Off-Topic Random Trans Thoughts, Musings, and Questions - For all your armchair psych and general sperging

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Stan said:
I know I got into trouble doing this before with a (((certain photo))) but the easiest way for real women to mog trannies is to remind them that you just roll out of bed looking like this, butchmaxxing your way to social recognition of your genuine femininity and female sex. E.g. "oh, my eyebrows? No, I don't pluck or trim them. My legs? I don't shave those in winter. Hairstyle? I just put it up in a low pony and get on with my day. Or a braid if I'm feeling fancy? So long as I shower it's fine. Makeup just looks weird on me."
Reminding them that you're born with it and can even neglect it and still be women when they are still men makes them MAD.
Click to expand...
I don't get how you can look at some of the thread subjects in this subforum and think that you need to flex on them.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Misogenes, Aunt Carol, CuntessMaximus and 6 others
Bloo said:
Why do so many of them use the word “folks”? I know it’s a gender neutral term but so is “people” They specifically love the word “folks”
Click to expand...
Perhaps it's due to Twitter's old character limit. Sure it's only two fewer letters, but those two freed up characters could come in handy.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Aunt Carol, Stan, AFAB and 1 other person
I have a sperg that I stopped lurking and registered to post. I get an itch from time to time, forgive me.

I see a lot of the language around this, like "transphobia" and "hatespeech", with the complaint being about how hateful the world is to trannies.
But what I personally feel, is not hate, but contempt.

Hate would be something born in part by a fear or pain, and that might demand some kind of "respect for the enemy".
But I have no respect, fear or pain regarding these people, yet I dislike them.
it's not hate that they inspire but contempt, and that is closer to pity than it is to fear or pain.

I see a tranny out in the wild and to me it's like looking at a dog ravaged by parasites or seeing a leper. It's disgusting, diseased. The difference being, that a dog ravaged by parasites or lepers don't tell you that you're a bad person for not celebrating their disease. They do not demand that you willfully blind yourself so you don't see what they are.

That's where pity becomes contempt. At one moment they want to beg and plead and play victim, in the same instant demand that you better validate and encourage their rampant illness. Weak people who want to domineer over you. No word is better at describing what this makes you feel than contempt.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Incorrigible Bigotry, Misogenes, Backinpogform and 27 others
Bloo said:
Why do so many of them use the word “folks”? I know it’s a gender neutral term but so is “people” They specifically love the word “folks”
Click to expand...
And y'all, for a group of people that cry so much about cultural appropriation they're appropriating Southern culture :O
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Misogenes, The Morning Visitor, and I must scream and 6 others
Meat Target said:
Are pooners rarer, harder to clock, or is it just me? MTFs are IMO more garish and attention-seeking.
Click to expand...
Testosterone is powerful, more noticeable than oestrogen in males. If they grow a full beard and aren’t 5’4” or shorter they can pull it off more than the vast majority of males. Buck Angel passes pretty well, up until you hear her speak or notice all the mannerisms. She has been on testosterone for a long time too. She’s also 5’9” which helps.

IMG_1371.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Misogenes, The Morning Visitor, The Poopsmith and 6 others
Meat Target said:
Are pooners rarer, harder to clock, or is it just me? IMO, MTFs more garish and attention-seeking, and it's easier for women to look masculine than for men to look feminine.
Click to expand...
Often they come across as weirdly sassy gay men. They look male but there is something about the way they communicate that is so stereotypically not male. If you don't know better you assume "that's just a really weird guy" but once you find out you go "oh, that makes sense."
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Misogenes, 𖦹Junkpop𖦹, Frankly my dear and 9 others
Bloo said:
Why do so many of them use the word “folks”? I know it’s a gender neutral term but so is “people” They specifically love the word “folks”
Click to expand...
I think its a liberal democrat thing. Obama used "folks" in 2008 and throughout his Presidency to seem more down to earth / to be speaking in a black way without being TOO black, and then it seeped into widespread usage among Democrats because it they think sounds inclusive and unpretentious.

"Queer folks / folx" is the trickle-down effect of that usage.
 
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Misogenes, Anasa Tristis, Sandshrew and 3 others
Idiot Sandwich the 3rd said:
There's nothing trannies hate more than Butch women. They demonstrate that so called "womanhood" is not about performing femininity. They get mad that women dont even try to be women and yet they're more woman than them, men who spend all this time and money on growing their hair and buying skirts.
I wonder if thats why they try to groom gender non conforming women into being pooners
Click to expand...
and yet they still hate pooners with a seething passion. Like even when a lil' dood is trying to be as manly as she possibly can, she still obviously looks female in a way he can't even get close to.
alice & poon.webp

It enrages him. Yet he still has to respect the self-chosen pronouns of this girly girly little fucking pooner, but it doesn't mean anything because he knows she's a woman. Everyone knows. It just reminds him of his own fragility. He wonders if this is how other people are looking at him. He feels fragile.

AGP means being attracted to womanhood as an 'object' detached from the people who create it. So he sees this pooner bitch looking feminine, he views her as owning an object he wants. As if he could just take it from her. "It" is her living body.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Misogenes, Backinpogform, FinnSven and 7 others
Meat Target said:
Are pooners rarer, harder to clock, or is it just me? IMO, MTFs more garish and attention-seeking, and it's easier for women to look masculine than for men to look feminine.
Click to expand...
They have to try harder to be visible (as trans) since dressing down in jeans and a tee are pretty normal wear for women these days as opposed to MTFs where it's easier to see their jewelry, hair style, and clothing choices as more out of place. They really have to uglify and masculinize through T use before it's noticeable unless they're the type to literally wear pronoun pins or something. You might have "met" them but just read them as more or less regular women.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Misogenes, Aunt Carol, CuntessMaximus and 1 other person
Women who identify as nonbinary they/them have always pissed me off in a way I can't quite put my finger on. Full blown pooners are very annoying, but more sad and pitiable because they are so self-destructive and mentally ill. They seem to have a lot of self-hatred. With they/them women, I think it's because they are like the ultimate #NotLikeTheOtherGirls. They NLOGed so hard they don't even consider themselves girls at all. Imagine if a biracial person vehemently rejected and didn't claim one of the races they are. It's understandable that would offend members of that race, right? I think it's understandable for women, then, to be offended when other women "don't claim" them in that way. Like, what's so wrong about being a women that you don't want to identify as one? You have to wonder if they look down on women as a whole. It especially annoys me that we have to tolerate this in professional/corporate settings and pretend it's epic rather than offensive, but that goes for all tranny shit.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Misogenes, Backinpogform, 𖦹Junkpop𖦹 and 12 others
Arbiter said:
Women who identify as nonbinary they/them have always pissed me off in a way I can't quite put my finger on. Full blown pooners are very annoying, but more sad and pitiable because they are so self-destructive and mentally ill. They seem to have a lot of self-hatred. With they/them women, I think it's because they are like the ultimate #NotLikeTheOtherGirls. They NLOGed so hard they don't even consider themselves girls at all. Imagine if a biracial person vehemently rejected and didn't claim one of the races they are. It's understandable that would offend members of that race, right? I think it's understandable for women, then, to be offended when other women "don't claim" them in that way. Like, what's so wrong about being a women that you don't want to identify as one? You have to wonder if they look down on women as a whole. It especially annoys me that we have to tolerate this in professional/corporate settings and pretend it's epic rather than offensive, but that goes for all tranny shit.
Click to expand...
For a lot of them that I have met, I doubt that much thought even went into it. They tend to be timid or dull-witted girls who are following a trend because the cool girls are doing something and you wouldn't want to miss out or look stupid by not going along. It's not even so much that they are rejecting or attempting to escape womanhood. They want to be good girls, popular girls, sophisticated and cool girls, and they were told to show up with a "they them" nametag to get in the club.

The male they thems I have met have been mostly very depressed alternative dudes. Used record store employee types. Big contrast from the floridly perverted troon crowd.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: The Morning Visitor, Pedophobe, Sandshrew and 5 others
Arbiter said:
Women who identify as nonbinary they/them have always pissed me off in a way I can't quite put my finger on.
Click to expand...
It's so obviously nonsensical. You can argue that they aren't as dangerous as full on troons/poons, but those people do seem like they are at least trying to make sense. NBs will say the most ridiculous shit and still expect everyone to go along with it. They will openly talk about how their gender is just a bunch of shit they made up one second and then accuse you of trying to genocide them the next second because you aren't using their ridiculous vanity pronouns.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Misogenes, Backinpogform, Hassou Tobi and 6 others
It’s not the they/thems that are “Not Like The Other Girls,” it’s the she/theys. They get to maintain being a girl and date men but they can say they’re in a “queer” relationship because of the willingness to accept “they”. There isn’t any other changes at all. It’s just a signal that they also strongly support this ideology and want to be a part of it

It’s literally bisexual but bigenderel
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Misogenes, The Morning Visitor, Sandshrew and 3 others
Larry David's Opera Cape said:
And "kiddo." "Children" and "kids" are also both neutral, but they insist on "kiddos."
Click to expand...
Using “kiddo” in any context other than calling your own child it as an occasion semi-condescending nickname is proof beyond reasonable doubt the speaker is some variety of cluster B.

Nothing makes my skin crawl more than mommy bloggers using the term 3-4 times in one sentence aka Myka Stauffer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Misogenes, Aunt Carol, Larry David's Opera Cape and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back