The go-to line of people angry at this just lie about what I've said. I did not say you need a literal contract. There is no false conflation of violent sexual assault and sexually predatory behavior, you are the one saying that. By the way: an identical point is made by lolicons, who say that calling lolicon 'drawn child pornography' harms the victims of real child pornography, though nobody actually conflates the two except the person making that argument.
I'll remind you that what this person did is: (1) invite an 18-year-old he's never met before into his hotel room, (2) showed her a video of a My Little Pony review, (3) immediately shoved her back onto the bed and had sex with her, (4) shook her hand and said "friends?" after the fact.
I genuinely believe this is predatory behavior. He took a woman younger than him who trusted him, brought her into a private space to treat her with gifts, brought her guard down with those gifts, suddenly proceeded to sex without any caution or foreplay or discussion, then immediately tried to distance himself from her.
To fault her for this, you would have to first accept that any woman walking into any hotel room of their own volition is consenting to spontaneous sex with whoever is there, or you would have to insist that for it to be nonconsensual that she must fight back in some way - which, if compared to any other offense, is nonsense. It's not theft if you don't explicitly say "please don't take my stuff" or violently assault the thief stealing your belongings.
For the second time, perhaps the instinct of a 20-year-old man is that it's her fault because she knows how he is, or that her meeting him again would retroactively make the first time consensual. However, as a man in his thirties, I know people well enough to say that this is poor decision making as a result of trauma from the first incident. What she wanted was to have a relationship with someone she had an online friendship/admiration for. When he took advantage of her and then immediately brushed her off, this causes an injury. Meeting with him a second time was her way of trying to regain control of her bodily autonomy. If she managed to loop him into a relationship then, it would retroactively make the first incident acceptable and she could get over it easier.
However, after the second incident, she could no longer cope with what had happened and she wrote a call-out post. This is again a way of trying to regain control of your life after being ejaculated on by a sperg in two separate bouts of spontaneous nonconsensual sex (there's another word for that).
Let's say that the person is autistic and doesn't understand that you can't re-enact your hentai porn in real life because real women don't like being subjected to spontaneous sex with strangers. What could Autsmo McClop done to avoid being credibly accused of rape? Let's see.
1. Asked "Do you want to have sex?"
2. Attempted foreplay.
If you say that 1 is unreasonable, you are a retard. If you are having casual sex with strangers you do not know, you should not rely entirely on body language, because this person is a stranger you do not know and you do not know their body language. Think of it like a dog. There's a strange dog. Do you pet it? Do you try to fuck it? No, because that's a strange dog and you don't know how it reacts to you yet. It might bite your cock off.
And there is nothing, absolutely nothing more awkward about asking "do you want to have sex?" in this situation in particular, considering this is a heavily autistic brony who just showed the woman he's trying to have sex with a My Little Pony review. Being able to demonstrate understanding of basic human concepts like consent might actually help him look less retarded and more attractive. Trying to say that asking "do you want to have sex?" is somehow a fucking mood killer when the proceeding 15 minutes to that question was a YouTube review of a fucking children's cartoon is the most absurd shit ever.
Second, you should basically always attempt foreplay. I don't think there's any sexual encounter that does not benefit from foreplay. Even spontaneous sex with a familiar person benefits from foreplay. It would have benefited Autismo McClop a lot to slowly heat up the encounter, and it would have allowed the woman more opportunity to more easily say she doesn't want to continue.
Lets say that she's a dumb, evil woman and goes along with 15 minutes of foreplay into sex with a brony. That would actually hurt her credibility a lot. If someone's leaning into a kiss and you go along with it for however long as it progresses to sex, that is implied consent and it's her fault if she suddenly regrets it. I would not blame the brony if he had brought the woman to his hotel room, he leaned in for a kiss, and then was rejected. I think even if the kiss landed and then she left and wrote a callout post, there's very little harm done and I could understand him thinking she would have romantic interests in him. But that's not what happened. There was no cuddling, no kissing, no intimacy of any kind. He physically shoved a woman half his size onto a bed and undressed her to have sex.
Do you know what the complete absense of verbal consent and foreplay indicates to me? Autismo McClop did not care if she consented, and he did not care if she enjoyed the sex. What does that sound like to you?
Hey, wanna have sex?
