Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
So so much here but I'm going to get right to the point rather than brutalize Bob too badly.

Abortion has never been "fully legal across the U.S." not even after Roe. And Roe has yet to be overruled (except by Casey, which also has yet to be overruled) and even if it was I'd be skeptical about Bob's ability to live to see abortion being "fully legal" when every country on Earth and every State in the Union restricts it and many pro-choice people oppose the practice in one way or another.


Hate speech isn't illegal though. Like abortion, free speech is a right protected outside of most of the democratic process. You should be honest and just say that you want to repeal the First Amendment so people can be imprisoned for their speech. (Or like Bob, argue that it should only apply to 2% of the population that agrees with the government.)
Bobby not knowing how things work. As to put it nicely, Bob being Bob.
 
One of Bob's verbose brainfarts is going semi-viral on Twitter. (I say "semi" because as of this posting it has about 700+ likes, which while not all that impressive is miles better than Bob usually gets.) Highly recommend checking it out; lots of dunking on Bob to be found. My favorite so far: the revelation that Bob would go to cons, shuffle into signings obviously hoping to be recognized, then slouching out when it became clear no one was asking for an autograph. Amusing story, but the killer is one reply:

View attachment 3245861

Thread may be found here: https://twitter.com/LazlosGhost/status/1521642927209865220
BWAHAHAHHA
Screenshot_20220504-091029_Brave.jpg
 
I uh... I'm also guessing you are the granddaughters that weren't aborted.
I doubt it was Ketanji Brown, if only because I don't think she's yet in a position to do something like this. Speculation is pointing toward clerks for Sotomayor and Breyer who have connections to people involved with the article. Of the Justices themselves, the only one I can see doing it is Sotomayor, largely because I've long been of the opinion that she's by far the stupidest member of the Court.
Yeah all the smart money is on Sotomayor's office. The federalist podcast had a great talk about this, how young lawyers coming up have really embraced this idea of speech as violence.
 
ACKTUALLY friendo, he spends all day at a WORKSTATION and so is able to spend all day on Twitter fighting for Good People. Don't try and minimize Bob's achievements again if you know what's good for you.
I know you're doing a thing, and it is funny, but I have to be exceptional and point out to anyone not aware that he almost exclusively tweets from his phone. Once in a blue moon you would see something from tweetdeck but the last time I remember seeing that was when his dead account was still active and that was just so he could monitor both accounts at the same time. These are his latest tweets from this morning. The contents of the tweets don't matter for this discussion. Just look at the bottom, next to the date, to see the tweet source.
1651670545990.png
1651670432974.png
1651670469942.png
1651670501979.png
And it's Twitter for Android all the way down. Unless the Lord of Lynn is tech savvy enough to be able to install a virtual machine that runs an Android OS, which LMAO I know, he is glued to his phone. This is not new. You can go back to tweets from 2012 and see him tweeting from his phone.
08-04-12 If dinosaurs ARE awesome.PNG


I cannot imagine what would need to happen to me that would make me tweet, not text nor call nor write a blogpost, 200 times in a single day from my cellphone. He is a teenage girl who's upset that everyone else is prettier than him.
 
Last edited:
I doubt it was Ketanji Brown, if only because I don't think she's yet in a position to do something like this. Speculation is pointing toward clerks for Sotomayor and Breyer who have connections to people involved with the article. Of the Justices themselves, the only one I can see doing it is Sotomayor, largely because I've long been of the opinion that she's by far the stupidest member of the Court.



Don't know about disbarred ... but they can be impeached.

Sotomayor might be the best guess so far, looks like they are pretty certain of the Clerk who leaked and soon enough he is gonna get squeezed for answers, and I guess if the backlash is too bad, the guy might talk. Maybe it was a rogue act of one self-important man "fightring for democracy", or maybe someone convinced him to fuck up his life so he could be one.

Either way, even if he talks and even points the finger directly at Sotomayor, or any judge that might have a hand in this, nothing will happen, not when the whole discourse is this divided and when such decision can bring even more fragmentation, and if any riot break or any death comes of it, no one wants their hands in yet another Jan 6 regardless of the side.

I have to wonder how he's held onto it for so long with all the shit he's said and I reckon it's that he's managed to fly under the radar enough that not enough people have noticed his bullshit to make it an issue worth dealing with. Despite his infamy, and the amount of pages of content in this thread (Please don't lock it at 5000. I want to see if we can get to 10k before he dies) no one really cares about Moviebob all that much. His viewership has dwindled and everyone has lost any respect they once held for him. He doesn't say takes that would immediately get him lynched for wrong think, he's just uncomfortably aggressive against the enemy. And he spews out so much bullshit on twitter that it's easy to get overwhelmed and stop caring because it all rolls into each other.

Having said that, the amount of grave dancing that would happen if Bob finally lost his twitter would jump this thread up by a thousand posts minimum.

Hard to see Robert losing his twitter honestly, too much of a nobody that even if he has spicy takes, nobody will move much an inch because of him, he is more of a annoyance than anything else.

I can't remember who said it, but the most perfect description I've seen for Robert was that he was just like Frarva from the movie Super Troopers: loud and obnoxious, Farva is desperate for the attention and approval of his peers, so much that he tries to emulate what they do (like pranks and such), but since he is a clueless sperg without tact, he always takes his action too far, causing discomfort and eventually mockery from the very people he is trying to impress.

By now Robert should know that this tough guy talk about dehumanizing the other side doesn't play well on twitter even if it is for edgelording, he has 10 years of being called a eugenecist. And yet, may any issue that may get the Democrats and twitter libs raging, here comes Robert with his importent rage going overboard once again, while everybody face palms and just go "this idiot again..."

So it feels that the issues ain't really the "issue", but whatever grievance "du jour" is just an excuse to Robert be start edgelording again, because the world is "oh so horrible".

Well friends, Bob has finally hit over 200 tweets in one day.
View attachment 3246244
Assuming one tweet a minute, he spent almost four hours on Twitter.
Four hours is being very generous with Robert.

Social media ain't just posting and getting back to whatever you were doing. No, you post, and then you keep refreshing to see people's reaction, those take a lot of time. Also you need to keep tabs with the other people you follow, and Robert actively seeks reactions and news so he can get his dunks on, even from people who has him blocked, that takes more time as well.


On this back and forth, between posting, looks for feedback and searching people and news to post about, this constant act of engagement with social media, that shit takes hours, even if you just post a few things a day.

Now imagine 200 tweets a day! Robert hasn't left his phone because the whole twitter was busting with people having their takes about the WoeWade shit, and Robert is nothing but excited to join the frenesi, he is addicted to this shit.

This whole act "I just tweets between breaks while I do pen the next script for a billion viewes channel :smug:" is nothing but a silly cope Robert expect people to buy it, yeah, sure friendo.
 
Last edited:
can't remember who said it, but the most perfect description I've seen for Robert was that he was just like Frarva from the movie Super Troopers: loud and obnoxious, Farva is desperate for the attention and approval of his peers, so much that he tries to emulate what they do (like pranks and such), but since he is a clueless sperg without tact, he always takes his action too far, causing discomfort and eventually mockery from the very people he is trying to impress.
It was your old buddy Mola!

 
Chrisie's Angel rages over something that is of no concern to him
man.png




frustration.png
On the top of my head I can think of ten things one can do to alleviate frustration (one of them is to pray), yet a better strategy is to avoid getting frustrated in the first place.

eug.png

The leak has made more people aware of how legally insubstantial the rationale behind RvW is.
RW.png

freemarket.png

There is a deep irony in referring to abortion as "non life-threatening treatment".
amazonabort.png

scum.png

holocaust.png
Whatever I want is "morally correct". These people are all moral expressivists.

nympho.png
Please send your worst; the Red States are shaking at the thoughts of an army of Emmas With Two Moms.

"The Soviet leaders have openly and publicly declared," said Reagan, "that the only morality they recognize is that which would further their cause.... everything is moral for the annihilation of old exploiting social order..." Say. doesn't Bobby like vodka?
reagan.png


Bobby's had to apologize for his transphobia, after calling Marjorie Taylor-Greene "Barney Rubble in a wig". The offending tweet was swiftly deleted.
phobe.png

John Vinals was among those who complained. This brings his relationship with Bobby closer to the breaking point.
vinals.png


Moon.png
With the name "Lilith", you can guess the sex of the beast.

moon2.png




Even being served his favorite pabulum cannot assuage Bobby's rage.
tantrum.png


Next product:
consoom.png

Someone attacked Dave Chappelle, who improvised a joke immediately afterwards.
chappelle.png
As if blacks are so sympathetic towards trannies.

tantrum.png

doll.png
 
I hope you appreciate the struggles I had to overcome for this...
View attachment 3246718

OK I've archived that glorious tweet.

EDIT: Quote Retweets now preserved.

Seriously these have made my day...
View attachment 3246707
View attachment 3246708
View attachment 3246710
View attachment 3246712
View attachment 3246713
View attachment 3246716
View attachment 3246720
Bob not realizing his entire spiel reads like something out of Mein Kampf and denying it when called out because "I'm literally the OPPOSITE of a Nazi! I just want to minecraft the Stupid that Stole My Soopeeryah Fyootchah Jetpack from me. We have to get rid of bigots to keep the minorities safe! You guys wanna get rid of bigots, right? Doesn't everybody want to get rid of bigots? You can't genocide bigots any more than you can bully bullies. If you didn't want to get rid of the bigots, then you MUST be a bigot, friendo!" will never not be funny.

It will also never not be funny that even The Hotdog Abortion found this line of reasoning a bridge too far, thus depriving Bob of the faintest hope that she'd ever have abortions with him.
Sotomayor might be the best guess so far, looks like they are pretty certain of the Clerk who leaked and soon enough he is gonna get squeezed for answers, and I guess if the backlash is too bad, the guy might talk. Maybe it was a rogue act of one self-important man "fightring for democracy", or maybe someone convinced him to fuck up his life so he could be one.

Either way, even if he talks and even points the finger directly at Sotomayor, or any judge that might have a hand in this, nothing will happen, not when the whole discourse is this divided and when such decision can bring even more fragmentation, and if any riot break or any death comes of it, no one wants their hands in yet another Jan 6 regardless of the side.



Hard to see Robert losing his twitter honestly, too much of a nobody that even if he has spicy takes, nobody will move much an inch because of him, he is more of a annoyance than anything else.

I can't remember who said it, but the most perfect description I've seen for Robert was that he was just like Frarva from the movie Super Troopers: loud and obnoxious, Farva is desperate for the attention and approval of his peers, so much that he tries to emulate what they do (like pranks and such), but since he is a clueless sperg without tact, he always takes his action too far, causing discomfort and eventually mockery from the very people he is trying to impress.

By now Robert should know that this tough guy talk about dehumanizing the other side doesn't play well on twitter even if it is for edgelording, he has 10 years of being called a eugenecist. And yet, may any issue that may get the Democrats and twitter libs raging, here comes Robert with his importent rage going overboard once again, while everybody face palms and just go "this idiot again..."

So it feels that the issues ain't really the "issue", but whatever grievance "du jour" is just an excuse to Robert be start edgelording again, because the world is "oh so horrible".


Four hours is being very generous with Robert.

Social media ain't just posting and getting back to whatever you were doing. No, you post, and then you keep refreshing to see people's reaction, those take a lot of time. Also you need to keep tabs with the other people you follow, and Robert actively seeks reactions and news so he can get his dunks on, even from people who has him blocked, that takes more time as well.


On this back and forth, between posting, looks for feedback and searching people and news to post about, this constant act of engagement with social media, that shit takes hours, even if you just post a few things a day.

Now imagine 200 tweets a day! Robert hasn't left his phone because the whole twitter was busting with people having their takes about the WoeWade shit, and Robert is nothing but excited to join the frenesi, he is addicted to this shit.

This whole act "I just tweets between breaks while I do pen the next script for a billion viewes channel :smug:" is nothing but a silly cope Robert expect people to buy it, yeah, sure friendo.
I mean I GUESS it could have been out of Sotomayor's office, but the timeline is extremely sus. Far as I know nothing like this has ever leaked like that. It only happened after Ketanji-Brown was confirmed. Also, didn't Sotomayor call herself a "Wise Latina ™️ "? If this came from her office, or even specifically her personally, then hell no she ain't no "Wise Latina", she's a fool, and she's got partisan crayon-eating galaxy-smoothbrained hacks working for her.

Only Bob could whine about us not seeing the inherent nuances of genocide.
But but friendo, genocide is the elimination of a group of people. You can't genocide Not-A-Persons!' Bigots don't believe some people are People, and thus they don't get personhood and thus are not people any more than fetuses are! - Bob, most likely (though I don't know what the fetuses did to Bob to deserve non personhood tbh)

Someone needs to make a meme of a fetus in utero with the caption "The Fetus that Stole Film Robert's Jetpack and thus his soopeeryah fyootchah" and photoshop a jetpack on said fetus.
 
Bob is speedrunning "pissing every twatter person off" just by not shutting the fuck up. Trannies, empty egg cartons, male feminists... Everybody be hating the bobster.

Also love the occasional stress sighs he puts in his tweets *sigh*
*Sighhhhh* You don't understand, what I REALLY mean is... - The never-ending words of a fat retarded man.
 
I saw from people mocking him on Twitter that Bob went full eugenics again.
Apparently it's a bit of a (admittedly kinda lame) meme.
View attachment 3245903
As lazy and repetitive as this meme may be, it's legitimately evergreen.

The first draft of Bobby's manifesto is leaked. The reviews are dead poor.
View attachment 3245917
Probably one of the few times Moviebob might have actually realized it's [ed.] committed a likely TOS violation.

Note the tweet in the red square. Bobby deleted it once its true implication was pointed out to him.
View attachment 3245925
What part of "...my fondest wish is that 'Eugenics' hadn't been tainted as a science..." requires any additional context? Those twelve words stand up as a self-explanatory statement.



Yes, the good guys can win... but that requires bad people and evil entities like Moviebob to be completely and thoroughly defeated.



By Bobby's definition the sole purpose of bullying is to make people suffer. Democrats are bullies.
View attachment 3244997
Once again, by Moviebob's own definition, Moviebob is itself a bully.



View attachment 3244988
I think "rare" should be a keyword in the abortion debate. Even as a Christian [...] the total ban on abortion is neither humane nor beneficial, but the procedure are not to be thought as an alternative to contraception or, worse, as a form of "empowerment" like Lindsay Ellis apparently thinks.
Interesting coincidence. Yesterday on Timcast IRL, Pool brought up a discussion with Daily Wire's Matt Walsh about
Tim Pool: "This is the argument that's often made from the Left because I don't think they're having conversations with conservatives [...] talking to Matt Walsh was particularly enlightening. [...] He effectively said, '[...] you can terminate a pregnancy, but that doesn't mean you have to kill the baby, meaning at certain points, you can save the baby's life; why wouldn't you do it?' [...] There's an interesting question, I think, for most pro-abortion people we should ask: 'If a woman is pregnant in the second or third trimester and the baby can safely be removed ending the pregnancy, but the baby can also be saved, should that be mandated?'"
Major difference between Tim and Moviebob: Tim's words are capable of invoking thought; Moviebob's words are built on a substrate of superstitious beliefs.

Also a Tim Pool stan has several orders of magnitude more brain cells than a Bob Chipman stan.
Hear, hear!



View attachment 3245104
That a procedure is part of health care doesn't mean it should not be legally regulated. Indeed one can argue that abortion should be put under stringent legal oversight because it is part of health care. BTW Bobby is anything but a "positivist": rather he is a moral emotivist.
Calling abortion both "not evil" and a "moral good" like Moviebob has... that is an open admission for supporting eugenics.



Catholic latina girl thinks abortion is a sacred right, perhaps even a sacred rite.
View attachment 3245051
Reminder: Abortion/infanticide is not a right.



View attachment 3245095
A truly capable woman, should she think children would hamper her life plan, will know how to avoid pregnancy in the first place
Two comments I want to make:

Jill Filipovic: "Millions of women would never have been able to achieve things [...] without legal abortion. Many wouldn't [...] have met the love of their life..."
Blatant lie. There are millions more women in the U.S. who refrain from engaging in sexual activity--let alone get pregnant--before they fiind the man they want to spend the rest of their lives with. Additionally, if any woman were to look at "Mr. Right", stir up some conversation, then admit to him she's an abortion advocate, she might as well call herself "Miss Itainthappeningsister".

Jill Filipovic: "Millions of women would never have been able to achieve things [...] without legal abortion. Many wouldn't [...] have had their beloved children."
What...

the...

FUCK?!



Elizabeth Warren is very angry. So angry that she needs someone to hold her arm.
Anger is how you WIN.
View attachment 3245151
I remember why Moviebob is so ga-ga over Fauxcahontas Warren: They're both virulent racists; Warren for misappropriating Native American to further her career; Moviebob for being berating white people (see image below under "Are you sure?").



If we don't like the law, we FITE! ANARCHY!!!!
View attachment 3245068
A "no stupids" policy. Well done, Bob; by your own standards, enacting a "no stupids" policy means that you've disqualified yourself from ever being appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.



Bobby has so many hats to juggle: hey presto he is now an ECONOMIST!
View attachment 3245119
How can Moviebob be an economist when it can't make enough money without Patreon?



View attachment 3245135
Churches have opened hospitals, schools, daycare centers, shelters, and charities. But I guess these count as "nothing" because Christians aren't human.
While we're at it, Moviebob's beneficial contributions toward society can be summarized in a single keystroke: 0.



View attachment 3245129

Somehow RvW should also be the concern of Bob Chapek:
View attachment 3245131

Angels. They are what Bobby prayed for.
View attachment 3245091
Ah, yes. Words of advice from Joe "Do As I Say, Not As I Do" Biden, the current Fuckwit in Chief.



Of course. Moviebob just wants the MAGA witches to burn.



A deranged and violent man tells women what to do.
View attachment 3244994
Yes... but you're more likely to face life-threatening assaulted and attacked by BL(DR)M or Antifa than you ever are from someone within the MAGA movement.



Bob Chipman. Rod Serling. "Obsolete Man". You can figure out the rest.



Ahem:
MVB-AcceptableRacism.JPG




View attachment 3246558
On the top of my head I can think of ten things one can do to alleviate frustration (one of them is to pray), yet a better strategy is to avoid getting frustrated in the first place.
One of which is taking a nice, hour-long walk around the neighborhood.



Props to CthulusRoomMate for calling Moviebob out.



The leak has made more people aware of how legally insubstantial the rationale behind RvW is.
View attachment 3246545
Coincidentally. Moviebob's worldview is essentially a version of Calvinball in which the rules are perpetually changed, just so long as said rule changes favor Moviebob.



You have many of those same rights in every single U.S. state, Bob. You're a Thinker™; you should have already known that.



There is a deep irony in referring to abortion as "non life-threatening treatment".
View attachment 3246881
Abortion is not "non-life-threatening". In actuality, abortion threatens no fewer than two lives.



Once again, abortion/infanticide is not a right.



View attachment 3246519
Whatever I want is "morally correct". These people are all moral expressivists.
Retweeted by Eugenicsbob.



"The Soviet leaders have openly and publicly declared," said Reagan, "that the only morality they recognize is that which would further their cause.... everything is moral for the annihilation of old exploiting social order..." Say. doesn't Bobby like vodka?
View attachment 3246514
Da, komrade.



Even being served his favorite pabulum cannot assuage Bobby's rage.
View attachment 3246487
I'd like to know which Libertarian film critic got Moviebob so pissed. I might want to follow him/her on Twitter and proclaim getting blocked by Moviebob is a badge of honor to be worn with pride.



Someone attacked Dave Chappelle, who improvised a joke immediately afterwards.
View attachment 3246481
As if blacks are so sympathetic towards trannies.
As if Moviebob is genuinely sympathetic to anyone.
 
Last edited:
Bob and all the speds on Twitter acting like every pro-life argument boils down to Christfagging should take 10 minutes to read Female Infanticide Worldwide: The Case for Action by the UN Human Rights Council by the Asian Center for Human Rights. Archive link.

TLDR: In places like China and India that still have rigid gender norms or dowry practices, couples abort hundreds of thousands if not millions of female fetuses per year simply for having XX sex chromosomes. It happens on such a massive scale that it has noticeably skewed the gender ratios of the two most populous nations on Earth. They're able to do this because abortions are cheap, accessible, and if not strictly legal at least generally overlooked by the authorities.

"The invention of technology i.e. ultrasonography for pre-natal sex determination in the 1980s replaced intentional killing of infant girls with sex selective abortion of female foetuses. Since the 1990s various studies recognised female infanticide as a serious problem with reduction of women in comparison to men... The United Nations in 2007 estimated that between 113 million and 200 million girls/women are demographically 'missing' across the globe and the number has increased with more than 117 million girls/women 'missing' in Asia alone due to sex selective abortions... The Population Reference Bureau estimates that every year 1.5 million girls go missing at birth”.

By what conceivable metric has easy access to abortion improved society in southeast Asia, Bob? Because I can think of at least one metric by which it's holding those socities back: they have no reason to rethink their medieval customs of giving away 150 goats as a dowry for their daughters, because they can just suck the daughters out and try again for sons.

I say all this as someone who's always been pro-choice. There are intellectually honest, logical arguments against abortion that have nothing to do with faith and are worth hearing out, and if like Bob you refuse to acknowledge a single one, it's because you have the moral, emotional, and intellectual depth of a toddler. Like Bob.
 
TLDR: In places like China and India that still have rigid gender norms or dowry practices, couples abort hundreds of thousands if not millions of female fetuses per year simply for having XX sex chromosomes. It happens on such a massive scale that it has noticeably skewed the gender ratios of the two most populous nations on Earth. They're able to do this because abortions are cheap, accessible, and if not strictly legal at least generally overlooked by the authorities.
Here is a historical fact that Bob is completely ignorant of: the Chinese used to leave newborn girls to die at the edge of the village. My great-great grandparents were Lutheran missionaries (AKA the "stupids" in Bobspeak) in Qing China and my great-great grandmother rescued those girls and set up a school to educate them. Like you said, these gender norms have changed little since then and abortion in this countries led to what would otherwise be called a genocide. Some feminist, that Bob.
 
Bob and all the speds on Twitter acting like every pro-life argument boils down to Christfagging should take 10 minutes to read Female Infanticide Worldwide: The Case for Action by the UN Human Rights Council by the Asian Center for Human Rights. Archive link.

TLDR: In places like China and India that still have rigid gender norms or dowry practices, couples abort hundreds of thousands if not millions of female fetuses per year simply for having XX sex chromosomes. It happens on such a massive scale that it has noticeably skewed the gender ratios of the two most populous nations on Earth. They're able to do this because abortions are cheap, accessible, and if not strictly legal at least generally overlooked by the authorities.

"The invention of technology i.e. ultrasonography for pre-natal sex determination in the 1980s replaced intentional killing of infant girls with sex selective abortion of female foetuses. Since the 1990s various studies recognised female infanticide as a serious problem with reduction of women in comparison to men... The United Nations in 2007 estimated that between 113 million and 200 million girls/women are demographically 'missing' across the globe and the number has increased with more than 117 million girls/women 'missing' in Asia alone due to sex selective abortions... The Population Reference Bureau estimates that every year 1.5 million girls go missing at birth”.

By what conceivable metric has easy access to abortion improved society in southeast Asia, Bob? Because I can think of at least one metric by which it's holding those socities back: they have no reason to rethink their medieval customs of giving away 150 goats as a dowry for their daughters, because they can just suck the daughters out and try again for sons.

I say all this as someone who's always been pro-choice. There are intellectually honest, logical arguments against abortion that have nothing to do with faith and are worth hearing out, and if like Bob you refuse to acknowledge a single one, it's because you have the moral, emotional, and intellectual depth of a toddler. Like Bob.
The ultra-progressive, ultra-pro-abortion New Democratic Party of British Columbia, thought they had a way to get around this, given the huge numbers of Asian and South Asian immigrants that populate the province (particularly Vancouver and surrounding areas). They forbade the sonogram technicians from revealing the sex of the baby in the 1990s, hoping against hope that in ignorance, and hoping for that boy they wanted, South Asians and Azns stuck in that mindset would refrain from aborting, because they just wouldn't know. They couldn't bring themselves to put any restrictions on abortions whatsoever, but even they saw sex-selective abortions as a bridge too far, even if they had to under their own ideology to do work-arounds that had nothing to do with abortion. I hate to say it, but Bob is worse than the BC NDP, and the NDP is NFG (No Fucking Good - a slogan that popped up just before the NDP was voted out of office in the late 1990s for blatant incompetence economically and socially).

Bob has no the fuck idea just how much damage not just insanely widespread, but outright forced abortion has done to Soopeeryah Chyna. Especially given how rabidly the One Child Policy was enforced. It's definitely no Believer ™️ society of any sort. And yet in some time in the Fyootchah, its demographic collapse will cripple it to the point where nobody will be available to take care of the current and upcoming batch of elderly. Yet bob continues to insist that Feti are Not People, and thus Don't Matter, just like REEpublicans, and that means they can be disposed of willy-nilly without negative consequences.

I have no clue why Bobby ties in the "fairy tales of Sky Daddy" into the concept that Fetuses "can't" be People. It does not require a religious belief of any sort to recognize, as "science" would, that a human life starts at conception. Concepts such as "quickening" (baby kicking in the womb) indicating the start of "personhood"/life and the idea that a baby is only a person once it has left the womb, are NOT forward concepts; they are in fact, fairy tales and myths, every bit as much as what he thinks the "Sky Daddy" ones are. Now, if Fetus Yeetus must be performed on the womb (I know of someone, deceased after a good long life, that had a termination due to ectopic pregnancy; nothing wrong with that as both were doomed if nothing was done), that's one thing. But Bob's taken the same behavioral track as Justin Trudeau which is making sure that any and all abortions that could happen, MUST happen.

Here is a historical fact that Bob is completely ignorant of: the Chinese used to leave newborn girls to die at the edge of the village. My great-great grandparents were Lutheran missionaries in Qing China (AKA the "stupids" in Bobspeak), and my great-great grandmother rescued those girls and set up a school to educate them. Like you said, these gender norms have changed little since then and abortion in this countries led to what would otherwise be called a genocide. Some feminist, that Bob.
To Bob, this would be a fate worse than death for those girls, as they were turned into Believers ™️. Because now, having lived and Believed, they are holding back Bob's :lunacy: wheat, jetpack, and mario-shka brain in Robot Body. This is why he's so rabidly for abortion that he can't countenance even one spare baby falling into the hands of "child traffickers/baby sellers" (read: Christian Adoption Agencies) and thus maybe falling into the influence of Believers ™️ (even though rebellion against one's taught beliefs IS A THING). He just can't take that chance, even if it's up in the air or uncertain. Better dead than red Saved ™️, eh Bob?

But see, that's the other thing about Bob's entire philosophy. Like every eugenicist before him (while he denies being one because Opposite of Nazi, Friendo!), is his net is too wide. Just as those bad people from WWII started minecrafting Trump's Chosen, and moved on to speds and just about anything and everything that might not even have been really "defective", Bob would have any potential "Stupid ™️ " minecrafted. Even if they're not in fact a Stupid ™️ but in fact (by way of fluke or rebellion) ackshually a potential or certain Vote Blue No Matter Who. This is what makes his views so repugnant even to the damn commies on twitter.

Bob, Friendo. If the fucking TANKIE COMMUNISTS think you're going too hard on eliminating the opposition, you've fucked up.
 
Last edited:
I know you said content does not matter but two of these...
I know you're doing a thing, and it is funny, but I have to be exceptional and point out to anyone not aware that he almost exclusively tweets from his phone. Once in a blue moon you would see something from tweetdeck but the last time I remember seeing that was when his dead account was still active and that was just so he could monitor both accounts at the same time. These are his latest tweets from this morning. The contents of the tweets don't matter for this discussion. Just look at the bottom, next to the date, to see the tweet source.
View attachment 3246654
Blob, abortion on demand is not what keeps those countries a few years higher. Socialized medicine does not either. What keeps them higher is the fact that people in those countries are not giant fat fucks like you.

The top countries in life expectancy tend to be the lowest in obesity.
Glass fucking houses, Blob.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back