- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

IANAL but that sounds like a retarded reason for a lawsuitI'm pretty sure it can't criminally but could a Company get in trouble in a civil trial if they refused to implement a feature into a product one of their own engineers (the same one who designed the feature) called dangerous? Or can they get out of it through PLCAA or just saying "we're not obligated to buy a patent from anyone who says it makes out gun better just because"
What I mean is, say a P320 allegedly goes off in a Cop's Safariland and the bullet shatters his femur, could said cop's lawyer not bring up said factoid during the course of a civil trial to "prove" Sig's negligence in relation to his client's injury?IANAL but that sounds like a retarded reason for a lawsuit
I'd say possibly. This is an area of law that is very difficult to predict because it's often so political.I'm pretty sure it can't criminally but could a Company get in trouble in a civil trial if they refused to implement a feature into a product one of their own engineers (the same one who designed the feature) called dangerous? Or can they get out of it through PLCAA or just saying "we're not obligated to buy a patent from anyone who says it makes out gun better just because"
When a defective product causes injury, that's usually actionable.What I mean is, say a P320 allegedly goes off in a Cop's Safariland and the bullet shatters his femur, could said cop's lawyer not bring up said factoid during the course of a civil trial to "prove" Sig's negligence in relation to his client's injury?
Police don't have manual safeties on their P320s, this would do nothing for the case because the patent is specifically for a manual safety.What I mean is, say a P320 allegedly goes off in a Cop's Safariland and the bullet shatters his femur, could said cop's lawyer not bring up said factoid during the course of a civil trial to "prove" Sig's negligence in relation to his client's injury?
There was a recent ruling on the P320 where a jury found it to be defective but didnt receive any damages from the suit because the jury found the officer should’ve known it was defectiveWhen a defective product causes injury, that's usually actionable.
Why is David Cross looking at me like that?
The dog caught the car and now knows not what to do with it.
Seems to be a rebrand of an underwhelming chinesium dot.while i'm at it what's the word on that eotech EFLX?
Interesting. Phil specifically mentioned that patent in his interview a few days ago.You know that Safety enhancement/modification patent from that ex Sig engineer? Well apparently the patent was offered for sale to Sig in 2023, they refused.
Phil Strader - VP of Consumer Affairs at SIG Sauer said:...you know, that's like adding a a fifth set of brakes to your a fifth tire and another set of brakes to your car. If the car stops way within uh normal, then what what are you doing? So, I would assume that's that's what happen. But uh you know we can't control what people who were uh terminated from us, we can't control if they're going to go down that road
Why is David Cross looking at me like that?
He is an analrapist after all.Bend over and he'll show you.
yeah man the best i could find from online reviews was "yeah it's a red dot it's pretty cool i guess." i was hoping there was a little more to it if eotech was going for that teeny red dot market but if it's got nothing going on i don't see a point for going with them opposed to something like a holosun. i suppose it's all just a game to find a way to not pay the cost of an RMR.Seems to be a rebrand of an underwhelming chinesium dot.
I was never a fan of the RMR because of the need to remove it to replace the batteries.yeah man the best i could find from online reviews was "yeah it's a red dot it's pretty cool i guess." i was hoping there was a little more to it if eotech was going for that teeny red dot market but if it's got nothing going on i don't see a point for going with them opposed to something like a holosun. i suppose it's all just a game to find a way to not pay the cost of an RMR.
How many times have I visited a "local small gun shop" only to be treated rudely by the employees. Treated with suspicion, hostility, or acting like you walking into the store is a major annoyance for them because they were busy hanging out in a circle around the counter having a meandering conversation with their Fudd pals and act like customers wanting to potentially exchange money for goods or service is a great inconvenience.
How many times have I visited a "local small gun shop" only to be treated rudely by the employees. Treated with suspicion, hostility, or acting like you walking into the store is a major annoyance for them because they were busy hanging out in a circle around the counter having a meandering conversation with their Fudd pals and act like customers wanting to potentially exchange money for goods or service is a great inconvenience.