NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

[Ineedahero]

View attachment 219439
https://archive.is/ifmGM

"Look at this guy, he thinks you shouldn't treat people differently because of their beliefs. Nice rationality pal, I bet you also think people shouldn't destroy public and private property because of beliefs too, and that anyone who does should face the consequences. Go back to never getting thrown in prison because you follow the law, whitey."

I wonder how many decades it will be before this kind of stuff is just viewed as an extension of anti-semitism? Like until scholars are all 'there was another resurgence of anti-semitism in the early 21st century, bearing all of the same hallmarks - damned by birth, societal rulers, participants in oppressive in-grouping, corrupting influence on power, secretly murderous - but widened to include not just semetic and white Jews, but all white men.'

 

[Vault Boy]

Oh look, another Gaffot calling for a military coup to overthrow Trump.

Outside of being outright treasonous, an actual military coup would probably end poorly for these guys.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

"Look at this guy, he thinks you shouldn't treat people differently because of their beliefs. Nice rationality pal, I bet you also think people shouldn't destroy public and private property because of beliefs too, and that anyone who does should face the consequences. Go back to never getting thrown in prison because you follow the law, whitey."

I wonder how many decades it will be before this kind of stuff is just viewed as an extension of anti-semitism? Like until scholars are all 'there was another resurgence of anti-semitism in the early 21st century, bearing all of the same hallmarks - damned by birth, societal rulers, participants in oppressive in-grouping, corrupting influence on power, secretly murderous - but widened to include not just semetic and white Jews, but all white men.'

No, they'll just say it was a time when autism became more common due to greater parental age.

 

[AnOminous]

Oh look, another Gaffot calling for a military coup to overthrow Trump.

Outside of being outright treasonous, an actual military coup would probably end poorly for these guys.

They don't realize they're the mirror image of the racists who called for a military coup to oust Obama because REEEE REEEE NIGGER PRESIDENT, while similarly not realizing that very military is disproportionately African-American (one of the few occasions where this quaint hyphenization is actually appropriate).

It's also disproportionately poor white trash, and probably also disproportionately Trump-supporting, although that might not be the case.

The military population is somewhat unpredictable. In 2008, Obama and Ron Paul both beat veteran John McCain in campaign donations from active military. I think Ron Paul ended up on top, but Obama still beat McCain.

In any event, though, the delusions of fanatics that the military will somehow go apeshit and depose the lawful government in this country is reserved for lunatics. This is a country where that is an absurdly unlikely event.

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

"...considering the kids gender won't really be revealed until they are old enough to tell you."

Penis & testicles for a boy, vagina for a girl. It's not rocket science to figure it out.

I've got a compromise: raise your kid as the gender implied by their physical genitals. 99.9985% of the time, you will be correct. In the unlikely event of the remainder, just be willing to have a conversation and don't beat your kids for being gay or whatever.

It just seems that would be far less damaging then raising a child to pretend gender doesn't exist, while he/she is surrounded by a world that acknowledges it obviously does. The kid will be real unpopular and not develop social skills if he has to interrupt other people 30 times a day to politely ask "please don't assume my gender".

 

[Munchingonfish]

The "Would you date someone from your opposite political party?" thread is hysterical. The answer most are giving is an emphatic no, which is very optimistic for them to assume they'd have a choice of who wants to date them. Everyone on the other side is a bigot, Nazi, et cetera.

Amir0x says he'd be able to date a "classic" conservative.

I could in theory date someone who was an old school Republican moderate, 1990s style. But I cannot even associate with someone who voted Trump, my own family and ex-friends included. So dating is obviously out of the question. No time to coddle monsters.

It requires such a level of intellectual dishonesty to defend Trump, that it basically amounts to wholesale lying to oneself. And if one has the ability to be that dishonest with themselves, a relationship is a disaster waiting to happen.

Just a reminder, to survive the 2012 elections he bought oxy, coke, heroin and weed. Mitt Romney caused Amir0x to raid a local dealer's stash.

Elsewhere, someone dares to say not every Trump supporter is a Nazi and finds Neogaf's lust for violence disgusting. This disturbs the hive. Almost all of the usual suspects are out in force.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

I've got a compromise: raise your kid as the gender implied by their physical genitals. 99.9985% of the time, you will be correct. In the unlikely event of the remainder, just be willing to have a conversation and don't beat your kids for being gay or whatever.

It just seems that would be far less damaging then raising a child to pretend gender doesn't exist, while he/she is surrounded by a world that acknowledges it obviously does. The kid will be real unpopular and not develop social skills if he has to interrupt other people 30 times a day to politely ask "please don't assume my gender".

Most children who demand not to have their gender assumed have no social skills anyway. Half of children referred to gender clinics in the UK are autistic.

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

Elsewhere, someone dares to say not every Trump supporter is a Nazi and finds Neogaf's lust for violence disgusting. This disturbs the hive. Almost all of the usual suspects are out in force.

I can't seem to find a single one of them willing to give a clear answer to the OP's question of how "nazi" should be defined.

 

[Ineedahero]

I can't seem to find a single one of them willing to give a clear answer to the OP's question of how "nazi" should be defined.

It's pretty amusing watching them accuse people opposed to violence of bad faith and ignorance while they veer between posting pictures of piles of bones as what they are stopping and tiptoeing around saying who they think will cause that.



Lol, this thread is gold. After the users asking troubling questions about who gets to define nazi leave the thread the gaffots get back into cheering for violence, and laughing to each other about how those pathetic moderates just love nazis and hate blacks, and they are never able to prove talking does anything. Then I guess some nazi moderate troll popped up to mention mlk jr (I say I guess because there's no post mentioning him, so it was presumably deleted) and now they are flipping out about that.

We have nel e nel saying I feel like mentioning MLK in these types of threads is the new Godwin. Which is pretty understandable - if every time I tried to justify my lust for ideological violence someone was able to shut me down with five letters I would want that argument declared invalid too.

We also have The Kree saying Like I always say: when someone tells you to be like MLK and keep the peace, what they're really telling you is to die already. Which reminds me of that bit in Bowfinger where Eddie Murphy loses his shit at his agent for bringing him a Shakespeare script - "You want me to be like MLK Jr? What, so you want me to get shot?"

And finally, my favourite, where Slayven says Folks need to keep MLK Jr out their mouths until they ready to be honest


If MLK Jr did it right, why did he get a bullet in his head? Why did the cia want to blackmail him? Yeah! Checkmate atheists! MLK Jr got shot! The cia tried to blackmail him! Ipso facto he must have been wrong, otherwise the cia would have given him handjobs and bullets would have bounced right off him or something! You see, it doesn't matter that mlk changed the way almost the entire country viewed civil rights - because he didn't change the mind of literally every single person in the country, all of his efforts were for nothing. And he had government agencies against him! Everyone knows that the cia always does the right thing, so if they were trying to blackmail him it couldn't be because some of themselves weren't racist, or because a bunch of his inner circle were former communists, it was because he wasn't stomping heads. If only he had been, he might still be alive today.

Edit 2: And on page 6 we finally get an answer for who qualifies as a nazi, with The Kree replying to someone saying defunding social services and deportation aren't nazi tactics, they are just Republican and that their view seems more like "punch any Republican of the last 40 years" logic, not "punch Nazis" logic with Not sure I see a meaningful difference right now. I know what happens after all those protections are finally eroded.

Followed by Ponn saying Why do you think ALL these groups are Republicans and vote Republican? Why do you think the GOP has been catering to them for years now with dog whistles and now a president that is openly flagrant with ideals like rounding up certain minorities into camps and wants to ban others and deport more? Where exactly is your "Cross the line" at? I can guarantee wherever it is it's too late to do jack shit. If you have the privilege to sit on the sidelines and feel you won't be affected that's an option I guess.

There are still a few Republican gaffots right? I wonder how long it will be before these guys get banned for advocating violence against them?

 

[Munchingonfish]

I can't seem to find a single one of them willing to give a clear answer to the OP's question of how "nazi" should be defined.

Roman Catholics are Nazis.

So I have noticed this in the past few years. I dont go to church often but for I believe to be the last few years or so there has been this new thing that they do each time. Everyone stands up and raises their right arms in the direction of the water and priest at one point and it lasts for a few minutes. Their arms are raised high and it looks like a Nazi rally. As a child they never did such a thing this is relatively new. Its a Roman catholic church so not sure if others do it. Has anyone else noticed this? I have googled and only found a few things commenting about it but no reasons for it.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

Roman Catholics are Nazis.

The water? Like, the tiny water decanter they use to dilute the wine? Or are they installing wave pools these days?

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

Roman Catholics are Nazis.

Perfect! I'm glad we finally have a specific answer. I look forward to that poster sacking up, putting his money where his mouth is, and going to a church with his fist ready.

 

[Munchingonfish]

That thread reminded me of a thread where the OP believed a charity group was the KKK.

I'm organizing protests at John Galts, a local coffee shop off the main street where you See the UNC campus and Cheeba Hut.

We will organize, discuss tactics and strategem as well as a lay out a formal plan of attack. Something I've devised but I want to make this a combined, group effort.

Part of that plan is establishing community awareness to prevent, report, and highlight hate crimes against minorities and the LGBTQ community, doubly so since there is a KKK chapterhouse in Garden City.

For those not aware, the Knights of Columbus are part of the KKK.

We must Resist, we must Organize, we must Fight.

If you want to meet with me or have any questions, shoot me a PM or just show up this Monday at JGs.

EDIT: Do not attack the Knights of columbus, they are not a part of the KKK. My parents have mislead me my entire life.

Hilariously, the same guy is in that Nazi PR thread calling other people dangerous idiots.

You'd think a member who tried to launch a violent witch hunt against a church group and then sounded suicidal after finding out he was wrong wouldn't be allowed back in any community.

 

[Raging Capybara]

Has any accounts of a NeoFAG member an-heroing?

 

[RockVolnutt]

That thread reminded me of a thread where the OP believed a charity group was the KKK.

Why is it always the KKK with these people? Isn't their membership so low nowadays that they're almost nonexistent?

 

[Feline Darkmage]

Why is it always the KKK with these people? Isn't their membership so low nowadays that they're almost nonexistent?

And it's mostly FBI Agents keeping eyes on the genuine ones these days anyway.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Why is it always the KKK with these people? Isn't their membership so low nowadays that they're almost nonexistent?

The membership is about 6000. Still more than NeoGAF.

 

[Munchingonfish]

Elsewhere, someone dares to say not every Trump supporter is a Nazi and finds Neogaf's lust for violence disgusting. This disturbs the hive. Almost all of the usual suspects are out in force.

A mod I had never heard of has called this guy a Nazi.

The problem here is not supporting Trump. If you had said: I support Trump, because "I believe he will create jobs" or because "I don't like paying taxes" or because "I think security is important" or whatever non-racist reason, while explicitly distancing yourself from the white nationalist, xenophobic bullshit, you would probably still not be very popular on OT-GAF, but pretty fucking far from any danger of being banned.

The major problem, Bamelin, is that you actively, repeatedly and explicitly promote racist conspiracies, alt-right, white nationalist bullshit ideas and concepts like "cultural marxism" (which you call a "cancer"). If you don't want to be called a Nazi, perhaps don't use concepts with a genealogy that can be traced directly back to Nazis? Now, I don't much care that you apparently are unfamiliar with the connotations and the historical context of this particular concept. But you still don't get to promote white nationalist conspiracy theories and concepts while pretending (or believing sincerely - it doesn't really matter) that for you they only have a positive, merry let's-all-go-along meaning: "When I say 'Cultural Marxism is a cancer', I simply mean that we should all get along and make America great again!" No, it does not work like that. It's like calling someone a "n*gger", getting called out, and say: "to me it just means buddy!", raising the confederate flag because to you it has a positive and nostalgic good ol' south meaning, or getting a swastika tattoo on your forehead because you are so into ancient Indian religious bullshit. Concepts, ideas and symbols don't work like that. All I ask for, really, is some minimum of social awareness.

The same goes for the other dumb alt-right talking points you spread around, like the idea that "poor white males" are the really oppressed in america (identity politics btw), and the idea of some sort of and utopian american civic nationalism, where race, sex and class doesn't matter, and where everyone is treated equally because every American is DA BEST. America does not and has never worked like that. You are going to offend people of color or people who are lgbqt when you tell them that their issues and problems would totally go away if they just don a MAGA cap and start believing in the greatness of america. Again, a minimum of social awareness of how you conduct yourself toward other people.

All of these issues probably arise mostly from spending too much time on /thedonald and god knows which else alt-right echo chambers you frequent. I don't think it stems from you being a particularly horrible person. But at some point you have to learn that an upvote on /thedonald does not mean that these white supremacist ideas and concepts are legitimate, unproblematic, and perfectly fine to throw around in the real world without consequences.

And while I do appreciate that you are not calling other posters cucks and libtards or whatever, which seems to be the default mode of engaging in debate from your circles, I am not going to tolerate any further promotion of white nationalist ideas on your end what so ever.

If you don't want someone to call you a cuck, don't give actual cuckolds a platform.

The truth hurts.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

A mod I had never heard of has called this guy a Nazi.



If you don't want someone to call you a cuck, don't give actual cuckolds a platform.

View attachment 220056
The truth hurts.

"ancient Indian religious bullshit"

And yet Islam is off limits for criticism.

The presence of literal cucks in this movement is what led to the term getting shouted as an insult in the first place.

 

[Munchingonfish]

Another member made a thread about that lady getting dragged into the pool. Locked after 12 posts.

"There's really nothing to discuss here, and it was already posted and then locked for the same reason."

If there was nothing to talk about, there wouldn't be two separate threads about it.

Drunk white male punches black security guard lady. 135 posts and counting.

I wonder how long it took the OP to find a crime in Chicago that didn't have a black person as the perp.