- Joined
- May 30, 2021
- Highlight
- #9,961
happy 500 pages you fujoshis 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No @Love Machine is right. The sex ratio is roughly 50:50. ( actually a little bit skewed towards males because males die more. ) whether you’d like it to be different isnt the point, the point is that is is fifty fifty. That means that is the stable point in the distribution because if it wasn’t, the ratio would be different. There’s a lot of work done on sex ratios in various creatures, and in the pressure that can skew them one way or another. The fact it’s fifty fifty means that it works most optimally. Societies that have drifted away via female infanticide or war face significant social problems and the sex ratio is pressed back towards the mean over time. Fifty fifty is the most evolutionarily’fit’ ratio. If we could manage with fewer men nature would have already done that.Yeah. What I mean to say is that a bunch of men can get killed mining the coal and fighting the war and hunting those mammoths; and even if there were half as many of you (because you died) the human race could still probably get on without too much trouble.
Have you ever worked in a corporate environment? Men and women are awful as leaders in their own way. The ‘powerful’ women I’ve worked with were dreadful - petty, bitchy, snide, held grudges forever and worked to utterly destroy fellow female workers. The men express their awfulness with outright aggression, which is also bad, but if you think women high up in the corporate world are empathetic and effective leaders I’d like to know where you’re working so I can apply there. You don’t get high up the corporate tree without having your humanity removed, whether you’re male or female. I can count the number of ‘decent’ leaders I’ve encountered on one hand, and they’re split roughly fifty fifty. This is the same rubbish as ‘lady leaders dealt with Covid better’ to get people to simp for horrors like jacinda ArdenUnsurprisingly women make much better leaders because women are more responsible, show empathy to their employees instead of playing out some power fantasy and don't have random testosterone fueled tardouts or pick their employees based on who gives them the biggest boner/who they want to go golfing with.
No, I just hate men enough right now to fantasize about what life would be like with 50% fewer of you.Wait are you genuinely arguing for the anime harem trope to replace the nuclear family?
Name one social problem caused by this, that wasn't also exacerbated by men being selfish idiots.Societies that have drifted away via female infanticide or war face significant social problems
Oh based, the pre-colonial Maori had a notable disparity by way of constant warfare, but decent sources on just how extreme it was and how it actually affected gender politics are rare to nonexistent. I found the first couple sections of this to be a pretty interesting take on the subject though.No, I just hate men enough right now to fantasize about what life would be like with 50% fewer of you.
Sex ratio imbalance causes significant social problems, always. China has a problem with girls being kidnapped and a huge number of dissatisfied young men who could destabilise the government. Huge numbers of men dying in war leads to fewer men back home, more widows and families with no provider,Name one social problem caused by this,
This is disingenuous because any issue I raise you will sneer and say it’s just men being selfish idiots. The fact is that a significant sex imbalance is always a problem. It’s a problem when girls are aborted - it leads to the societal impression that women are lesser, and resources going to males, then twenty years down the line shit there’s no women, ok now I have nothing to live for let’s overthrow the government. A huge cohort of men dying for example in WW1 and WW2 led to a significant change in fertility for a while. Women have less choice and thus settle for lower quality mates. Fewer men actually makes things worse for women because they have to compete moresthat wasn't also exacerbated by men being selfish idiots.
He is 18. I am in no way considering doing it. I want to know if I can use his demand against him.How old is the boyfriend?If you trade him sex for the cat, you're engaging in prostitution.
Tried that. Officer said it was a civil matter and wouldn't take the report. This was before the daughter's ex made his demand.You can file a police report for your stolen property.
Because literally are issues are.This is disingenuous because any issue I raise you will sneer and say it’s just men being selfish idiots.
It's the reverse, the fuck? Girls are aborted because they are considered lesser than men, not the opposite.It’s a problem when girls are aborted - it leads to the societal impression that women are lesser
Sounds like a skill issue.Fewer men actually makes things worse for women because they have to compete mores
I'd rather see fewer men than all the trogdolyte shreks messing up my field of vision with ugly.It rebounds fairly rapidly (within a lifetime or two) probably because the optimum for human society is 50:50.
Like duuude, I get it. You must firmly plant yourself in the belief that "I don't see sex" meritocracy works because the reality of other women you deem lesser might have become as successful as you are had they not been held back by society is frightening. Representation in media is merely a symptom of the problem.I don’t think I ever did ask if women could be what I am. I just went and did it. The scientists on TV were men and I never even considered a girl couldn’t do that. I was told plenty that women didn’t do that kind of thing and again, I just said ok and went and did it. The roles models were people who I thought did cool stuff. It’s very dangerous for us to say that girls can ONLY have female role models or that unless they don’t have them they will fail.
I feel like we’ve gone full circle with the sexism. Now girls are so fragile that if they don’t see themselves exactly represented they will vanish? They can’t look at a man’s work and think ‘that looks like a really interesting career, I’ll do that’ ? They can only read books and watch films that have female representation in? No ta I’ll enjoy a book for what it tells me whether that’s male or female driven plot. I do t care. It’s the same thing as people insisting that a boy who plays with dolls is actually a girl. This weird literalism. We’ve gone from ‘ boys can’t play with dolls to let kids play with whatever to if the boy plays with a doll he’s a girl chop his cock off.’ It’s barmy.
This is the man hate thread, not the "men and women are equally bad and every time someone says something mean about men I have to butt in to say that women are bad too thread". Thanks.Have you ever worked in a corporate environment? Men and women are awful as leaders in their own way. The ‘powerful’ women I’ve worked with were dreadful - petty, bitchy, snide, held grudges forever and worked to utterly destroy fellow female workers. The men express their awfulness with outright aggression, which is also bad, but if you think women high up in the corporate world are empathetic and effective leaders I’d like to know where you’re working so I can apply there. You don’t get high up the corporate tree without having your humanity removed, whether you’re male or female. I can count the number of ‘decent’ leaders I’ve encountered on one hand, and they’re split roughly fifty fifty. This is the same rubbish as ‘lady leaders dealt with Covid better’ to get people to simp for horrors like jacinda Arden
Moids especially those that spew manosphere/MRA/incel points will tell you how we live an anti-male and extremely misandrist world because women aren't obliged to entertain shitty manchildren with zero redeeming qualities such as them and kiss their ring for financial support anymore.You have women who have been abused and belittled by men their whole lives be like "not all men guys!!! The sexes should work together!!" while this is all it took for a scrote to hate ALL women.
If I knew faggots would've been so gross and obnoxious about tomboy women to the point they are calling them 13-year old boys to indulge in their "haha totally ironic until it's not ironic" pedophilic tendencies then I'd wish that tomboys and "weird" girls never got revived back to the normiesphere, because it's just gross porn addicts that are trying to pursue them.
>Women and young girls being kidnapped and trafficked into forced marriages and sexual slavery by men, because they refuse to participateChina has a problem with girls being kidnapped and a huge number of dissatisfied young men who could destabilise the government. Huge numbers of men dying in war leads to fewer men back home, more widows and families with no provider,
I'm not trying to come off as hostile or anything when I ask you this question. Why is this suddenly disingenuous to blame men for social issues, but when your A&H buddies blame issues on women and go "lol women and accountability/women will never take responsibility" that's fine and dandy in your book?This is disingenuous because any issue I raise you will sneer and say it’s just men being selfish idiots.
Sorry to moid up your thread again but women gang-raping us is a sure-fire way to address the grievances of the incels. Recommend castration and murder gangs instead.Women are vastly superior to men in every way, sorry not sorry. Maybe once women start gang-raping and murdering men we can start talking about "women bad too".