- Joined
- Jun 10, 2021
I’m curious if Gamefreak will now go through this route of Pokémon games in the future, and what sort of improvements, features, and the like will be added.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only time will tell.I’m curious if Gamefreak will now go through this route of Pokémon games in the future, and what sort of improvements, features, and the like will be added.
And if history is any indication...Only time will tell.
Yes I can because the games themselves are meant to be a separate primary source of Pokemon media and are reviewed as such. The audience knows the staunch difference between the Pokemon you see on the anime and the Pokemon you capture in the games. The average player can and should be able to make their starter's distinct from the anime. If what you're saying about the anime is true, then the starters in the game are worse off for having an indisputable singular personality directly tied to the anime, instead of objective creative freedom given to you by the game.You can't act like how a pokemon is presented in other media won't affect how it's received in game. Most people will come to play pokemon because they saw some somewhere and want to use them. Therefore, the personalities starters are presented with in other media have a huge effect on their reception in the games. You can't talk about them in a bubble.
I never said that. You are putting words into my mouth. You have already interpreted my own argument down to two sentences, yet neither me or you mention that the starters are meant to represent the region as a whole. Your false counterargument and examples does not work here when its counters a strawman that never existed.Firstly, I challenge your premise. Pokemon are literally all shapes and sizes, from sentient blobs to humanoid, and starters have never been a grand indicator of the variety or monstrous possibilities you proclaim they are.
Snivy's "Smugleaf personality" may be a creative extrapolation of a single teaser image back from the 4chan image boards, but that type of anthropomorphism is nowhere within the games themselves, you've proved my point. The less distinct the personality a starter pokemon has, the more freedom of creative expression there is within.Secondly, I challenge your premise that pokemon with less defined personalities will make for better starters. I distinctly remember gravitating to some starters specifically because of clear-cut personality - hell, there were whole memes aboutSmugleafSnivy's personality, and I personally gravitated to it for that. These characteristics don't make them blank slates, but depending on the person, they can be the seed from which ideas grow about their nuances of their personality, or the personality they're embedded with might be naturally attractive regardless.
Because none of these examples have nearly as much anthropomorphic traits as the Pokemon starters from the 3DS era and beyond. The gen IV and V starters references ancient history and mythology, not a career, or a human profession. Blaziken's hakama-like leg feathers isn't nearly as egregious as Delphox's wizard wand, Primarina's jewelry, or Rillaboom's drumkit. Blaziken's fighter-based personally is hardly conspicuous when every single Pokemon battles in the games.(On a related note, I find your drawn line of Gen 6 very dodgy, and not acknowledging the careers and personality expressed in at least Empoleon, Infernape, Blaziken and all the Gen 5 starters.
My previous sentence was persuasive hyperbole but I've made clear within said statement that, as you've eloquently put it:Putting aside that your final word in the first one talks about which Pokemon are most beloved, yet you never explain how you determined that...
I cannot make this any more clearer, the objectively better Starters are the ones less anthropomorphic, and therefore more easily creatively malleable by the player. That standard of measurement seems universally fair IMHO.Trying to argue that one set is "objectively" better designed is stupid, and you should know better. You have a standard by which you're measuring, but it's a completely arbitrary one that isn't really based in anything other than your perception of what kids will respond to best - which you haven't evidenced.
There are only EIGHT trios of starter evolution lines to sort out dude, It ain't as impossible as you make it out to be. The less athro, the better. Simple as.As for the rest of the paragraph, that is my point you dumb of fuck. You are trying to apply an objective veneer to an incredibly subjective topic, one that is heavily influenced by dozens of factors external to the character design itself. Which is why, to me, the standards you are measuring don't stand up to scrutiny. You're applying them after the fact, trying to apply a simple yardstick to an inherently subjective and infinitely corrupted topic.
My point is not that these starters are as good as the classics. My point is that trying to act like there's some single objective measure of what makes a good starter is ridiculous, and this is where the shaky parts of your argument come from.
The Time Travel Triad
You need to use Lightning Strike or Hatchet Man depending on who you have in the party and knock the metal slime down before it can run. Oh wait that's Dragon Quest, the series that Pokemon ripped off. OHHHH SHIT!!! HOW WILL THEY EVER RECOVER!? STOMACHS FULL OF BUTTERFREE! HEADS FULL OF SLOWBRO!PS: How do I battle the Pokémon that run away on turn 1? I can't battle Starlies because they keep buggering off!
Sneak up behind them and pop them in the back of the head with the Pokeball of the Pokémon you want to fight them. It’ll stun them for a turn or two.PS: How do I battle the Pokémon that run away on turn 1? I can't battle Starlies because they keep buggering off!
I've not done either of those yet. I found some of my favourite Pokémon in the beach level so I had to train them up for a while.Also saw my first “Pokémon up a tree” thing. A Psyduck in the forest jumped up into a tree to sleep and I caught him.
Also ran into my first “Pokémon swarm” led by an alpha. That was nuts.
hopefully they do, because i cant imagine people will be too keen on returning to the super stale cookie cutter formula we had before, especailly since this game introduces so many changes that people adoreI’m curious if Gamefreak will now go through this route of Pokémon games in the future, and what sort of improvements, features, and the like will be added.
Mega evolutions and changes along those lines were token attempts and never good.then again, gamefreak took away megas when people loved those so i wouldnt be shocked if they went back to the same boring shit after this for no reason
Well, it certainly sped up the already stale gameplay by wiping out the NPCs and the Elite Four.Mega evolutions and changes along those lines were token attempts and never good.
It's different from Go, but it's mostly you walking around in an open field to catch some mons. Sure, there's an handful of people to fight, but it's mostly you touching grass.Is Legends any good? It looks great but I want to check into it more without spoilers before I buy. It isn’t another GO game is it?
It isn't GO and it is definitely different from the former games. Other users in this thread enjoy playing the game if that means anything to you.Is Legends any good? It looks great but I want to check into it more without spoilers before I buy. It isn’t another GO game is it?
I remember hearing about some Fire Red mod that has Pokemon evolve into bigger versions of themselves. You could also make your own mod that does the same thing, with one of the many rom editors.Hey so here's another one.
I sort of kind of wish it were possible to use basic form or first form Pokemon and have them be useful. There has got to be some sort of way to make that work. Ash never evolved his Pikachu. Pikachu refused to take the thunder stone if I remember correctly. I like some of the earlier forms better than the evolved forms. How do we get more utility out of some of these?
Is it as simple as having stats boost significantly more when these forms hit very high levels? In that case you would at least have to do some work to run a sick nasty Dragonair or a Charmeleon. Should certain moves be form-specific? I dunno. But I want to be competitive with a kawaii Oddish like Ash Ketchum. And I don't want to fuck with the autistic busywork shit that is EV training.
It's more of the same. If you like Pokemon games you will probably enjoy it a lot. The gameplay is about the same as always which is to say it is addicting. You might notice some hiccups as the game is running with some new features that haven't been in this series before. But overall you'll probably enjoy it and have fun. I think you should give it a try. If you're really concerned you should be able to find some gameplay videos with minimal spoilers if you tweak your search parameters.Is Legends any good? It looks great but I want to check into it more without spoilers before I buy. It isn’t another GO game is it?