>Muh sex revolution le bad
What conservative scrotes fail to understand that the sexual revolution managed to take place
was because men in 50s-60 were getting tired of rigid dating scene, its rules and having to
work to gain access to women by appeasing their father and other male authority figures in
that woman's life.
They were regretting of having a wife and children, and not being able to just go out and bang women they found appealing, that's why by the mid to late 60s as societal and sexual mores were changing, there were more men given the license to screw around and buzz off, leaving women to be burdened with possible outcomes of that relationship aka children.
I find very interesting how when moids cry about how sexual revolution and its conquences destroying society and western values, they don't talk about that part or the part of sexual revolution was the normalization of porn magazines and videos made by MALE pornographers, how they conditioned men to think if women opposed to them consuming that it means they are fun-hating prudes that want to pussywhip you. They only talk about how sexual revolution is bad because it allowed women to be able to do things on their own terms and be with who they want to be instead of being used as a bargaining chip by their fathers.
If anything, the fact that women, even after 50-60 years of influence from the pornographic industry and other scrote-controlled establishments, still are not even close to being on the same level as men in terms of sexuality should speak volumes.
The majority of porn consumers and pornographers are still predominantly male and so are punters. There still isn't a massive number of women cucking their husbands by riding the black cock carousel except in pornography which, again, is mainly made by men for other men. Bestiality is still overwhelmingly a male paraphilia despite the existence of the meme "white women fuck dogs". Hook up culture was promoted by liberal feminists and the likes for a while, but it has now started receiving backlash because more and more women realize that it mostly benefits men (whereas there appears to be an unsurprising lack of reflection on the part of men regarding the role that they play in hook up culture). Stuff like Onlyfans has become more popular over the years and the "creators" are mainly female, but the demand is almost exclusively driven by, wait for it, men, and the top pimp Leonid Radvinsky is also male. Obviously men also still make up the absolute majority of sex offenders.
Moids who seethe about how female sexuality has had disastrous consequences for the human race whenever a Greek statue account posts an "OnlyFans girl L" tweet are ignoring the big fat elephant in the room which is male sexuality and the fact that without it, the developments that have been taking place over the past five-six decades would not have occurred. The sex industry and its influence would be but a fragment of what they are today. We would not be having a problem with girls being groomed into opening an OnlyFans account on their 18th birthday because the demand for it would not exist in the first place. Even before the sexual revolution, when there were more restrictions on what was sexually acceptable, moids had more sexual freedom than women and the sex trade was overwhelmingly driven by male demand (back then, they were more honest about what the purpose of prostitution was – it was explicitly said to be for the sake of men, not "female empowerment").
Until conservative scrotes and other men with a similar mindset stop pretending that women having extramarital sex is the main problem and start discussing the actual crux of the problem, that is, male sexuality, they will never truly be able to do something about the "sexual revolution and its consequences that have destroyed society and western values" (which obviously they won't discuss, because it would require some self-reflection on their part and also, women bad).
"
DUMP YOUR PORN ADDICTED BOYFRIENDS 
