Missed the point. It's obvious that from that person's perspective, unless you're an autistic retard, that they see Palworld as stepping on toes, and that wanting Palworld to win here is an attack of some kind against the thing that made it what it is to begin with.
Whether that's actually true or not doesn't matter. The sentiment isn't wrong, just the perspective. The overall message is not "Westerners want to have fun and they shouldn't do that", it's "Westerners run roughshod over game companies if they see anything as an obstacle to their game time" and it's not that hard to agree with that most of the time. I'm watching two retarded sides do that right now. Erasing that from their statement makes them look like their motivation is purely pogeyman fanboyism when it's not just that.
You can, however, disagree with is the idea that Palworld doing the funny pokeyball fps is relevant to that. I don't think any of us here wouldn't.