Due to the whole federation thing, every instance is infested - it's the nature of the beast. I wouldn't be so worried about troons anyway because they'll defederate you first, lolicons on the other hand...
Just avoid software that can't be forked. You see it with x11/xlibre. The x11 people were hellbent on killing x11 off, pushed things too far so somebody ended up forking it and I have the feeling that fork will live for a long time and eventually replace the original x11 for all intents and purposes. Would x11 be proprietary or run under a no-derivative license you'd be left with no options and would be completely exposed to the whims and moods of the developers. This is bad and something free (as in freedom) software avoids.
There are the Christians instances like FreeAtlantis, although you wouldn't be able to call anyone a faggot or nigger on there.
It's only going to keep getting worse. Woke is killing Linux in ways Microsoft wishes it could have.
That's just CEO propaganda. The law only requires that they act in the best interests of the company. The problem is that their bonuses are tied to short-term profit, so that's what they pursue. The sycophantic press, entirely dependent on revenue from ad purchases, cover for this and act like it's a legal obligation and not self-interest. The universities also cover for them, since it's their business schools that teach this kind of MBA thinking, and they are rewarded for this with generous tax-deductible donations from these esteemed alumni.
Maximizing profit is, according to the judgement in an investor lawsuit decades ago, part of corporate leadership's fiduciary duty. It IS a legal obligation in the United States of America thanks to court precedent set in the suit.
They already are. Redditors and FAANG social media dwellers are niggercattle chaff devoid of higher order thought, content to ruminate on their latest mouthful of goy feed.
They expect apologies and asspats, of course. He's in the same camp of retards as Graphene Dan or Hector Martin that are utterly unable to take criticism without having a shit fit.
Eh? I wouldn't say the issue is 'woke' itself. Pinning the blame on trainnies alone is missing the forest for the trees. The real enemy of FOSS is corporate ingress from Red Hat et al. that attempt to consolidate power by way of spreading the CoC culture into places it has no business being in, and centralizing 99% of Linux under a single umbrella that their little Black Pete niggerboy Poettering holds the handle to, in this case, systemd. I would much rather break bread with faggots like the people at antiX so long as they remain anti corporate. Profit-driven corporations will ALWAYS without exception seek to control, centralize, then squeeze revenue from any project they get their hands on. Trannies are a symptom, not the disease.
The real enemy of Open Sores is its own adherents. It originated from entitled marxists and is controlled by entitled marxists. This infighting and collapse of the "movement" is inevitable in ANY marxist community.
I think what confuses me the most about this whole thing is the fact that, up until that commit, he did go as far as to include his own PKGBUILD in the repo for Duckstation, but he continued to get complaints from people using "broken AUR packages" to this day instead of his own. Okay... why the fuck were people still using broken packages instead of his then? Did he just not make it clear enough to people that his own package was meant to work?
This is just a fucking baffling lack of foresight here. It would be one thing if you said from the start "I don't use Linux, I don't know how it works and I frankly don't care, I can't support it". Fine, nothing anyone else could do about that then other than try to somehow make it work under WINE instead. But to go all this time until now still—pretty much blindly—providing support for an OS you admit to not using or knowing much about, going as far as to add in all of those hacks for
It's fragility of the self. Most open-sour project maintainers and owners of the likes of dan or marcan do it because they want it on their resume and are very sensitive to any naysaying as if they're on the gallows.
There is no way he could possibly know what the demographics of his userbase are, except that they are about 90% male and 10% male (but identify as women), and the number he chose doesn't even seem to be derived from anything other than the Jewish population of the USA (what did he mean by this). Linux marketshare is about 5%, and there is a greater proportion of the Linux userbase that uses their computers for anything other than web browsing and document writing. Linux users are generally less known for gaming than Windows, but surely there must be some reason why nearly every emulator is available for Linux. Also, the Steam numbers are of course completely meaningless for this, since people who play Steam and people who play retro games are not generally the same people.
Is this a trait of GPL-licensed project developers everywhere or just in your space?
I find that utterly impossible to believe. Open Sores devs and supporters I have encountered in my life have been the most insufferable idiots on earth, second only to the "Trans Rights" crowd. They parrot total bullshit talking points, spew idiotic slogans and deny reality when it conflicts with what their cult leaders have declared, and call everyone else sheep for wanting reliable, properly-supported software and products.
+1, MPL is probably the best copyleft license you can use right now. Despite people calling it the "cuck license", I think BSD is also good in this regard as it has a much lesser tendency towards attracting narcissists who see every line of code they write as their golden goose. While it does give cart blanche to corporations to use the code as they see fit (read: MINIX becoming a backdoor OS nestled into every single Intel chipset since 2006), it comes with the benefit of having less spergs in-house.
The BSD license is great just for the fact that Stallman abhors the clause that requires acknowledging the original creator of a piece of BSD-licensed software in all forks.
Casting wide nets on all license users would be very disingenuous of me. The intents and philosophies behind why X project is licensed with Y depend on many factors. Most of the time, though, they're done out of spite for the other party - for example, a component being relicensed to AGPL to specifically thwart proprietary commercial use by someone the owner didn't like and doesn't want using it, ironically causing said component to be unusable by other people who want to stick to permissive licenses like MIT.
+2 MPL.
The Wayland side of Linux is interminably mingled with trannyfaggots, but, presuming Wayland survives, KDE Wayland and Hyprland will probably continue to exist, but GNOME's days are numbered, even if only due to financials. The X11/XLibre side looks like it has a bright future, and the renewal of X11 could revitalize BSD. The Linux kernel isn't going anywhere because its continued development is crucial for several megacorporations (and the same can be said about BSD). As a wildcard, Haiku could potentially become a serious contender in the market, although that's a long shot.
Why swim upstream? Nothing else has enough support to be worth a shit.
I really can't believe you are forgetting about the best esoteric software license out there, the +NIGGER license.
