade in new orleans'

I don't know though, it looks like a sort of healthier wern to me and could certainly get an interesting photoshop to that effect
 
I wonder how this trip to the psych ward will factor in to whatever court stuff he's wrapped up in supposedly keeping him from posting on social media? Some people were saying he's "grounded" until late August but I don't know if this could extend that or what considering he probably has to at least stay in contact with the courts to some degree and so they're going to know he's caused a scene again and not ready to be off the hook yet.
 
I wonder how this trip to the psych ward will factor in to whatever court stuff he's wrapped up in supposedly keeping him from posting on social media? Some people were saying he's "grounded" until late August but I don't know if this could extend that or what considering he probably has to at least stay in contact with the courts to some degree and so they're going to know he's caused a scene again and not ready to be off the hook yet.

doubtful. He is on a legal agreement for charge diversion. That would involve some basic requirements for behavior, including no further legal charges, not missing court, etc.

Unless he was charged or is charged for whatever incident happened (no evidence of that so far), there is no legal grounds based on that to extend the diversion requirements.

but, if he hasn’t been doing what he was supposed to, like sobriety or going to mh appts, and the outburst gives evidence to indicate he has been using substances or shows that he’s avoiding some required part of his agreement, that could result in either him being out of compliance and thus off diversion or getting some sort of violation of conditions.

it’s hard to know for sure without knowing specifically what he has been told to do.
 
I wonder if that fat faggot, Lucas Werner, I wonder if he is still in the puzzle factory or if they have spit him back onto the streets to continue grazing the streets and making his attraction signs? He is the cow!

He was screaming like a loon in that video. If he is in there too long, SSI will put his tugboat in the ship yard until he gets released.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if that fat faggot, Lucas Werner, I wonder if he is still in the puzzle factory or they have spit him back onto the streets to continue grazing the streets and making his attraction signs? He is the cow!

He was screaming like a loon in that video. If he is in there too long, SSI will put his tugboat in the ship yard until he gets released.
Here's the rules on institutionalized persons:

"Section 1611(e)(1)(G) of the Social Security Act provides that Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients, who are temporarily institutionalized for medical care (and who would otherwise receive a reduced benefit or none at all), can get benefits during the first 3 full months of institutionalization to pay expenses to maintain their home or living arrangement where they may return upon discharge. We refer to benefits paid under section 1611(e)(1)(G) as temporary institutionalization (TI) benefits."

I'm not sure if being a screaming bum wandering around at random counts as a "living arrangement." But if it does he'd be entitled to it for 90 days.
 
Let's just go back in time to page 1 of this thread to be reminded that this is a thing Lucas thought about and went with, "Hell yeah, that's hot" and sent it to someone he thought was a young woman.

1626785860847.png


The implication here is that, if presented with a bowl of ice cream, he'd just shove his face into it.

This is Lucas flirting, being smooth, being The Best Guy.
 
Let's just go back in time to page 1 of this thread to be reminded that this is a thing Lucas thought about and went with, "Hell yeah, that's hot" and sent it to someone he thought was a young woman.

View attachment 2363901

The implication here is that, if presented with a bowl of ice cream, he'd just shove his face into it.

This is Lucas flirting, being smooth, being The Best Guy.
704AC1F8-5297-4D19-BC63-5A05EBD907C2.jpeg

I need clits all over my dick. I say interesting and poignant things.

A real word smith.

Edit: what a great channel description straight to the point with all of his pathologies
 
Last edited:
Here's the rules on institutionalized persons:

"Section 1611(e)(1)(G) of the Social Security Act provides that Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients, who are temporarily institutionalized for medical care (and who would otherwise receive a reduced benefit or none at all), can get benefits during the first 3 full months of institutionalization to pay expenses to maintain their home or living arrangement where they may return upon discharge. We refer to benefits paid under section 1611(e)(1)(G) as temporary institutionalization (TI) benefits."

I'm not sure if being a screaming bum wandering around at random counts as a "living arrangement." But if it does he'd be entitled to it for 90 days.
Knowing the Werns luck leeching off the tax payer, he'll be locked up 89 days and walk out of the loony bin to 3 months of tax payer funder retard bucks that goes right to Clinkerniggers and other medium food places then begging saga in under a week.
 
Knowing the Werns luck leeching off the tax payer, he'll be locked up 89 days and walk out of the loony bin to 3 months of tax payer funder retard bucks that goes right to Clinkerniggers and other medium food places then begging saga in under a week.
This is a more plain English description of the rule.

Generally, if you are in an institution, like a mental institution, you'd only be entitled to $30 a month.


WHAT INFORMATION DO I NEED TO PROVIDE?​

We need you or someone close to you (i.e., Representative Payee, family member, or friend) knowledgeable about your circumstances to report to SSA via telephone or in-person that:
  • you entered a medical facility and will be there for 90 consecutive days or less, and
  • while you are in the facility you need your SSI benefits to maintain your home or living arrangement where you may return upon discharge.

It seems to imply you need something to maintain to qualify for this. Also you have to know this rule exists and submit paperwork in a timely manner. I'm sure a lot of people so nuts they're in a loony bin can manage to figure this out when I barely can and am not even sure if I'm right.

But I think being homeless doesn't qualify as a "home or living arrangement," since he's not going to lose it while he's in the laughing academy. He'll still be homeless when he leaves.

So I think he'd qualify for the $30 a month.

If he does qualify, it's not by having a "home," since he doesn't. It's if whatever he's doing qualifies as a "living arrangement."
 
Back