Very Professional
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2025
I disagree somewhat, but otherwise agree with you here, particularly that Commander suffers the most by being the de facto main format.I would argue the fixation on archetypes has more to do with eliminating block structure than with any given popularity in UB or Commander, and the obvious-templating which has been used between sets (obvious to limited players) has created grossly redundant archetypes.
People who say this are just scrubs getting filtered by the Arena ladder. Depending on the Standard environment you can still ball on a budget pretty easily. Boros Dragons (~$130 iirc) just took 2nd place in a Standard Challenge and if you settle for an only slightly shittier landbase you can shave close to $100 off of that, the threats are all incredibly cheap. Before the last rotation MonoB was so pushed you could make a very annoying Discard/Demons list for <$50. I'm pretty sure there are a few MonoG Stompy lists that are very afforable too. While these aren't going to make you a world champion, a half-decent player could take an FNM with them.I also find that most of the kvetching about modern design extends from people whining that their $50 pile can't compete against $300 decks, 'like back in the old days,' despite the fact that cards like Shivan Dragon or Pack Rat used to be $20. So to say, I think the complaining is drawn from people who've never won an FNM, much less anything bigger, and wizards doesn't really give a shit if the piggies keep ponying up to play mono-red in arena Bo1.
