Some (specific sects of) Orthodox believe the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah were destroyed according to the will of God due to the iniquities of the Jews. Only when the Messiah returns can Israel be legitimately restored in their eyes. Of course, when it does those Palestinians will have to face the music. But a secular foundation of Israel? That's against the divine plan, in their eyes, and thus is illegitimate.
The ironic thing is that the wokies and other western retards who let hamas pull wool over their eyes will uphold these specific Jews with their traditional Jewish Pale clothing and behaviour because they agree on this one point, but would be aghast when those same Jews point to biblical condemnation of a thousand other things that should be otherwise acceptable (e.g. homosexuality, trannies, etc.). Their condemnation of Israel is conceptually parallel to their condemnation of other things, but only this single rejection of Israel has any credibility. If you say their rejection of Israel uses the same arguments for their rejection of trannies, it would cause the wokies' smoothened brains to short circuit.
What the fuck does this even mean? I went on vacation once to Germany and visited Wannsee, where the Nazis developed the Final Solution. And it was specifically to see where the Nazis developed their plan, the original documents, etc. Does that make (((me))) a Nazi? Literally what even is Blobert trying to argue? That all places with historical significance regarding past atrocities need to be bulldozed and anyone attempting to visit put on a proscription list? Sorry, Diabeto, but most people don't want to sit in a basement apartment their entire lives marinating their guts in mountain dew while only interacting with the wider world through twitter. Some people *gasp* want to see historical locations and expand their knowledge.