Balldo MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[AltisticRight]

I'm just going to say if the document is fake, it's a convincing one.

The judge that signed this off is a medical expert.

The timestamped signature in the document isn't just any mspaint paste, it appears to be a verified electronic signature.

 

[TurdThrower]

https://www.nydrugtesting.com/forms/docs/hair%20drug%20panels%20and%20cutoff%20levels.pdf

What it means is that the Rekietas aren't getting out from under the child abuse/endangerment charges. That kid, barely 9, tested positive for cocaine at 10x the cutoff level. 500pg/mg of hair is the cutoff level. Anything below that is considered a negative result for the purposes of the test. 500-2000pg indicates "low use" or "recreational use". 2000-10000pg indicates "medium use" or "daily/weekends". It's a hair follicle test so it's not like the kid just got into the coke stash one time and got messed up from playing around. Someone was dosing her with the stuff.

What was it he said that one time? Something about a wall.

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

I wonder if one of the kids complained of something like a headache, and in her pilled up stupor she accidentally gave her coke instead of a BC headache powder or a Tylenol pill.

The balldoguard will just use this as evidence supporting their cope that the drugs belonged to the children.

To test that hot means it wasn't a one-time thing

 

[Vibralldo]

View attachment 6101576
WTH!!!! IS THIS TRUE!??!?!

If this is true, I hate Nick and Kayla so fucking much. They deserve the rope. I feel sick.

"Come on, 9 year olds can have a little bit of cocaine! What are you, a prude?!"
-Faggots who should be put up against the wall and gunned down by the government for reals in real life

 

[Anstiv]

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

Bros, this isn't funny anymore

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

So the 9 year old daughter tested right in the middle of the "Medium use (daily/weekends)" range. What an absolute scum-fuck piece of shit.



What's the best case scenario for how this happened? Little 9 year old girl wants to be near her parents and so sneaks into parents bedroom habitually and habitually comes in contact with the coke dusting their bed? How does this amount in a child not absolutely get Nick dragged behind a pick-up?

 

[dustnight]

WTH!!!! IS THIS TRUE!??!?!

If this is true, I hate Nick and Kayla so fucking much. They deserve the rope. I feel sick.

 

[Blackhole]

Letting a 9 year old recreationally use cocaine is the libertarian method of parenting, you Scandinavian incel prudes just don't understand the Rekieta lifestyle.

 

[Eyesore City]

She didn't just test positive, but way hot. 500mg was the cutoff on that hair follicle test. Audryrose's level was over 5000. She just turned 9 years old last week, BTW.

That's 500 picogram per milligram of hair. 5000 milligrams would be 5 grams of cocaine.

https://www.questdiagnostics.com/business-solutions/employers/drug-screening/products-services/hair-testing/process-certifications

Edit: Thread moving too fast. Someone else covered above.

 

[GenociderSyo]

Hair tests in children also look at passive exposure. Remember the child is not just exposed because they ingest it, but it being cut around them it being around them. They get curious and touch things. There are many studies showing high levels of cocaine in hair test in children who were not activel taking it due to living in drug dens. It just proves hes been exposing that child for a long time passively and since it looks back about a month that means its been around her that entire month at least.

 

[MNPublicRecords]

Is that real?

Balldowashers would insist that it's merely "alleged" by the state but yes, the document itself is genuine. Unfortunately CHIPS cases are not searchable in the online version of the court website, but they can be viewed by any member of the public at Courthouse View public access terminals in any given county courthouse.

P.S. Attached are a JPG version of the complete order for clipping convenience on various other interesting highlights, such as the Rekietas revoking consent to fork over their drug test results, the Rekietas refusing access to the bedroom on a post-arrest child protection site visit, several quotes suggesting that the kids may still be in regular foster care rather than with grandparents as originally assumed, etc. All big if true.

 

[macrodegenerate]

View attachment 6101237

T | A

Here we go, no more safe space streams. Will he be standing or sitting?

@AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed You know what must be done.

 

[Null]

A practicing MN attorney puts the chance of authenticity at 60%. They say that the document looks very real in some places and sloppy in others, but that sloppiness can be expected in an emergency protective order. They also say the appearances look somewhat fake.

They say there is no way that the state will confirm this document, JV documents are not available online, and it would be illegal to create a digital copy of this document for distribution, which is why the account that posted it is a burner.

 

[TurdThrower]

Juneteenth

shit I forgot, it is practically a holiday for Nick tomorrow

 

[Green Kitbash]

Guys guys guys

Maybe they were so paranoid about the cops showing up they decided that hiding the coke in their daughter was the best option!

(yes I made this joke elsewhere, I'm out of further material)

 

[Joggin Noggin]

I swear to fucking God if this is real and this bitch has been moralizing about how no one knows the real story, I'm going to become mad at the internet. (If true) Nick, WHY DOES YOUR KID HAVE COKE IN THEM????

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

If this is legit how would it leak?

 

[Mr. Manchester]

So if this is real the document was filed on 6/7/24. Nick's arrest was 5/23/24 so in two fucking weeks he didn't bother to attempt to clean his filthy house even when knowing child services was going to inspect it.

I'm not surprised he doesn't give a shit but it's still disgusting. You'd think that maybe a little bit of shame would force him to at least create a scenario where he could say that his house wasn't a pit but I guess you can't squeeze water from a stone. I'm not even at the point where I can process the 9 year old testing positive for cocaine. This is one of those things that I have a gut feeling is real but I really hope that it isn't.

Have fun streaming tonight Nick.

 

[Null]

Balldowashers would insist that it's merely "alleged" by the state but yes, the document itself is genuine. Unfortunately CHIPS cases are not searchable in the online version of the court website, but they can be viewed by any member of the public at Courthouse View public access terminals in any given county courthouse.

MN attorney says that a JV file should not be accessible at any terminal and if it is that is a clerical error. MN draws attention to "The foster parents also appeared" as their identity is a crucial detail and its omission is suspicious.

Edit: "with and for the children" is ambiguous and doesn't actually indicate if the children are there, and since they're so young it seems silly regardless. Attorney does say that it's a template order that's been rush edited so it may be because of that, hence the 60% sure.

 

[Adroc Thurston]

Gonna be an interesting stream tonight...
If what is true about the kid taking coke, rackets should literally go down to the police station and admit it right now.
The poor child and the rest of the children will be in a tough spot for the foreseeable future; I pray that they don't fall under the care of their coke-fueled drunk and irrepressible parents anytime soon (I'd say at all, but I don't know how all of the children feel, if the children don't want to go back to the den of degeneracy, then they should'nt be forced to go back to it under any condition).