- Joined
- May 28, 2024
Why are there so many retards obsessed with Rekieta's kids being raped?
Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
- Thread starter MNPublicRecords
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Status
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
tl:dr -- that read like the obsessive ramblings of somebody high on cocaine.
Desktop User2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
We don´t even have exactly what the test detected, the CPS docs used a general "cocaine" designator. People are fixated on this idea that what was reported could only be an insurmountable amount of cocaine to kill all the 80s disco scene but what does that amount of god knows which metabolite they identified translates into cocaine shooted up, snorted, ingested, took up the ass adjusted for a 9yo? I remember a post when the thread was young and more relevant where @Dyn said it could be a plausible quantity. Did anyone else who really knows about the matter said something different?
Edit: @Fapcop also posted an article about screenings returning bigger numbers if the coke was ingested, if I´m not mistaken.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
500pg/mg would be the level of cocaine itself, and it's not a particularly high amount. We don't know if this means she took one stupidly big dose a while back, or was taking semi-regular normal doses, or just got some coke in her hair a month or two ago. Without being able to see the actual test results all three possibilities are plausible. Judging from what Nick said, he's going to argue for the latter, so maybe he's seen the full test results and they do indicate external contamination, or maybe they're typical cocaine-user readings and he's just a desperate retard trying anything he think might work.
In any case, can we please get some more child-rape fanfics in the thread those never get old and people aren't sus at all for posting them.
Konstantin Romanov
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
That was about screenings returning different ratios of metabolites to cocaine, nothing in that article indicated that the printed number should be expected to be higher. The usual format would be to print the level of cocaine, you test for the presence and ratio of metabolites only to confirm the cocaine was ingested.
Even if, for some reason, the test was printing the level of only benzoylecgonine found by the GC-MS, (the only metabolite found in larger concentrations after oral ingestion than snorting in the study in question) the reaction that produces benzoy is 1-1, so you would have to orally ingest the same amount of cocaine to sequester that level of benzoy as you would have to snort (or otherwise rapidly absorb) to sequester that level of cocaine.
That's if it's printed from the GC-MS results not the EIA, because the EIA reports only the level of cocaine, with small crossreactions from metabolites, 5% in the case of benzoy, so even if all the coke she ingested was magically turned into benzoy, the EIA would print a result 1/20th of the magnitude the dose would suggest. (1/15-ish more accurately taking into account the ratio in which cocaine is typically metabolized after snorting but it's a distinction without a difference)
I think you mean 5000, 500 is the negligible cutoff.
Last edited:
bread n circuses
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2019
It also strikes me that Rekieta and his wife are far too retarded and drugged up at this point to keep something so nefarious secret. If nothing indicating sexual abuse has come out by now, it’s extremely unlikely it ever will. Everything about his behaviour is consistent with being a degenerate drug addict, none of it is consistent with being a Fritzl-style incestuous pervert.
His kids were part of a community homeschooling system, the chances that one of the adults responsible for them there or at their church would not pick up on the daughter being a drugged up abuse victim are negligible. They were reported to police for neglecting their kids, not grooming them.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
That is NOT the theory. The theory is she got a massive overdose, in the time period Nick was blowing off streams claiming some kind of a "family health emergency" and this was an OD where he chose not to take her to the ER and instead just kind of hope she didn't die. Because this is just the kind of thing that always happens "if you're a dad."
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
No. The home is still unsafe for children
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
I always interpreted "family emergency" as bullshit - hangovers or partying or just dudnt feel like it. Like "my (already dead, or thriving) grandmother died" excuses for blowing off work.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Has anyone considered that the reason the tests pinged for "cocaine" is because the kid was taking the metabolites like benzoylecgonine directly as part of Kayla's homeopathic salves? When I was a kid my mom would give me pure "ec-go" whenever I had so much as the sniffles. Nasty stuff, and if you accidentally left the cap off the bottle niggers would start sniffing around.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Nobody's considered that because it's retarded.
People need to quit inventing fantastic and bizarre excuses for Nick not being guilty of what he's proven to be guilty of.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
Is the 9 year old fucked for life now after having that much cocaine in her system? I don't know anything about addiction and withdrawals, how long cravings last or any of that, but if Nick is an indicator of how it affects adults...
I dunno, man. Can the kid recover, or is this going to be something she struggles with forever now?
I dunno, man. Can the kid recover, or is this going to be something she struggles with forever now?
Desktop User2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
Can you infer the amount of cocaine ingested if it was in fact ingested? Is the distribution of cocaine even on your body so you can just multiply her weight and deduce the amount of cocaine ingested?
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
Yes I meant that.
No. The coke could have been ingested yesterday, or months ago, or all at once, or in daily microdoses, and then you'd have to factor in her metabolic rate and etc. etc. to the point that you might as well just be randomly picking a number.
Desktop User2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
That´s what I imagined and pushed back against the notion of the impossible dose. But if it was a single event, can you consider the coke evenly distributed and make the extrapolation?
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2022
Jesus Christ. When the argument becomes is this child doing fat rails or is the house so contaminated that they got it from food/salves/surfaces. Lazy fucking cunts probably did it off kitchen worktop or something. I am truly MATI, hope his next baggie is mixed with fent.
Sector2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
What? It's entirely possible and even typical to ingest some amount of cocaine, even over time, then decide it's not for you and just stop ingesting it. Addiction is a whole separate thing related to psychological problems. (including excessive use that results in physical dependancy) The 9 year old testing positive for cocaine does not mean she's now a lifetime cocaine addict.
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
It depends. If it was the one megadose she didn't have time to get addicted. If Nick was dosing her over time? She definitely could be addicted and will have her dopamine receptors fucked up before puberty.
...jesus christ Nick is honestly making me think of a 9 year old cocaine addict thanks to his hedonism.
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
Hi there.
1. The amount that was found (5000 pg/mg) corresponds to the bottom 10% of adult cocaine users. So it's significant but not stratospheric (for an adult).
Note: chart units are in ng/mg so multiply by 1000
Self reported adult cocaine users have cocaine levels in their hair between 480 pg/mg up to 190,000 pg/mg with a median of 10,000 pg/mg.
Another way to look at it is the amount found in Rekieta's daughter's hair was half the median level found in the hair of self-admitted adult cocaine users.
2. Without hair sectioning, no one can make any scientific claim (based on the existing results) about whether this is a single exposure or multiple exposure.
3. False positives? What!!!! Not possible you say! @Null ive tagged you because yesterday on mati you said mere cocaine powder on the hair would not trigger a hair test. But that's actually not true. Cocaine powder on the hair can trigger a typical GC/MS hair test... @Dyn shared a study showing that you can easily create a false positive on a typical GC/MS hair test with as little as 1/50 of a gram cocaine rubbed into the hair. I wrote further details about the study and it's applicability to Rekieta in this post
Cocaine Hydroxy Metabolites in Hair: Indicators for Cocaine Use Versus External Contamination
The most important point is that this clinical study from 2021 showed that you can trigger cocaine hair test false positive merely by rubbing a small amount (1/50 gram) of cocaine into the hair. This can result in false positives up to eight weeks or more after the hair is contaminated topically with powder cocaine.
When 20mg of cocaine was directly rubbed into 21 different volunteers' hair in a clinical study, a variety of cocaine metabolites were produced external to the body (in the hair follicle) that were previously thought only to be created in the liver after cocaine ingestion. The levels produced were sufficient to exceed standard hair test cutoffs and produce positive test results.
4. A false positive of the girl getting cocaine in her hair can only be definitively ruled out by checking specific metabolic ratios of the para and meta hydroxy cocaine and benzoylecgonine metabolites. Does Minnesota monitoring do this? Unknown. According to @AltisticRight it seems their specific GC/MS probably resolves the presence and concentration of these structural isomers, but whether they are actually calculating the most state-of-the-art metabolic ratios is not known.
Note the above chart from the study dyn found shows that you can completely eliminate false positives by checking the metabolic ratios I've highlighted . (Because then the test specificity statistic hits 100% aka no false positives in theory)
Testing the following metabolic ratios is the only way to completely rule out topical hair contamination.
• p-OH-COC/COC
• p-OH-BE/COC
• m-OH-BE/COC
We don't know if Minnesota Monitoring tests these specific ratios or not and how these compounds figure into their testing protocol.
If Nick maintains that his daughter did not consume cocaine he should release the full test results and/or commission an independent test that checks the above three metabolic ratios. However it is my personal opinion that Nick's daughter ingested cocaine. Prove everyone wrong Nick.
- Status