Containment Random Thoughts & Questions

Chris selling soaked boxes for easily twice what they were originally is what I'd expect, but a violin that looks to be in decent shape? (I'm sure he's never played it, and it doesn't necessarily need to be "restrung", it just needs to be tightened--and is that violin still intact or did it get swallowed by the Horde and burnt?)
Dat bow!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mogambo
HAIL SATAN
 

Attachments

  • cwc.png
    cwc.png
    20.3 KB · Views: 169

I don't even play violin any more than that hurts to look at. Someone abused the living shit out of that poor bow. Even if it was made in Korea it didn't deserve that.

He doesn't even attempt to photograph anything inside the violin that would prove it's what he claims. I'm not familiar with the name, and maybe it's the bad lighting, but that finish looks pretty cheap. If the bow came with it, I'm guessing Bob might have picked this up in military service thinking it was worth something, or just because. It looks a little banged up. I see the same name going on eBay for up to $350, but those ones look in much better shape and don't have that ugly shiny finish on them.
 
At least he's not selling porn this time.

Chris said:
A copy of Antonius Stradiuarius Faciebat Anno 1721 Violin (or Fiddle), complete with case, bow and rosin. The bow needs to be restrung. The violin is in great condition; it and its case are clean. The rosin has a few cracks on it.
Is it a violin, or fiddle? Make up your mind. It comes complete with "rosin"? The violin is in great condition(whatever that means) but it "has a few cracks on it"?
Chris said:
Buy It Now for 300 plus Shipping, and I will have the bow restrung. It will take a while longer, but I promise to keep you up-to-date with the progress.
So what you're saying is, I have to pay the full, inflated price up front, then supposedly you'll have the bow restrung, and you're not sure how long that will take, and then you'll eventually send the violin to me, sometime? Sounds like fraud to me. Nah, Chris would never scam somebody out of their money or be dishonest. After all, look at his history and you can tell that right away.
Chris said:
And it will all be shipped in its case, in a box.
Nice to know you're going to ship it in a box Chris, I would have never guessed that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it a violin, or fiddle? Make up your mind. It comes complete with "rosin"? The violin is in great condition(whatever that means) but it "has a few cracks on it"?
.

He said it was the rosin which had a few cracks in it. Rosin is a substance you apply to a violin bow. It usually comes in a small puck which you rub your bow on before you play.

I will give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he was saying the $5 rosin cake was cracked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
So I was thinking about the time paintingatree accused The Dude of making up his wife. It is bizarre accusation because making up a wife is such a bizarre thing to do. The rest of us don't give The Dude any more or less respect because he is married.

So why does Chris? Except that he is a bizarre weirdo.

Suppose I claimed to be a billionaire, or have graduated Magna cum Laude from Harvard (note: I claim neither of those). Many of you might be skeptical, because you tried in school or tried to make as much money as possible and didn't come that close to those levels. You know that they are really hard to do, and are the sort of thing someone might claim to get more respect/attention. If some random chump on the internet claims it you do not buy it without proof. If I pissed you off, you might call me out on it and tell me my claim to be a billionaire was bullshit.

For Chris, being married is similar. He has focused so much of his time and attention on getting there for a decade, but hasn't come close. How could some chump on the internet have succeeded when he tried so hard and failed?

Not the most insightful post, I know, but the thought intrigued me a little, so I thought I would share it.
You raise a very valid point; I was only asking because of Chris's track record of lying (e.g. "My duck grew and is no longer bent"). The CWCki isn't clear about how much truth there is to some facts. It doesn't explicitly state that Chris got a hold of a hooker, but I feel like while I was reading it that whoever wrote the page was probably leaning towards believing it as fact. It's when I see things like a poorly photoshopped image of Bob in Klansmen garb that have lead me to believe that perhaps it's time the CWCki is due for a cleanup. I'm not saying get rid of anything bad about him, but maybe edit some of the weenery. For example, on the "homos" page, twisting the "phallic Lego tower" photo into evidence for that is a bit weeny and could stand to be removed. Stating Chris wears a bra, then back pedaling to say that he uses it to attract women is sketchy evidence at best. Bringing up things that came straight from the horse's mouth and have citations should stay. Do you see where I'm going with this? We aren't looking to troll Chris anymore, but I think there are things that can be edited out because while it may have been good for getting him to tard rage, some of these jokes have probably gone stale by now.

Yeah, that the cwckiforum people are normal people, and not the cliche's Chris is imagining, bothers him. He might have to accept that doesn't have anything up on the trolls, and that really bothers him.

I'd really love to tweak Chris with this fact, it'd be lots of fun.
Chris: Yew lyin' LULZy creeps! Ahwl ub da TROLLS are DANG DERTY HOMOs! Ebrywun knows dat! I AM STRAIGHT! An' don't yew furgit et!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin
You raise a very valid point; I was only asking because of Chris's track record of lying (e.g. "My duck grew and is no longer bent"). The CWCki isn't clear about how much truth there is to some facts. It doesn't explicitly state that Chris got a hold of a hooker, but I feel like while I was reading it that whoever wrote the page was probably leaned towards believing it as fact.
Eh, Chris doesn't setup elaborate lies. But yeah, nah, Chris hired a hooker and had sex.

It's when I see things like a poorly photoshopped image of Bob in Klansmen garb that have lead me to believe that perhaps it's time the CWCki is due for a cleanup. I'm not saying get rid of anything bad about him, but maybe edit some of the weenery. For example, on the "homos" page, twisting the "phallic Lego tower" photo into evidence for that is a bit weeny and could stand to be removed. Stating Chris wears a bra, then back pedaling to say that he uses it to attract women is sketchy evidence at best. Bringing up things that came straight from the horse's mouth and have citations should stay. Do you see where I'm going with this? We aren't looking to troll Chris anymore, but I think there are things that can be edited out because while it may have been good for getting him to tard rage, some of these jokes have probably gone stale by now.
Yeah, there's lots of iffy inferences and old jokes that people have made and stuff.
 
Does Chris not have a PS4 due to his recent money issues? Or is he just content with the PS3?

It's when I see things like a poorly photoshopped image of Bob in Klansmen garb that have lead me to believe that perhaps it's time the CWCki is due for a cleanup. I'm not saying get rid of anything bad about him, but maybe edit some of the weenery. For example, on the "homos" page, twisting the "phallic Lego tower" photo into evidence for that is a bit weeny and could stand to be removed. Stating Chris wears a bra, then back pedaling to say that he uses it to attract women is sketchy evidence at best. Bringing up things that came straight from the horse's mouth and have citations should stay. Do you see where I'm going with this? We aren't looking to troll Chris anymore, but I think there are things that can be edited out because while it may have been good for getting him to tard rage, some of these jokes have probably gone stale by now.
I agree. Champ actually brought up this issue in another thread: Have you actually gone to the source material?

Interesting, looks like someone might be scamming Chris? http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISA...rid=jesusguidesme2&ftab=FeedbackLeftForOthers

More likely: Chris forgot to change his eBay account's shipping address from 14 B.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Anonimo
I've always wondered where the name Ian Brandon Anderson came from. I know it spawned from the IBAChandler YouTube account, but was it perhaps a reference to Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull? (Who is probably the polar opposite of Chris)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TrippinKahlua
I just figured that it was just a made up name based off the letters IBA, and that the Ian Brandon part was something the Chris made up when he was being all "IAN BRANDON SOMETHING" and just pulled random names out of thin air, but couldn't come up with a name for the "A" initial because of his tard rage. Then the trolls took the "Ian Brandon" part added the "Anderson" part and rolled with it, but I've been wrong before, so please correct me if you can.

Though personally, I thought Ian Brandon Anderson had a certain ring to it. Sounded like it had a less high and mighty feel to it as Christian Weston Chandler...especially the Christian part... if only because it reminds me of his being smug about being an "empathetic Christian" and not a dirty JEW or and his rather simplistic hostility towards atheism. And of course there was the whole thing with "God and the Bear" that led him to change his name. Interestingly, my initials also follow a similar pattern to Chris's: Start with a consonant for the first name, use a different consonant for the middle("M" for "mini", not "W" for "wumbo" surprisingly enough) , and then repeat the first consonant. Yeesh, what is it with some autistic people and our naming schemes :lol:
 
Last edited:
I know that it came straight from the horse's mouth, but was there any proof that Chris even managed to get a hold of a hooker?

I agree. Call me a skeptic, but I doubt Chris actually hired a prostitute. All we have is Chris' word, and he isn't exactly a bastion of honesty. If nothing else, he strikes me as too much of a pussy to actually go through with it all. More likely, he's still a virgin with (impotent) rage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anonimo
Nah, its not even that. Its more that I've learned to be somewhat skeptical by nature. Especially of unsourced claims on the internet. That and I do tend to set my expectations for OPL kinda low, for obvious reasons. If anything, I want to be more sympathetic towards him, though some of his behaviours make that rather difficult at times.
 
Back