Late, took a break from the farms for a bit.
I don't know if they still do this on an official basis, but it used to be a custom some places to gladly buy someone a bus ticket anywhere else. One way.
Yup, they'll send them anywhere they want as long as it's sufficiently far away, and if they don't specify, they send them to some accepting place they're less likely to leave, like San Francisco or Portland.
Generally when someone is released from prison after a long stay, they get anywhere from $20 to $200 depending on the state. This is called gate money. Virginia sort of has a generous gate money policy. They take 10% of all money sent to the inmate and try to create a savings account with $1,000 to be given to the inmate upon release. They also take 10% of the prisoner's wages from doing prison labor to put into the account. This is called Forced Savings.
I don't know for sure, but this probably doesn't apply to people awaiting trial.
We need Pointless Sperg to clear this up but I think the story goes:
Thanks, but I'm just a retard in a completely different jurisdiction with related experience, again don't take what I say as gospel -- I just know how to do research since I've done it elsewhere.
- The tugboat keeps on tugging because Chris is still technically presumed innocent. Once his bank account hits around $3000 the tugboat is paused, so Chris will have a nice little nest egg. Not to mention 10% of weenbux from commissary etc
SSDI does not have any sort of asset limitations. You could have a billion dollars in the bank, own five yachts, and still receive it. The resource limitation only applies to SSI. The information provided in the past has said that Chris was receiving SSDI, not SSI. Now, this could be wrong, but SSDI would make sense, since the time frame that Bob signed up Chris for it was during the window where he could be put on lifetime SSDI as an adult for a documented condition from childhood.
- Class A misdemeanors don't require SOR registration so Chris can go visit Barb after he says "Sorry your honor" in July
It's a Class 5 felony, capable of being prosecuted as a Class 1 misdemeanor. There are no "Class A" misdemeanors in Virginia.
The sex offender registry requirements in Virginia do not have a general distinction between felonies and misdemeanors, or the class thereof. Qualification for mandatory registration is based on a list of statutes violated, how many times they are violated, and in what circumstances.
For incest, for the violation of the Persons Forbidden to Marry statute (which Chris is charged under), it does not differentiate between a felony or misdemeanor conviction. This includes violations of the statute that cannot be charged as a felony (for instance, sex with your adult niece/nephew).
The criteria in this case is that no registration is required if Chris is convicted, regardless of if it's a felony or not.
Instead, Chris will have to register if Barb is ruled incapacitated as part of the conviction. This applies even if he's only convicted of a misdemeanor.
- Barb isn't living with Cole, she's living with her sister and the man that even Chris admits they fought over, sexually.
We don't know Barb's location with any certainty, at least last I checked. We just know that Tom and Harriet were assisting her after the accident.
Nick Bate said his little sister came onto him too.
I'd almost believe it considering how fucking inbred that family looks, but that's another cow.
It hasn't been called Moldavia in ages, also who gives a shit where Moldova is other than people trying to score a cheap white girl from Eastern Europe?
It's still called Moldavia by the Transnistrian government, as well as other USSR irredentists. You hear it called that all the time on Russian TV these days. It constantly blows me away at how they swear they're not Communist but they wave the hammer and sickle.
It reminds me when
Chris tried to get unbanned from the Game Place store and he assumed because
he was upset about it Snyder would unban him if he apologised and explained how he felt since Chris’s thoughts and emotions are all that matter.
Chris does understand that other people have thoughts and emotions, the problem is that he can only understand the world from how he thinks. To a normal person it would be like knowing that fire is hot and someone else swearing it's cold. Your only rational interpretation would be that the other person is badly misinformed or outright insane or malicious.
To Chris, *everything* is like that. If he sees something a certain way, it's the True and Honest way the world is, and anyone who sees things differently is wrong. He's not really alone in this aspect -- you see that line of thinking from SJWs a lot -- Chris is just an extreme example.
If Chris thinks a certain food tastes bad, someone else who likes the food is just wrong. It's like if the people who rail against pineapple on pizza actually took it seriously instead of as a meme. If Chris accepts a difference of opinion, he's just humoring the other person because it's not something that's particularly important to him.
That's why he gets so upset about something as inconsequential as Sonic's arm color. It's important to him, so there is something wrong or malicious with people who like the blue arms.
Not really. If he acts crazy in court too much then either he is just going to get a more harsh sentence from pissing off the judge and everyone involved, or worse case he gets insanity. Either option really isn't good, as being sentenced to stay in a mental ward is just as bad if not worse then a normal sentence as they will keep you drugged up the whole time and you have to deal with the mentally insane.
Acting insane in court is not an insanity defense. How insane you are *now* is in no way proof that you were insane when you committed the crime. Chris could chop off his arms, legs and duck now and he couldn't use it as proof that he was too crippled to rape his mom, he'd have to prove that he had no arms, legs and duck at the time of the crime.
The only thing his current mental state affects is if he can be tried for his crimes at all, in which case he would never receive a verdict of any kind and the trial would just be shelved.
We have enough independent evidence from Chris himself that he at least percieved a cognitive decline. Remember he claimed his magic milk injections were helping cure Barb's memory problems. He bought himself an instruction manual for how to fuck the mentally handicapped. He believed she was suffering a mental decline. Which all by itself elevates things to rape.
Cognitive decline does not make it rape. Having a bad memory, or having poor decision-making abilities does not count as incapacitation. For it to be rape, Barb would have to be so incapacitated that she did not know what was happening, and/or so incapacitated that she could not communicate a lack of consent. Otherwise every time a stupid or forgetful person fucked it would be rape.
In Virginia, like in most places, in the absence of intentional intimidation or physical force, not refusing consent is considered de facto consent. Refusing consent at a different time also does not count as refusing consent at a later time. Otherwise, getting rebuffed by a girl on a first date but then scoring on the third date would be rape.
Diminished Capacity
And that would honestly be a Good End for Chris because it means the state is obligated to take some responsibility for him. Things do not tend to go well for Chris (or anyone else) when he's left to his own devices.
This. Chris is very, very lucky that DimCap due to autism was restored in Virginia shortly before the crime.
They'll just send him back to the hospital. Note: there's a limit to how long the court can hold him in jail under these charges. There's no such limit to how long the court can keep him hospitalized; only a limit to the court's patience.
There's no overall limit, but the requirements get steeper the longer he's hospitalized. Eventually the requirements become the same as civil commitment (either the level of that of someone not charged with a crime, or if he's charged with a sexually violent offense, the civil commitment requirements are the same as if he had been convicted of the offense and completed his sentence).
For simple incompetence, there is a limit. Depending on how you interpret it, it could either be one year from his arrest, or five years from his arrest.
However this is probably moot since they let him out of the hospital. I don't think they believe he's going back.