r/polyamory

[Francis Dollarhyde]

What if a woman had that arrangement with two men who are identical twins and had identical twins from one of them and then got the two adult twins to raise the baby twins? How that be cuckholdery?

Depends on who the judge puts on child support.
If both, then one is getting kind a cucked but since nobody knows for certain it does not count I guess plus the mother gets double the money. So if you can get 2 twins to bone you, go for it for extra cash, if you are poly anyway you got a good excuse.
If just one because the judge relies on the testimony of a very unreliable witness, someone is a cuckoldess without even trying but then who is cucked?

Update from my previous post:
View attachment 928225

Fucking free love hippies and their bullshit.

 

[Cryonic Haunted Bullets]

 

[totse]

Honorable mention to relationship_advice, aka breakup_advice or relationship_postmortem

 

[sweet-cereal-killer]

@Cryonic Haunted Bullets How do you get that graph?

 

[Comfyman]

View attachment 928422

Is the similarity score based on overlapping user bases?

 

[Cryonic Haunted Bullets]

@Cryonic Haunted Bullets How do you get that graph?

Is the similarity score based on overlapping user bases?

Interactive Map of Reddit and Subreddit Similarity Calculator

Reddit is the [8th most visited site](http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/US" target="_blank) in the US and allows users to submit, comment, and vote on links. The site is divided into tens of thousands of communities, called subreddits, which are each focused on topics both

www.shorttails.io

Reddit Subreddit Similarity and Algebra

The core principle is "guilt by association" - if the same user comments in two subreddits they are likely to be linked in interest. So, each subreddit can be represented by a mathematical vector that summarizes how often users commented in that subreddit and also each of the other subreddits.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

Oh, gosh, the subsequent pages are even better. You've got everything in there at the .5 or higher similarity mark. r/BPD. r/Wicca. r/Divorce. r/rapecounseling. r/Fibromyalgia. r/autism. r/SexWorkers. r/crochet. It's every poly stereotype at once.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

My almonds are activating hard upon seeing this news.

 

[Captain Hastings Official]

r/Fibromyalgia

Just imagine how many polyamorous munchies there must be to give this result. Simply amazing.

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Just imagine how many polyamorous munchies there must be to give this result. Simply amazing.

It seems like almost every poly I run into online or otherwise has the old "fibro." The only thing that surprises me about all of this is that some of them have the self-awareness to actually know they have borderline personality disorder.

 

[Vampirella]

r/rapecounseling.

I don't want to know why this is connected to poly. The best thing I can think of is going poly is a response to trauma, and that makes me sad.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

I don't want to know why this is connected to poly. The best thing I can think of is going poly is a response to trauma, and that makes me sad.

Environments that allow arrogant men to do whatever they want without consequence will have higher rates of sexual assault. This is especially true in alternative sexual environments where the percentage of men who don't understand social rules is significantly higher than normal.

Here's a very good post: http://archive.fo/kyLNV. The title is 'Time to Put Ethics into 'Ethical' Non-Monogamy: Polyamory Shouldn't be an Excuse for Narcissistic Behavior--or Libertarian/Objectionistic Politics'. The overarching theme is a complaint against what we see here all the time: polyamorists not caring about anyone else's feelings and thinking this is morally acceptable.

One of the comments and its subsequent mini-thread is predictable:

(I had to stitch these together because my screen isn't big enough to get the whole thing, but the final comment was nested directly under the penultimate comment.)

She posts more further down the thread and gets a similar but equally dismissive response from other polys. (It's a long comment chain, which is why I'm not posting more screenshots). There's another sad normie married to a poly too.

One person writes:

Poly communities seem to be a candy store for particularly disordered personalities.

You don't say!

 

[AprilRains]

Here's a very good post: http://archive.fo/kyLNV. The title is 'Time to Put Ethics into 'Ethical' Non-Monogamy: Polyamory Shouldn't be an Excuse for Narcissistic Behavior--or Libertarian/Objectionistic Politics'.

The post is mostly all right. The attempt to connect it to libertarian politics is mostly wrong. The poly community is full of people who abhor libertarianism, many of them self-identified socialists, who behave more like the author's stereotype of an objectivist than any objectivist could. This requires cognitive dissonance on the order of an MLP-hating CWC fan, but if anyone can manage that kind of idiocy, they can.

 

[DelicateMageflower]

I hope this isn't PL since it's relevant to the topic at hand.

Years ago, I went to a NYE party . My bf at the time pointed out three people, two dudes and a woman, and told me they were polyamorous. They looked pretty much how you expect; one of the dudes even had a fedora on.

The entire night the woman and one of the men made out and were grinding on each other, completely ignoring the third dude, who was sitting on the sofa, glumly nursing a beer and looking like he wanted to off himself at the nearest available opportunity. Didn't even get a kiss at midnight.

Kinda when I realized poly people were inherently selfish and fucked in the head.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

The post is mostly all right. The attempt to connect it to libertarian politics is mostly wrong. The poly community is full of people who abhor libertarianism, many of them self-identified socialists, who behave more like the author's stereotype of an objectivist than any objectivist could. This requires cognitive dissonance on the order of an MLP-hating CWC fan, but if anyone can manage that kind of idiocy, they can.

There are poly libertarians, though.
This is something that always comes up in discussions of these sorts of behaviors. 'Nobody in MY community is a freak! It's all those other losers over there!' The truth is that if you like something non-normative, there will be polyamorists, kinksters, furries, troons, and other weirdos afoot. The only exception is religion, and even then you can't be sure (I've seen plenty of trad wife posts straying uncomfortably into fetish territory).

 

[BubbleButt]

There are poly libertarians, though.
This is something that always comes up in discussions of these sorts of behaviors. 'Nobody in MY community is a freak! It's all those other losers over there!' The truth is that if you like something non-normative, there will be polyamorists, kinksters, furries, troons, and other weirdos afoot.

The main thing I've taken to heart in my time coming to this shithole website it's this: Kill the double standards, even people you like are stupid and fucked up.

 

[sweet-cereal-killer]

r/polyamory - TIL that the meaning behind “ménage à trois” is actually quite wholesome; it refers to a “household of three” and not the sexual act of a threesome.

616 votes and 31 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

TIL that the meaning behind “ménage à trois” is actually quite wholesome; it refers to a “household of three” and not the sexual act of a threesome.

Speaking of weird poly-fuck logic...

...what?

EDIT: No actually it does make some "sense" but I still find it odd

 

[sweet-cereal-killer]

There are poly libertarians, though.
This is something that always comes up in discussions of these sorts of behaviors. 'Nobody in MY community is a freak! It's all those other losers over there!' The truth is that if you like something non-normative, there will be polyamorists, kinksters, furries, troons, and other weirdos afoot. The only exception is religion, and even then you can't be sure (I've seen plenty of trad wife posts straying uncomfortably into fetish territory).

Religious belief is as Oedipal to its very core as kink is.

 

[AprilRains]

There are poly libertarians, though.
This is something that always comes up in discussions of these sorts of behaviors. 'Nobody in MY community is a freak! It's all those other losers over there!' The truth is that if you like something non-normative, there will be polyamorists, kinksters, furries, troons, and other weirdos afoot. The only exception is religion, and even then you can't be sure (I've seen plenty of trad wife posts straying uncomfortably into fetish territory).

See, that's the correlation I'd draw. My sample of poly people probably skewed left because the majority of the ones I met were in New England.

But it's not about libertarianism or socialism or anything political. It's about being such a narcissist that you think you're qualified to reinvent the world as a whole, and that your ideas have more force than the facts. And that conviction can survive an astonishing amount of contrary evidence.

 

[Urban Superstition]

View attachment 927844

These morons really think their vision of polyamory is the same as a member of royalty owning multiple women? This is a false equivalence at best (thinking that kings actually loved their concubines instead of viewing them as pretty, fuckable ornaments), and horribly narcissistic at worst (comparing polyamorists to kings partaking in kingly activities), but completely shallow in both interpretations. Kings did not own concubines because they loved more than one person, they owned concubines because they were so wealthy that they could afford to indulge in their lust (which it was: lust, not love, and they almost always never had the same rights the real wife had). Polygamy had been largely practiced by the rich, not by peasants.