Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

It is funny how fast the average moid will claim whatever guy a woman ends up settling down with is a “beta.” The guys I see in real life that are in happy marriages would get classified as “beta” to these terminally online retards. A guy that actually shows affection and treats his wife to nice things isn’t “simping,” it’s how you keep a marriage intact. A guy that is willing to, and does some of the housework isn’t a “beta.” A guy that isn’t afraid to show sensitivity isn’t a “beta,” and a guy that is actually there for his kids is definitely not a “beta.” Being an emotionless muscle head that only knows how to smoke, shoot guns, and work a corporate job isn’t desirable to most women. Moids often mistake their own fantasies as reality, then get mad when they get shown time and time again that the guys they discount as “betas” are the ones actually getting married and having kids, not them.
Some of them have their head on straight, but the pretty ones like Greg never do. They’re too wrapped up in their own youth and beauty and whatever.
Why can't it just be child abuse is wrong? if you have to make it about hating the gays it seems like you care more about hating the gays than hating child abuse. And I don't mean this as a pro-gay statement.
The moids can’t take that stand because it would mean barely legal teen fuckery and step-parent incest are wrong, and these things really crank the hog for them.
 
up - it's that I've seen plenty of examples of paedophiles with boy victims who are otherwise in heterosexual adult relationships (e.g. with the mother) written off as gay when they're clearly not. Paedophiles are capable of adult relationships but choose to engage in paedophilia because they're attracted to vulnerability, degradation or the taboo and the most all three option is a child.
”Clearly not” is a bit of a reach when there is a guarantee they are only with the mother for access to the child.

The general idea you’re getting at and wording poorly isn’t necessarily wrong. Pedophilia isn’t a sexuality, a “born this way” thing people try to drive empathy around. It’s an attraction to a vast power dynamic that they can only achieve with children. It’s sadism. This is a common theory. At a certain point though, making a distinction between the attraction to children and the power dynamic loses value, because they become the same thing. There are pedos who pursue adult relationships with women, let’s say childless women to unmuddy the water, that will molest only boys, or both boys and girls.

That is still homosexual abuse that the majority of the gay community runs cover all the same because they are repulsive, it is acceptable in the mainstream to downplay the specifics of pedophilia and the increased normalisation in the gay community. It’s normalised generally, but more brazen in gay circles. Gay men that speak out about, who have been abused themselves, are attacked en masse—I just saw a QT’rt get 100k likes doing this very thing. This is a decades long argument. Soccer moms in the 20th century were protesting against groups like NAMBLA.
 
Last edited:
”Clearly not” is a bit of a reach when there is a guarantee they are only with the mother for access to the child.

The general idea you’re getting at and wording poorly isn’t necessarily wrong. Pedophilia isn’t a sexuality, a “born this way” thing people try to drive empathy around. It’s an attraction to a vast power dynamic that they can only achieve with children. It’s sadism. This is a common theory. At a certain point though, making a distinction between the attraction to children and the power dynamic loses value, because they become the same thing. There are pedos who pursue adult relationships with women, let’s say childless women to unmuddy the water, that will molest only boys, or both boys and girls. That is still homosexual abuse that the majority of the gay community runs cover all the same because they are repulsive.

Except that people who study it have found that many paedophiles aren't doing it just to get at the children; they genuinely participate in and are fulfilled sexually by the adult relationships, they just consider the children to be something they're entitled to on top of that. They're two separate things to the paedophile. It's why so many women will genuinely argue that the guy can't be a paedo because their relationship is real - it's because their relationship is real. The children are there to absorb his negative feelings acted out through molestation; the stuff about it being a genuine orientation with romantic feelings is total bullshit. If there is 'romance' it's ego-inflating ritual not real. Paedophiles score high in narcissistic traits.

It's not meaningless if you're actually engaged in working with or identifying paedophiles. It is a meaningless distinction if you're having an internet debate.
I'm genuinely not trying to get into a debate about it, as I've mentioned in thread that I've worked with past victims of child sexual abuse before and it's a subject that goads me pretty quickly, and ideally would for anybody else too. But literally my original complaint was that KFers on the whole are treating it as a meme because they do not really give a shit. Everyone stop going well what you're REALLY saying is.
 
they genuinely participate in and are fulfilled sexually by the adult relationships
I never refuted that and I agree with that statement broadly. There is not one reason why pedos do what they do, as we know not all were victims of CSA. The example you used earlier of the mother is just a shit one for trying to explain your point to people who don’t know. You’re being retarded now and almost uncomprehending of what I said.

Edit: I’m not treating it as a meme and genuinely give a shit, you’re being beyond bad faith now. Working with past victims doesn’t make you an authority, not everybody here is keen to power level. I said it loses value at a certain point, not that it was meaningless. Words matter.
 
Last edited:
Something I wanted to say in my previous post but I cut it out due it becoming really long is this:

I think the most comedic or depressing part, depending on how you view it, is the fact that the way Preggory really tried having his cake and eating it, isn't exactly once in a blue moon occurrence and we have seen this exactly scenario play over and over with particularly with male lolcows. You got:

Diddler Dax/Dick Masterson- A man that genuinely had a woman that was head over heels for him and wanted a family with him, only for him to keep dragging by the nose by promising her that and not actually meaning it, wasting her time and money so he can live as a wannabe rockstar while engaging in absolutely deviant behavior. This resulted in his girlfriend resenting him and she's only probably staying with him so she can see him at rock bottom as he's continually losing support due hanging out with pedophiles.

Mumkey Jones-A dude that had it all. He was the martyr icon for Youtubers that were against how the site was becoming more sterilized and an example of how this website decided to take everything he worked hard for, which gave him massive support from almost everybody. He was happily engaged with a woman loved him that put up with his manchild behavior and worked a decent steady job that was flexible enough to financially support Mumkey's endeavors. But he threw it all for a crumb of they/them bestiality loving pedophile pussy, even when his fiance was willing to forgive him he STILL choose the weird pooner over her, only for the pooner to dump him because she chose a 15-year old over him. He's now living in a trailer park while his ex out there having fun and thriving.

Balldo- I don't really need to say anything about Nick Rekieta. We all seen it.

Ethanol Ralph-He was given so many opportunities to reform and had Nora, an actual adult woman that loved him, stayed with him even when he was in prison and supported him through any means, only for him to again throw it all away for booze and pill popping, while trying to replicate and impress his e-daddies.

Richard Kyanka/Lowtax- A man that became rich from a thing that was considered impossible back in the day, had a nice marriage and a daughter until that marriage fell apart because he didn't take anything serious and didn't want to grow out of his edgy fedora tipping atheist persona despite his first wife stating how much her religion means to her. He was given another opportunity and was blessed with another daughter, only for him to throw everything to be with a obviously mentally unwell person who enabled his behavior and habits until she herself couldn't bear it. We all know it ended.

These guys come to my mind when I think about how many time this scenario happened, of course people will laugh at these moids completely throwing everything because of their impulsive behavior, but when you point out that this type behavior is super common even in non-lolcow men, they get upset about it, insist its NAWTTTTTTTT TRUUUUUUU and how somehow women in those relationships were responsible for the man's downwards spiral.

And of course, people will bring female lolcows who do this as counterpoint, which obviously they do exist. For an example Chantal dragging Peetz by the nose and giving him false crumbs of hope and idea they'll be together, which to that all I have to say:

>Feeling sorry for a lesbian fetishizing autogynephile that spends all his money on chunko pops
and porn commissions


1717438370181.png

It is funny how fast the average moid will claim whatever guy a woman ends up settling down with is a “beta.” The guys I see in real life that are in happy marriages would get classified as “beta” to these terminally online retards. A guy that actually shows affection and treats his wife to nice things isn’t “simping,” it’s how you keep a marriage intact. A guy that is willing to, and does some of the housework isn’t a “beta.” A guy that isn’t afraid to show sensitivity isn’t a “beta,” and a guy that is actually there for his kids is definitely not a “beta.” Being an emotionless muscle head that only knows how to smoke, shoot guns, and work a corporate job isn’t desirable to most women. Moids often mistake their own fantasies as reality, then get mad when they get shown time and time again that the guys they discount as “betas” are the ones actually getting married and having kids, not them.
The word "simp(ing)" has lost all it's meaning. It used to be a word reserved for really stupid guys who avoided red flags in very beautiful women or for men that were orbiting around women that show zero intentions for reciprocating these feelings, obviously there were women too that simped for men despite all the red flags. Note how it fully became a derogatory term for a guy, but when a woman simps they go in hoops justifying how it's okay because men want to be gushed and coo'd at because compliments for men are so rare these days or whatever.

It really reminds me how before the word "simp", there was the term "pussywhipped" and it was always derogatory one for a man, but there was never ever a such derogatory term to describe the opposite where the woman who's completely bend backwards for a man and lets him walk over her to the point she has no-self respect. Just food for thought.
Why do some men never consider that the age of the men also affects the child? Sperm quality do get worse when a men is in his 40s and there are higher chances of autism, miscarriage and other psychological problems.
Because they think men are genuinely sweet sugar buttercups that can't and dindu nuffin wrong.
If sexual abuse made you gay, way more women would be lesbians especially in conservative religious communities.
It's more likely for a woman that was sexually abused to completely lose interest in
sexual activities than become homosexual.
1717445395256.png
From here

There's also this research
 
Last edited:
I never refuted that and I agree with that statement broadly. There is not one reason why pedos do what they do, as we know not all were victims of CSA. The example you used earlier of the mother is just a shit one for trying to explain your point to people who don’t know. You’re being retarded now and almost uncomprehending of what I said.

Edit: I’m not treating it as a meme and genuinely give a shit, you’re being beyond bad faith now. Working with past victims doesn’t make you an authority, not everybody here is keen to power level. I said it loses value at a certain point, not that it was meaningless. Words matter.
I didn't say you said that. I said that that was what my point originally was but everyone kept jumping on it to be like well here's what I think about paedophilia and gay men. Which is what you did.

I'm not saying I'm an authority because I didn't even work there that long. But I'm not going to ignore a bunch of Well Actually jumping off of my original post either. Power level also doesn't mean sharing any personal information about yourself. You're supposed to do that if it's relevant. Power levelling is when you share personal information about yourself that is embarrassing.
 
For the love of god, shut the fuck up about fags. We've had this same argument like seven times, and no one wants to read your giant autistic essays about why fags are good/bad.

Just agree to disagree, and move on.
are the fags male? yes? then we hate them, because this is the manhate thread.

case closed, bring on the dancing lobsters!
 
For the love of god, shut the fuck up about fags. We've had this same argument like seven times, and no one wants to read your giant autistic essays about why fags are good/bad.
Personally, I don't like them because they're always mean as shit to me. Don't know about all the pedo and degeneracy chatter, but I don't like them so am fine with whoever wants to rant insanely about them being responsible for global warming or child slavery in Uganda.
 
I didn't say you said that. I said that that was what my point originally was but everyone kept jumping on it to be like well here's what I think about paedophilia and gay men. Which is what you did.

I'm not saying I'm an authority because I didn't even work there that long. But I'm not going to ignore a bunch of Well Actually jumping off of my original post either. Power level also doesn't mean sharing any personal information about yourself. You're supposed to do that if it's relevant. Power levelling is when you share personal information about yourself that is embarrassing.
You worded it poorly and left room for ambiguity which is why you got the replies you got. I tried to help you out. If you hate paedos we are all on the same page so whatever.
—————
I don’t know how to feel about all the European men losing their shit whenever Middle Eastern migrants rape some woman or children and get away with no prison time. Because on the one hand I’m glad people seem to be giving a shit, but it happens everyday with European men and none of the outrage goes there. Obviously the Afghans and the like get away with it due to race and culture, this is explicitly said in policies and judgement, but sentencing guidelines allow for it in the first place. And absolutely no one is campaigning on those grounds. Moids don’t condemn that at all, the posts get almost no traction.

And as an extra about the feminsist side of that, when it’s a big story about sentencing guidelines being even lower it gains some traction, but the lib fems are fucking NOWHERE except at free Palestine protests. I just hate this shit. Women always lose.
 
Last edited:
I know it's Salon, but men who don't have any expertise in female health need to shut the fuck up. They're now wanting to punish female college students for their reproductive choices. The A issue aside, anyone want to tell me why a business professor and a philosophy professor are talking obstetrics?
Screenshot_20240604-051758_(1).png
*Inhales*

Pregnancy isn't health neutral. It's not like baking a pie in an Easy Bake oven. I am BEGGING these men to learn what gestational diabetes is, and all the issues that come from pregnancy.

And, shocker - same judge in the mifepristone case.
Screenshot_20240604-052551_(1).png

Even Jessica Valenti thinks it's stupid.
 
Call me crazy, but something tells me they won't take such a dim view of the male students getting these women pregnant. How the fuck would they even know that someone had had an abortion in the first place?? It's actually frightening that these sub-humans are in charge of EDUCATING people.
 
I know it's Salon, but men who don't have any expertise in female health need to shut the fuck up. They're now wanting to punish female college students for their reproductive choices. The A issue aside, anyone want to tell me why a business professor and a philosophy professor are talking obstetrics?
View attachment 6052911
*Inhales*

Pregnancy isn't health neutral. It's not like baking a pie in an Easy Bake oven. I am BEGGING these men to learn what gestational diabetes is, and all the issues that come from pregnancy.

And, shocker - same judge in the mifepristone case.
View attachment 6052912

Even Jessica Valenti thinks it's stupid.
I honestly wouldn't mind anti-abortion opinions if people also had solutions for the kids once they get here. It's very odd that the people against abortion want (in their opinion) irresponsible mothers to raise the next generation. Like say you're pro-life. Your solution is to have a would-be murderer to raise the baby she planned to shoot into the vacuum of space. Why? I'm just saying it doesn't make any sense.

I'm mostly just pro-choice myself specifically because I think it's better to get rid of the problem since no one has anyway to solve it beyond that. Adoption system is bogged down (with most kids ending up traumatized or molested), most people would make terrible parents even if they did keep their kids, etc.
 
Back