Maybe because I've just been watching a lot of crime documentaries but the amount of these that end up in a woman dying because some scrote can't take "no" for an answer is insane.
I believe that the rise of True Crime being more accessible than ever has a lot to do with the so-called “male loneliness epidemic”.
While one can argue that the genre is exploitative, the hindsight in 20/20 that it offers has a lot to teach young women when it comes to red flags displayed by Moids. Aside from being unable to take “no” for an answer, many of them also tend to be massive control freaks with overbearing parents that enable them along the way.
Many of them didn't start out being physically abusive, but they did start out by being emotionally abusive. They're quick to nitpick everyone who isn't them while refusing to acknowledge their own shortcomings.
Joshua Powell is a perfect example of how an abuser can reveal his true colors even during the “honeymoon phase” at the beginning of a relationship. He had a perverted, porn addicted father and didn't like it when Susan would go out and do things by herself (even when she wanted some alone time).
Randy Stair and Stephen McDaniel are the perfect examples as to why many Moids are loners and should be avoided. It has nothing to do with bullying and everything to do with their inability to interact with people in a normal way. Delightfully autistic Moids with train obsessions are one thing; porn addiction with an emphasis on degrading women is a whole other ballpark.
Knowing how to tell the difference between a delightful autist and a porn addict is crucial these days.
Problem is with the loners is that you never know which one you'll encounter and make the mistake of being nice to.
In the case of McDaniel, all Lauren Giddings ever did “wrong” was be nice to him just because he was a lonely weirdo she thought to be harmless.
Luckily, most women now steer clear of those types of guys; many of whom become incels.
Incels are the result of being weeded out as potential abusers and family annhilators. Notice their language when they talk about wanting families, and you'll quickly notice that they only see biological children as extensions of themselves. Nothing more.
My blackpill today has been seeing more and more men, atheist and Christian, come around publicly on porn being objectively evil, but their talking points are always based around seeing the effect it has on themselves and their marriages and sons. Nobody gives a fuck that it’s trafficked women and children, nobody stops to think that the women in porn are tragically debased/debasing themselves in a most unnatural way, that there are multiple very well supported pipelines to funnel young women into this direction and zero support to escape once they get there
They don't care about the trafficking aspect because the idea of jerking off to filmed rape to them is something they don't wish to confront.
There is something deeply unsettling about enjoying a piece of media that you find out later has its origins in debasing another human being. Facing the reality is too much for these scrotes, it involves admitting that they did/do benefit from sex trafficking.
Just look at the type of responses they have when told that the films they watched involved underaged parties, and they'll have a million excuses to downplay it.
I remember when Rose Kambala talked about the fact that her rapist uploaded a video of him raping her when she was 14, many of the responses from scrotes were asking where they can find it so they can jerk off to it.
I will crosspost this from BadEmpanada’s thread, where he openly admits to wanting to see videos of Isreali children getting raped by Hamas terrorists:

And he looks as disgusting and unkempt as you would expect him to,
as seen here. I ain't saving that photo on my phone cause his face and pubic hair beard make me puke.