- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
It sounds like Bond is a side character in his own movie, first of all. Since the franchise is built around him, that seems like the first, and fatal, mistake.
The second, of course, is having a stronk woman of color have and keep the 007 number all movie, stripping Bond of that iconic moniker. (Though he'd been in 'retirement' or 'rogue' before he always returned to it by movie's end.)
The third big issue is the deviation too far from the formula of high espionage pseudo-fantasy. Bond is always best with over-the-top exotic locations, women, and villains with grandiose plans - this more 'realistic' version manages to be simultaneously grounded while impossible to believe. Why try so hard to ape Bourne when you already can work so well with your established brand and formula?
Finally, we come to the big SJW lie they always spew to puff themselves up. ThIS wIlL bE tHe FiRsT sTrOnK POC wOmAn!!!!! When Bond movies have have several powerful, amazing and sexy women in them.
Like Grace Jones in A View to Kill
Or Michelle Yeoh in Tomorrow Never Dies
These fuckers are so pathetic that they either don't know its already been done or they just ignore it so they can jerk themselves raw about their 'accomplishments'.
Hang em' high and let them swing, I say - but the box office returns oughta gut them for us.
What's worse is the new black Bond is hideous. How is she a secret agent when she's a remarkable ugly woman who is built like a man? She'll stand out wherever she goes, she has no spy potential whatsoever. What is she going to infiltrate? She will be useless at wooing men or women. Where in the world would anyone put trust in that? Not many places, that's for sure. It doesn't make sense.
